I do agree on the fee, but the context of the fees is that we had enough money to get it right this time.
As far as the wait and sees. I'm willing to do it with the players. Even though they are wait an sees mostly because they're under performing or just shit right now.
However, the manager? Nah, I've seen enough now - I'd fire him at the end of the season. He's not capable of making logical decisions.
No it's not, this formation is perfect for the players we've got, that's the entire reason we changed to play this way.It all very square peg round holes approach at the moment..
No it's not, this formation is perfect for the players we've got, that's the entire reason we changed to play this way.
Can in replace of Lovren.. Can arguably should be in midfield, preferably as a DM..
Sterling up top.. should be on the wing.. never a striker..
Henderson at times RWB.. should be in the centre
Glen Johnson at the Backline of 3.. I mean WTF was that about ?
Markovic and IBE playing in Wing Back.. positions..
We also seem to have a difficulty in accomodating both Lallana and Countinho in the same line up...
Its working though.. and the football has been much better and great to watch.. So I cannot really complain.
It does suit some of our players, and has definitely brought the zip back into our game, but I maintain the formation is very much a square peg round holes approach.. It is working though and working very well..
The very essence of our transfer policy is that the players have a footballing brain and can fit in multiple positions and with the recent improvement in the team it seems to be working. So why claim they're square pegs when clearly they are adaptable?Can in replace of Lovren.. Can arguably should be in midfield, preferably as a DM..
Sterling up top.. should be on the wing.. never a striker..
Henderson at times RWB.. should be in the centre
Glen Johnson at the Backline of 3.. I mean WTF was that about ?
Markovic and IBE playing in Wing Back.. positions..
We also seem to have a difficulty in accomodating both Lallana and Countinho in the same line up...
Its working though.. and the football has been much better and great to watch.. So I cannot really complain.
It does suit some of our players, and has definitely brought the zip back into our game, but I maintain the formation is very much a square peg round holes approach.. It is working though and working very well..
The very essence of our transfer policy is that the players have a footballing brain and can fit in multiple positions and with the recent improvement in the team it seems to be working. So why claim they're square pegs when clearly they are adaptable?
It's a concern that we've only lost like twice in a zillion games.
Yes, a real concern.
#soworried
You don't need a DM in 3-4-3
of course you do... it one of the key positions in that formation, in order for it to work effectivley... thats why Lucas was brought in..
Lucas helped control the midfield by disrupting the opponents attack and also connecting the defense with offense by being the start of most attacks. Bit of a unsung hero in our recent run form.
His contribution has been key to our success...
You've seemed to have replied and ignored my point. With flexible players that can adapt to multiple positions we won't always be playing 3-4-3.I just dont see 3-4-3 as long term solution.. We are missing a key player to make that formation successful as a long term solution..
We can leave ourselves very open to counter attack.. in order for 3-4-3 to effectivley work we need a mascherano type DM.. a destroyer if you like...
At the moment with Lucas being our only recognisable DM and injured.. we are somewhat vulnrable as we have no natural DM covering the back 3..
Allen.. as DM.. its another square Peg in a round hole.. Can probably is the most likely solution, but yet untested (consistantly) for us in this role
Signs of exposure in that position where showing in the first half against Crystal Palace.. Against a more gifted team I can see our weaknesses in this area being exploited heavily... its a concern..
"If it ain't broke, definitely fix it."Yeah but 3-4-3 is not for the future especially if we keep winning.
You couldn't make this shit up at times.
How good is Sterling at picking his nose? Cos Ming is a master at it!I used to care but now I don't care if Brendan plays Sterling in goal or Ming at left wing and still win games on the trot.
Winning is what matters.
It won't be too long before the opposition figures out how to exploit our shortcomings in the 3-4-3, namely isolating and pressuring our CBs as we've seen them doing the last few matches. Our wingbacks don't provide enough cover for this to work long term, and we've too many talented wide players and fullbacks to keep them in wingback roles anyways. It might last until the end of the season at best.
I think the first ones to expose us will be in the Europa league ties.
of course you do... it one of the key positions in that formation, in order for it to work effectivley... thats why Lucas was brought in..
Lucas helped control the midfield by disrupting the opponents attack and also connecting the defense with offense by being the start of most attacks. Bit of a unsung hero in our recent run form.
His contribution has been key to our success...
It won't be too long before the opposition figures out how to exploit our shortcomings in the 3-4-3, namely isolating and pressuring our CBs as we've seen them doing the last few matches. Our wingbacks don't provide enough cover for this to work long term, and we've too many talented wide players and fullbacks to keep them in wingback roles anyways. It might last until the end of the season at best.
I think the first ones to expose us will be in the Europa league ties.
I'm with Ruik on this - a DM in our current setup is pointless.
Those two central midfielders need to be mobile and intelligent enough to help out defence & attack as required.
In the system, Lucas has to get forward, which for me is where he struggles - but he's is better at the defending side of the role - so he helps & is important in that respect.
But.... he's not playing as a DM, and the system only works if the CM roles are ore expansive.
We are playing with wing backs that play higher up than the do in the conventional 3-5-2 system.. which is shown by playing IBE or Markovic on the wing..
A defensive midfielder I believe is a must if you want to protect your back 3, especially away from home..
Lucas rarely ventures into the opponents half..
Take against Aston Vila as an example..
We are playing with wing backs that play higher up than the do in the conventional 3-5-2 system.. which is shown by playing IBE or Markovic on the wing..
A defensive midfielder I believe is a must if you want to protect your back 3, especially away from home..
Take against Aston Vila as an example.. Lucas rarely ventures into the opponents half, but provides that link up play that connects the defence to the attack...
You are right in regards to pressing, but my concern is the isolation of our central defenders. While this shouldn't happen in theory, our midfield tends to either push too far forward, or not at all, and doesn't have quite the awareness to exploit this. As good as Henderson has been in the final third at times, he's had a huge number of missed opportunities in linking up the attack with the back line. Allen made up for this some, but the execution is really lacking, forcing Sturridge to drop extremely deep to start the attack.The thing is - it's actually really hard to play a high pressing game against a 343 because it's a really flexible system and it requires the opposition to commit 2 upfront and as soon as they do you can overload them in other areas.
If the opposition stick 1 up front to close down CB's then the ball just gets passed ing the line to the other side - so Can & Sakho become the outlets for taking the ball out of defence.
Last season Gerrard was the outlet - much easier to close down.
If they push attacking midfielders up in behind the forward to the 2 CM's can drop deep & it exposes the oppositions flanks.
If the opposition midfielders try to press on one side it unbalances the other side.
I watched Glen Hoddle do a tactical review before the Chelsea cup games & he was talking up how hard this system was to press against.
I'm certain Rodgers has tweaked the system to combat teams that press - which seems the norm now.
Look at the FA Cup game against Oalace at the weekend - the commentators were shocked that Palace weren't pressing us hard in the first half - they sat back & hit on the counter - and went in 1-0 up.
2nd half - they started pressing high up the pitch - & we scored 2.
To be fair to Rodgers - I think he's more tactically astute than people give him credit for.