• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Wing-backs

Status
Not open for further replies.

Buddha

Very Well-Known
Member
So it seems Brendan thinks he might have reinvented the wheel with his new-fangled 3-4-1-2.

That given, given everyone's fit, who do you fancy as our rampaging wing-backs?

On the left:
Enrique might appear made for the role given his good cameos at left wing last season. He's strong, fairly quick, but woefully one-footed and somewhat erratic.
Cissokho similarly would appear well-suited to the role. Quick, strong and looks to have a decent cross in him.

I'd give Cissokho a run on his return.

On the right:
Johnson has his doubters, but he's an engine and should benefit from knowing he's got 3 CB's and a covering DM as insurance to his runs down the right. A solid option.
Kelly made an initial splash at RB with is barnstorming runs down the flank. Has pace and good crossing ability, but has looked a shadow of his early promise in reserve games (albeit at CB).
Sterling has emerged as a potential option in this new role of late having put in a heroic 2nd half effort at right-back for the reserves a couple of weeks back. His lightening pace and deft touch might prove a real weapon should Rodgers think his defensive inexperience is less of a risk in this system.
Henderson? No.

Johnson's the obvious choice with Sterling as back-option/sub option (could always switch Johnson to the left).

Thoughts?
 
We have seen what Johnson can do at rightback, flaws and all. So it'd be interesting to see him play wingback. I think he can be a revelation because some defensive shackles are freed and he can go all out offensively. Cissokho is the same way.
 
We are blessed with some excellent CB's, Agger, Skrtel, Sakho, Toure, Ilori, Wisdom etc and have no problem if Rodgers wants to play to this strength by fielding 3 of them BUT we need to get the "wing-backs" right to get the full benefit of having 3 solid units defending our goal i.e. we need RAMPAGING full backs who will augment the attack almost continually.

Glenjo would be ideal for the role but obviously isn't available; Henderson is a huge NO as is Kelly as they are not quick or agile enough. Wisdom would be the worst option as he should only ever be used as a CB.

This brings us to McLaughlin. Admittedly I've only seen him play 3 or 4 full games and a few highlights but he looks absolutely made for the wing back role. Very fast, very skillful, very direct and very energetic - I would love to know why he's not been given a look-in yet. I'm not doubting Rodgers decision not to include him yet but from what I've seen he seems at least as ready for 1st team action as Sterling or Ibe.

3 CB's with McLaughlin/Glenjo and Sterling as wing backs could be hugely exciting but 3 CB's with Henderson and Enrique as wing backs detracts from the advantage of 3 CB's.


---------------Toure--------------Skrtel--------------Sakho------------
Glenjo-----------------------------------------------------------------------Sterling
(McLaughlin)-------------------Henderson--------------------------------------
----------------------Gerrard------------------------Coutinho----------------
---------------------------Suarez------------Sturridge----------------------


That's a very solid team defensively and plenty of firepower. Henderson and Sterling are not ideal candidates for those roles but the best we have avialable*.

* I haven't seen enough of Cissoko to judge whether he'd make a better wing-back than Sterling.
 
The problem with that Sky screen is that it needs to make formations and tactics appear far more rigid and simplistic than they actually are because otherwise it would end up being a visual mess. If they really analysed how fluidly Rodgers wants the team to play Carra would look like he's playing a solo game of twister. So for all the smugness of Sky in thinking they're being so progressive, they're actually being the opposite.
 
The problem with that Sky screen is that it needs to make formations and tactics appear far more rigid and simplistic than they actually are because otherwise it would end up being a visual mess. If they really analysed how fluidly Rodgers wants the team to play Carra would look like he's playing a solo game of twister. So for all the smugness of Sky in thinking they're being so progressive, they're actually being the opposite.


If you go on and compare that screen to the flipchart Roy Hodgson uses to draw his tactics out on, Sky and Carragher are comfortably ahead of the FA and their England manager.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom