Innit though.
Beggars belief.
Course it does, that's why we had to rely upon a player most people had down as finished the season previous.
Innit though.
Beggars belief.
That has NOTHING to do with experience Mark.Course it does, that's why we had to rely upon a player most people had down as finished the season previous.
Agger and Skrtel have no experience?
That has NOTHING to do with experience Mark.
But by all means carry on.
I'm not talking about what's in the history books, I'm talking about what's clearly visible on the pitch. Put the fucking chalk board away you boring cunt.
It's spreadsheets I rely on you stupid cock.
And you're not talking about experience, you're talking about a mixture of ability and leadership. You fuckwit.
Experience is one of the worst things to buy a player for l.
Youre being really silly.What are you talking about? Of course it does. So what's "the" point about experience then? That they both have it because they're pushing 30? If it's not making a significant difference to what they bring to the side, what's the point in using it as an attribute? They both had to be bailed out by a guy on his last legs, so what was the point of their experience then?
It's like saing every pensioner is wise in the ways of the World.
My point is simply that that argument is retarded.
Its similar to the one that says 'If Spurs didnt have Bale they would be shit!'
YES but they HAVE Bale.
90k per week for a 32 year old has been "squad" player doesn't make business sense especially that we are not in Europe.
I could see the point Hansern was making about going for someone with the experience of winning titles, playing in high pressured games, etc. I'm not in agreement about the chosen player, but the point about the attributes is valid to some extent.
But then if you look at other sides who have taken that approach ..... Sunderland buying a load of United players for example
Is it really such a good basis for a signing?
Right so what good example is Toure going to set? Who is going to benefit?
What can he teach our youngsters? How to get through drug tests?
Where have you got 90k from?
But that IS the point.It's not the same at all, now who's being silly. I'm not saying if we didn't have Agger we'd need experience, I'm saying we do have Agger (and Skrtel) and we still lack the necessary qualities at the back, whether it be experience, leadership or organisational skills, whatever. It's a moot point, the drift I got was that we didn't need experience in those terms because we already have two 29 year old defenders - but they lack the necessary qualities, whatever their age, so clearly we do need "something", I'm not saying that's Toure but I could see the point Hansern was making about going for someone with the experience of winning titles, playing in high pressured games, etc. I'm not in agreement about the chosen player, but the point about the attributes is valid to some extent.
Hansern, scouts don't watch the players that their club has already signed. They watch players who play for other clubs. That's how they identify targets, if they watched their own club and scouted their own players then they'd just keep recommending to the manager to sign players that he has already signed and the whole system would break down.
But that IS the point.
He said APART from Agger.
I was pointing out we HAVE agger and someone else pointed out we have Skrtel.
I didnt suggest we have enough, I didnt suggest we dont need to buy, I didnt suggest anything of the sort.
Youve seen what you wanted to see i guess.
And then you argued that Agger and Skrtel werent experienced, and looked a bit silly.
I agree with Oncey's point of people finding loads of positives in players we're linked to or sign that they wouldn't ordinarily. Obviously you expect partisan viewpoints but they can be frustrating if taken to far.
As for Toure, I'm in the "wait and see who else we sign / release" camp.
Article I read earlier but came across this one now:
"Manchester City central defender Kolo Toure has taken a significant pay cut to join Liverpool."
Liverpool have now confirmed Cheshire Today Sport’s story that the out-of-contract player is to sign for the club when the transfer window opens.
The signing is the first step in manager Brendan Rodgers strategy to radically restructure his defence.
The player has signed a two year contract with the club, but taken a major haircut in terms of pay. At City he was thought to be on £85,000 a week, the Liverpool package is closer to £60,000.
The signing represents a good piece of business for Rodgers, as Toure’s performances when he was called into the City team last season suggested he still has a lot to offer.
There's nothing GREAT about toure being at liverpool. He really is quite poor. I understand that rodgers wants leaders and players with winning mentality in the team, but toure isn't the answer. He's here now(or will be) so of course i'll support him and im hoping he proves the majority of us wrong and makes me eat the sweetest of humble pie.Great news if true.