The spelling is spot on and yes, I liked him too. He was excellent in the air and the only real partner, as opposed to hod-carrier, Owen's ever had.We also forgot Karl-Heinz Riedle, or however you spell it
Yessir.Yesil?
has can ever scored a goal for fuck's sake?
It hit Terry and then Cahill. That level of skill means it's not an own goal.I consider that an own goal
Woah,hang on. Heskey was amazing in his first full season. Far better than reidle ever was.The spelling is spot on and yes, I liked him too. He was excellent in the air and the only real partner, as opposed to hod-carrier, Owen's ever had.
I stand by what I said. Owen was out for much of that season and Heskey took his place as point man in the attack. When Owen came back Heskey was reduced to fetching and carrying for him, as was Shearer for England over the years. I agree with macca's summary of Heskey overall, but I have a degree of sympathy for the way he was shoehorned into a workhorse role which never really suited him, instead of being let loose to go at defences the way he did in that first season.Woah,hang on. Heskey was amazing in his first full season. Far better than reidle ever was.
Shame he couldn't keep it up
2000-2001.Was he ever really 'amazing'? For a whole season? I think we've had this discussion before, but personally I don't remember him like that. He never quite looked like the almost unplayable striker he seemed when playing against us for Leicester. In his first season his bright moments helped obscure his infuriatingly naff ones, but the truth is surely that he was never anything but a maddeningly inconsistent player.
Owen played 46 times and scored 24 goals that season, and was our top scorer, with Heskey just two goals behind.I stand by what I said. Owen was out for much of that season and Heskey took his place as point man in the attack. When Owen came back Heskey was reduced to fetching and carrying for him, as was Shearer for England over the years. I agree with macca's summary of Heskey overall, but I have a degree of sympathy for the way he was shoehorned into a workhorse role which never really suited him, instead of being let loose to go at defences the way he did in that first season.
He was, he was unplayable at times that year. I think between he, Owen and Fowler we bagged 50-60 goals. His rapid decline was staggering though. He went from bossing some of the best defenders in Europe, to becoming a player who's match performance would depend on his first touch of the ball in the game, which generally involved him losing it and then spending the rest of the match feigning injury everytime someone so much as touched him. If we're talking about weak mentalities when discussing Sturridge, then Emile is the original. But you're right, him and Owen were unstoppable that year, with Fowler in reserve, that's about as good as it gets.2000-2001.
22 goals. Three trophies. A hat-trick against Derby.
He was *really* good that season.
Yes, but remember the number of games we played in a season where we went all the way in three Cup competitions. Heskey did play in Owen's place up top when scoring a lot of his goals. He was certainly better for us individually than Riedle (though I doubt that would have been the case had Riedle come to us in his prime), but Riedle's experience and aerial prowess helped Owen enormously when Owen first came into the side.Owen played 46 times and scored 24 goals that season, and was our top scorer, with Heskey just two goals behind.
I wouldn't go quite that far. Riedle was in the home stretch of his career when he arrived anyway and was quite often out through injury. They played together a fair bit and Owen thrived on Riedle's flick-ons (way more than on Heskey's) and general experience.Owen replaced Riedle really. As Owen came in and was too good to keep out the side Riedle got less playing time.
Fowler and Collymore were first choice, then Owen came through and Stan had his injuries and troubles, so Owen came to the fore, coupled with Fowlers own injury problems. Riedle came in (Stan left) and more or less partnered Owen for a season before eventually being ousted by him, but he taught him a shitload of stuff.Owen replaced Riedle really. As Owen came in and was too good to keep out the side Riedle got less playing time.
Then Heskey came in and as the perfect foil for Owen for the best part of two seasons. Fowler returned and made alot of appearances but was arguably 3rd in the pecking order with Houllier (Owen started the FA Cup Final, Fowler the League Cup Final), but between them they scored shitloads during the treble season:
Fowler 17 goals in 48 apps
Owen 24 goals in 46 apps
Heskey 22 goals in 56 apps
Owen made more starts than Fowler, Heskey was the ever present with us being more careful with both Owen and Fowler. That's a amazing return for a season without winning the league. 63 goals.
No he didn't. Riedle was sidelined by Owen. Owen's best partner was Heskey. And Owen himself would tell you the same.I wouldn't go quite that far. Riedle was in the home stretch of his career when he arrived anyway and was quite often out through injury. They played together a fair bit and Owen thrived on Riedle's flick-ons (way more than on Heskey's) and general experience.
Agree with you. No idea what he actually is. I'm hoping Klopp knows. I can imagine that at peak fitness he could become a very decent central midfielder. Let's hope so anyway.Can has been a strange player for me, he's looked capable of excellence at times, which has been overshadowed by indecisiveness, sluggish play and performances littered with inconsistency. Yet he still appeals to me as one of our few players capable of becoming a top class player.
Yesterday he seemed to be let off the leash and invigorated. Chasing everything, sharper, passing long and short with ease and crucially, more confident.
I don't think playing in defense helped, it exposed him to errors that can dent trust. I don't completely blame Rodgers for this, he played at centre half at previous clubs and at international level too, but I think most will agree that he's always been seen as a midfielder.
What type of midfielder though? His bursts forward suggest a box to box type, but this is often undone by an obvious lack of stamina and/or fitness. As a DM his lack of defensive instinct is often shown by his inability to hold position, to track runners or to break up the play.
So what does the future hold for him, and where? I think he's got the potential to be great and I think Klopp will instill confidence in him - being a fellow countryman helps too, surely. Anyone?
I can see why some are saying that, but I don't think he should be moulded into anything TBH. We should make sure we know what his strengths are and build on those. My guess is he'll turn out to be more of a midfield runner than a deeper-lying Alonso type, provided his fitness improves (without which he won't make it anyway).He should be moulded into the Xabi Alonso type if you ask me....
He would be perfect for this kind of role, he seems to have the eye for a pass.