I personally think if we add a proven quality attacking player to the signings we have already made, that's a great summer. If not, it's quite a poor one.
So we are one signing away from a great summer. Excellent.
I personally think if we add a proven quality attacking player to the signings we have already made, that's a great summer. If not, it's quite a poor one.
So we are one signing away from a great summer. Excellent.
So we are one signing away from a great summer. Excellent.
So we are one signing away from a great summer. Excellent.
I dunno. Last summer was really poor in the transfer market and the frustration builds when you see the same pattern re-emerging. We have lost one of the world's best players. Replacing him with Remy and Lambert and a couple of young'uns won't do. Not to mention the glaring weaknesses at FB. Current rumours notwithstanding (sorry for that word.)
I personally think if we add a proven quality attacking player to the signings we have already made, that's a great summer. If not, it's quite a poor one.
If you are getting frustrated at this stage of the transfer window, then it boils down to impatience on your own part.
Yeah... but its pretty much dependent on us making that special signing.
He may have found brilliance at Liverpool, but he was more established than any of our signings so far and had displayed considerable talent on the world stage.
We need some proven quality to arrive this summer.
Really hard to disagree with any of that, Rodgers does seem to have been hypocritical in his 'quality over quantity' comments this summer but there is some time to go so we have to wait and see on that one.
I get and am content with the Lambert and Remy signings but if they along with Markovic/Origi are our only forward signings this summer then it would be a massive load of shit, we are crying out for another wide attacker, a top quality established one as well, if Sanchez wasn't controlled by a woman then we might have got him and it would have been perfect for us considering what has happened, surely not many complaints if we had signed Sanchez, Markovic, Remy, Lambert and Origi, Di Maria is the alternative to Sanchez, it looks like there is a chance Madrid don't want him anymore and need some spending money, if that's the case we should go balls out to get him, why not?
Totally agree with the psychological bit you mention, at the moment its many more questions than answers and a bit of a shrug of the shoulders to most of it, we need a shot in the arm, look what happened when Arsenal signed Ozil and the boost that gave the whole club, they absolutely flew from that momentum and positivity in the first few months.
.Poppy cock, he was solid in the Dutch league and had a very good World Cup. That's hardly established except maybe in a 50/50 hindsight kind of way. None of the big clubs were in for him, just like this summer for the targets we are looking at
It was a gamble like all these signings are. Nobody thought he could surpass Torres. Yet he did. And nobody did, so I don't want any chancers or spoofers on here claiming they did. It was thought he would add some flair, but wasn't seen as a goalscorer of the same level.
Face it, we won't know if we have signed a new precocious talent, until the results are in.
Unless you want to sign a big name on the way down.
If you are getting frustrated at this stage of the transfer window, then it boils down to impatience on your own part.
Yes they spent a fortune on a player who gave them a cosmetic boost for a few months before he became captain windy and had no negligible influence on the rest of the season, so that everyone is wondering if he was worth the money, hardly a good long term buy.
This example doesn't make me want to go out and splash the cash
He's only venting a bit and voicing some of his concerns. Are you only allowed to do that at the end of the transfer window?
Oh no, then he'll have to wait in order to give the new signings and the manager time. So perhaps in 2 years he might be able to express his feelings / opinions.
This happens every year and I can never understand why some people have to give others shit for supposedly "complaining" or being impatient. Does every post really need to carry a disclaimer stating "this is just how I feel at the moment, I realize there are several weeks left and that I might be worrying for nothing, please don't patronize me".
It would be different if we hadn't signed anyone, were broke or weren't linked to anyone. But we've been linked to loads of players, apparently have loads of money and have signed lots of players already. We also all know we are going to sign more players....there isn't even a slither of a reason to think we aren't. He hasn't even waited a full week since we sold Suarez.
There was recognition of all that though. It was more about the players we have signed and are being linked to.
Anyways, it doesn't really matter. I don't want to spend the evening defending someone else's posts. It just kinda annoys me when people get jumped on unnecessarily (in my view) for complaining.
Arsenal finished the season before in great form. Not sure he actually did give that much of a boost.
Soz Silver Sean.
I don't know about baseball, but I wonder what FSG's attitude towards losing a star player is? Maybe they're happy to refill the team with a handful of good players when they lose an excellent one? Or do they like to get another excellent player in? They may have been burnt with carroll, but maybe at the time they thought they were swapping excellent with excellent?
...........
I'm not sure who this dynamic box to box guy you want is @moron? It's seems to me like a description of Jordan Henderson, one of our best and most important players last season. Now we have another one of those in Lallana, imo Rodgers plan is for those two either side of Gerrard or whoever is playing deepest.
It was just an example of how signing a big player can give everyone a lift and have a positive effect on and off the pitch, no more no less, Ozil turning out to be shit coward is irrelevant.
I don't think it is mate. We want more than a cosmetic lift, on a expensive player, that ends up being a probable disappointment.
.
Suarez was a gamble, but to a lesser degree. Luis Suarez was capped 30 times by his country and had scored 81 goals in 110 games prior to joining us.
None of Remy, Lambert, Lallana, and Markovic are close to that. That's why Luis Suarez was more established than our current signings, and why arguing otherwise makes you look like a fucking cretin.
Really, you want to join the debating club of hindsights and insults? Nice moderating there mate.
Klass Huntelaar 328 appearances, 210 goals for clubs. 35 goals in 25 appearances for Holland.
Tremendous record: That doesn't mean he'd be a success in England.
Still a risky signing and a gamble, just as Suarez was.
There's no such thing as gambles and lesser gambles until after the fact. There's been a world of players that came to England that should have made it and didn't - and vice versa.
But you enjoy your hindsight over there mate. Next you'll be telling us you knew he'd surpass Torres.
What does moron want by box to box ? - I will tell you, it seems we have expanded the squad but more than anything what we will miss of Suarez more than his goals - is his determination and doggedness to battle on. I know there are no players out there that will have that and the goals that Suarez scored and to be honest I am not that bothered regarding his goals as he was very hit and miss in the earlier seasons - it just so happened that it came together last season in terms of goal-scoring.
I just feel that overall - yes more quality squad on paper but when the going gets tough will the likes of Lallana, Markovic run for cover ? will they fight for the team ? or are they going to hang around waiting for the ball to be dropped at their feet ? that is what worries me. I don't know if Henderson will reproduce the form of last season, as I have this view that a really good player will play good from season one and that is is minimum level. If a player is bought and he plays badly from the start or is not noticeable on the pitch like Henderson was in his first two seasons then I think that is his natural level, and that worries me in case like a drug addict he goes back to his first two season's showing. Strange and complicated but I just want a fighter in that team and right now I cannot see one. Rodgers is relying too much on passing/move tactics winning the day when sometimes you need that c*nt in the middle to drive a team, I really hope that Suarez's contribution in terms of his fighting character is not lost on our manager and that he realizes that that is what he needs to purchase for the team.
Can I also just say that I think too much unnecessary fuss is made of missing the goals that Suarez scored. I would say that at a maximum 5-7 goals were down to his magic but the rest can be replicated by other members of the team through creating chances for others in the team.
Localny - you are absolutely right on this. When we signed him - I don't remember anyone on here saying what a great goalscorer he was, and if someone did then the depression on this site after Torres had left would not have been so apparent. Whenever you sign someone from the Dutch league - it is always a gamble. Also when Suarez joined us - I distinctly remember him missing loads of chances in his first two seasons, along with the rest of the team. Had he scored those chances then perhaps Kenny would still be in charge of LFC. He came good in this league last season - where everything clicked for him.