I am awaiting Van Gaal to sack the board and replace them with who he thinks fit into his style....
Van Gal
- Thread starter Insignificance
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
Sounds a bit like what happened at Ajax with Johan Cruyff.
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...-gaal-v-cruyff-civil-war-at-ajax-6947507.html
Van Gaal lost in the end.
https://www.theblizzard.co.uk/articles/the-velvet-revolution/
The first article is fascinating. The second one goes on a bit but is also quite interesting.
In fairness to both Cruyff and van Gaal, they're hardly the only high profile Dutchies from the world of football who could start a ruck in an empty room.
In fairness to both Cruyff and van Gaal, they're hardly the only high profile Dutchies from the world of football who could start a ruck in an empty room.
Manchester United boss Louis Van-Shit-Face Gaal snubbed Liverpool job
LOUIS VAN GAAL has revealed he could have been in charge of Liverpool and not Manchester United in today’s big battle at Anfield.
By Paul Hetherington / Published 22nd March 2015
Van Gaal held talks with Liverpool three years ago before Brendan Rodgers Kopped the Anfield job. But the Dutchman could not reach agreement with Liveroool and instead returned to a previous role in charge of Holland, after leaving Bayern Munich the previous year.
The United boss faces Liverpool today insisting: “Yes, I spoke to Liverpool but that is not so interesting anymore.
“Last week I was asked the same about Tottenham. I have spoken to a lot of clubs. It’s not so interesting – it’s in the past.
“It’s not good for Liverpool, Tottenham or me to re-open things that are in the past.
“Yes, it was very pleasing. I could have worked every year but I take sabbaticals to please my wife, my kids and my grandchildren.
“But I was always in the circumstances to manage a club – I’m a lucky guy.”
MAN UTD MAN: Louis van Gaal held talks with Liverpool in the past [GETTY]
When asked if he had regrets about not going to Liverpool, LVG said: “I’m not going to answer that because it’s in the past and we are now in the present.
"I am the manager of Manchester United – the No. 1 club in England but Liverpool also has a very good record in its history.
“But I’m the coach of United – I can only speak about Liverpool as an opponent but not as a club of mine.”
It is understood that Van Gaal could not agree on his precise role with Liverpool, who saw him as a Director of Football in charge of a coaching team.
Van Gaal, 63, confirmed United will be his last job – but insists he does not know how long he will be in the role.
He said: “I can confirm it will be my last job but there could be five years to go yet.
“I can extend my contract – you never know.
“I’m in a situation where I signed for three years, because you can build something up in that time and the club agreed with that.
“I don’t know how I would react in the circumstances if Manchester United asked me to extend and if I should do that.”
LOUIS VAN GAAL has revealed he could have been in charge of Liverpool and not Manchester United in today’s big battle at Anfield.
By Paul Hetherington / Published 22nd March 2015
Van Gaal held talks with Liverpool three years ago before Brendan Rodgers Kopped the Anfield job. But the Dutchman could not reach agreement with Liveroool and instead returned to a previous role in charge of Holland, after leaving Bayern Munich the previous year.
The United boss faces Liverpool today insisting: “Yes, I spoke to Liverpool but that is not so interesting anymore.
“Last week I was asked the same about Tottenham. I have spoken to a lot of clubs. It’s not so interesting – it’s in the past.
“It’s not good for Liverpool, Tottenham or me to re-open things that are in the past.
“Yes, it was very pleasing. I could have worked every year but I take sabbaticals to please my wife, my kids and my grandchildren.
“But I was always in the circumstances to manage a club – I’m a lucky guy.”
MAN UTD MAN: Louis van Gaal held talks with Liverpool in the past [GETTY]
When asked if he had regrets about not going to Liverpool, LVG said: “I’m not going to answer that because it’s in the past and we are now in the present.
"I am the manager of Manchester United – the No. 1 club in England but Liverpool also has a very good record in its history.
“But I’m the coach of United – I can only speak about Liverpool as an opponent but not as a club of mine.”
It is understood that Van Gaal could not agree on his precise role with Liverpool, who saw him as a Director of Football in charge of a coaching team.
Van Gaal, 63, confirmed United will be his last job – but insists he does not know how long he will be in the role.
He said: “I can confirm it will be my last job but there could be five years to go yet.
“I can extend my contract – you never know.
“I’m in a situation where I signed for three years, because you can build something up in that time and the club agreed with that.
“I don’t know how I would react in the circumstances if Manchester United asked me to extend and if I should do that.”
I remember a few years ago it was being reported that his reps were whoring his name all over Europe. He's been linked with everybody sometime.
I've been in talks with lots of great companies too, most of the conversations have centered around them telling me to fuck off and stop ringing them.
I dont know how i can console myself if we lose to this cunt one more time...
So we couldn't reach agreement with him?
He said "Go on, giz a job".
We said "No, fuck off you insane Dutch cunt"
He said "Go on, giz a job".
We said "No, fuck off you insane Dutch cunt"
He lost six million euro investing in the Ponzi scheme in 2009.
He seemed happy enough at AZ but needed more cash after it.
Manchester United boss Louis Van-Shit-Face Gaal snubbed Liverpool job
LOUIS VAN GAAL has revealed he could have been in charge of Liverpool and not Manchester United in today’s big battle at Anfield.
By Paul Hetherington / Published 22nd March 2015
Van Gaal held talks with Liverpool three years ago before Brendan Rodgers Kopped the Anfield job. But the Dutchman could not reach agreement with Liveroool and instead returned to a previous role in charge of Holland, after leaving Bayern Munich the previous year.
The United boss faces Liverpool today insisting: “Yes, I spoke to Liverpool but that is not so interesting anymore.
“Last week I was asked the same about Tottenham. I have spoken to a lot of clubs. It’s not so interesting – it’s in the past.
“It’s not good for Liverpool, Tottenham or me to re-open things that are in the past.
“Yes, it was very pleasing. I could have worked every year but I take sabbaticals to please my wife, my kids and my grandchildren.
“But I was always in the circumstances to manage a club – I’m a lucky guy.”
MAN UTD MAN: Louis van Gaal held talks with Liverpool in the past [GETTY]
When asked if he had regrets about not going to Liverpool, LVG said: “I’m not going to answer that because it’s in the past and we are now in the present.
"I am the manager of Manchester United – the No. 1 club in England but Liverpool also has a very good record in its history.
“But I’m the coach of United – I can only speak about Liverpool as an opponent but not as a club of mine.”
It is understood that Van Gaal could not agree on his precise role with Liverpool, who saw him as a Director of Football in charge of a coaching team.
Van Gaal, 63, confirmed United will be his last job – but insists he does not know how long he will be in the role.
He said: “I can confirm it will be my last job but there could be five years to go yet.
“I can extend my contract – you never know.
“I’m in a situation where I signed for three years, because you can build something up in that time and the club agreed with that.
“I don’t know how I would react in the circumstances if Manchester United asked me to extend and if I should do that.”
When I saw the headline above I thought you might have put the whole page through Pornolize. 😉
- Status
Similar threads
