There's a lot of talk of us needing commanding centre back(s) and defensive midfielder.
While I'm not against that, for me the second goal last night and the countless goals we've conceded, and the countless chances we've given opposition teams on the counter attack to me suggests that perhaps what we need are very pacy centre backs and a quick midfielder (Mascher/Momo speed) so we can be more comfortable during counter attacks that we're inevitably going to be on the end of, considering Rodger's vulnerable system.
Our other issue of conceding or looking gash during set pieces also to me is more about the system. When Rafa was around, even with all the press we got about zonal marking, we conceded very little. We had, I think, 5 players in front of goal that stayed where they were in the most dangerous positions, while another four players manmarked further out to chase the runs.
Right now we're only manmarking so we're relying completely on the provision our players will never lose their man. But it inevitably happens.
Changing that may well help us get better results.
Obviously having players that are both athletic and commanding is the best, but given the choice of either I'd be looking for more pace within our current approach to games, and some change in tactics when defending set pieces.
Or do others see it differently?
While I'm not against that, for me the second goal last night and the countless goals we've conceded, and the countless chances we've given opposition teams on the counter attack to me suggests that perhaps what we need are very pacy centre backs and a quick midfielder (Mascher/Momo speed) so we can be more comfortable during counter attacks that we're inevitably going to be on the end of, considering Rodger's vulnerable system.
Our other issue of conceding or looking gash during set pieces also to me is more about the system. When Rafa was around, even with all the press we got about zonal marking, we conceded very little. We had, I think, 5 players in front of goal that stayed where they were in the most dangerous positions, while another four players manmarked further out to chase the runs.
Right now we're only manmarking so we're relying completely on the provision our players will never lose their man. But it inevitably happens.
Changing that may well help us get better results.
Obviously having players that are both athletic and commanding is the best, but given the choice of either I'd be looking for more pace within our current approach to games, and some change in tactics when defending set pieces.
Or do others see it differently?