• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

RAWK mentalists

Forums Unread posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
[quote author=Asim link=topic=41359.msg1156862#msg1156862 date=1282165462]
Didn't people from here start with people from Est a while back?

It's like you lot love to pick a fight cos you get bored of kickin each around the forum
[/quote]

after the recent zlatan abuse we need someone else to kick about
 
Heh.

Stuck my oar in in the Carra thread, but they generally tend to ignore reason.

Saw a thread going on about how they *GASP!* accidentally allowed a match thread to take place, and how it shouldn't be allowed to happen because people get to *SHOCK HORROR!* express their opinions in there.

Freakydeaky
 
Liverpool v Trabsonspor OFFICIAL THREAD

And Big Daddy belly flops the Haystack

Oooooooohhhhhh. The crows winces.

But......look....just as Big Daddy sense victory, Kendo Nagasaki, like a bolt of lightning, flashes into the ring and forearm smashes Daddy and knocks him out for the count.



























Liverpool won 2-0
 
[quote author=Stulikesdrums link=topic=41359.msg1156899#msg1156899 date=1282168789]
Oh yeah, I forgot they don't allow match threads over there. Loony cunts.
[/quote]

hahahahaha. They dont?

See I post there very rarely, but mostly get ignored, you have to repeat reason about 17 times to get any kind of response, & it usually makes no relation to what you were saying.
 
An Error Has Occurred! Sorry singlerider, you are banned from using this forum!
Because.
Your ban is not set to expire.
Click to expand...

Is there a reason in there?

Otherwise I can't really see what I've been banned for, other than saying the slating of Carra was out of order.

They're faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar worse than Koptalk ever was
 
Maybe they're on to this thread SR....either that or they really are the thought police
 
And what?

I'm not even allowed to express an opinion on another site without getting banned on theirs?

They need to have a fucking word if that's the case, even Dunk wasn't *that* bad
 
Somebody should show this link to Gareth and the other mods on RAWK:

http://www.redandwhitekop.com/about.php

I can only assume this was a joke / forgotten about ?


Welcome to the Red and White Kop website.

Please take a couple of minutes to read about what this site is, and what it is not - it will give you ideas on how to get most from the site.

What this site is NOT.

1. Official. This site has neither official nor formal connection with Liverpool Football Club and Athletic Grounds plc.

2. A Business. We are not part of any media conglomeration; we do not have a constitution; we do not exist as a company, formal partnership, nor other business. We don't have a bank account. We're not trying to sell you anything. No-one is paid for their input to the site. We do not carry adverts.

3. A Pressure Group. The site hosts a lot of opinions on issues concerning the practicalities of being a Liverpool fan. There are some organised pressure groups and constituted organisations campaigning on the issues which may be discussed from time to time but this site is not the website of any such group. To be very clear: this is not the website of ILSA (The Independent Liverpool Supporters Association), Anfield Forever, Free Michael Shields nor the Hillsborough Justice Campaign, although many of the contributors to this site are members and committed supporters of those campaigns.

4. The News. Red and White Kop (or RAWK as we're often known) does not set out to be a news site on Liverpool FC; there are dozens of sites that do that, and we provide you with a full clickable index of their latest headlines in the Latest News section of the site. For breaking news we recommend you to look in that section and check the latest news stories.

5. Polite. You will find the whole spectrum of match-going vernacular here. (Eh ? You wha' ? The articles and features may contain swearing, mother. You best go make the tea.)

6. Very Serious. We have been told that the format of the site may make it look serious at first glance. We're not - remember that !

7. Censorious. You can say what you like how you like. The editorial policy will not impinge on what you say unless you're abusive, a racist, a homophobe, or promoting illegal activity.
Click to expand...
 
I mean - it's not even like I slagged them off.

They genuinely don't let match threads happen because people can express opinions in them. Only preordained, vetted, party-line posters are allowed to run a match commentary.

And that is weird.

If they can't handle somebody pointing out that that is a bit weird, that just makes it even more weird.

They must have a very fragile ego if they feel the need to ban somebody for saying this on another site. They're like the North Korea of Liverpool sites.

I'm surprised they don't ban match commentary altogether if Lucas isn't playing
 
[quote author=SaintGeorge67 link=topic=41359.msg1156928#msg1156928 date=1282171297]
Point 7 seems rather odd...
[/quote]

Freedom to think Lucas is shite probably falls under Illegal activity for them.
 
IT's because everyone that registers lately is purely going on to have a pop and inform them how big a pack of cunts they actually are.
 
What's with Asim getting all cuntish about us giving them shit?

They deserve it, I joined their forum to find out for myself what it was like and discuss football with other fans on another forum for something different. There was no discussion on there, it was their way or the highway. My initial posts were balanced, backed up and meant to raise debate, instead I got a tirade of abuse and questioned just short of the Spanish inquisition with requests for me to provide full written documents to back up my opinion. For a site that 'hates' the sports media, they put alot of credence in any article that has a 'quote' in it.

They're cunts, they deserved it and I hope their site crashes and burns, and I'm not being answerable to anyone for it, I tried to be reasonable and they acted like a bunch of fucked up morons.
 
[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=41359.msg1157019#msg1157019 date=1282205928]
What's with Asim getting all cuntish about us giving them shit?

They deserve it, I joined their forum to find out for myself what it was like and discuss football with other fans on another forum for something different. There was no discussion on there, it was their way or the highway. My initial posts were balanced, backed up and meant to raise debate, instead I got a tirade of abuse and questioned just short of the Spanish inquisition with requests for me to provide full written documents to back up my opinion. For a site that 'hates' the sports media, they put alot of credence in any article that has a 'quote' in it.

They're cunts, they deserved it and I hope their site crashes and burns, and I'm not being answerable to anyone for it, I tried to be reasonable and they acted like a bunch of fucked up morons.
[/quote]

I believe it because i) he's frequently a bore ii) has the habit of self-appointing himself as the bastion of what should/ should not be allowed on the site. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

I agree re RAWK - its actually unbelieveable how mental they are - no surprise that (apparently) when RedCafe or one of the other Manc sites needs a topic to inflame the populace, they go hunting on RAWK.
 
[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=41359.msg1157049#msg1157049 date=1282208356]
Did I mention Gareth is a twat?
[/quote]

HA! Gareth is "the full twat".
 
[quote author=Asim link=topic=41359.msg1156862#msg1156862 date=1282165462]
Didn't people from here start with people from Est a while back?

It's like you lot love to pick a fight cos you get bored of kickin each around the forum
[/quote]

"You lot"

Dead give away.

He's not one of us. Total plant CUNT. Since he's not with us he's holding us back. Normally I'd have Bamba whisper sweet nothings into my ear from the Huang P.R. department, but he's been silent, which can only mean that the Carragher-Kirdi syndicate has got to him.

So, there's only really one way to go. Delete his posts, lock the thread, ban the fucker.
 
By the way, the PM he was responding to was mine. Note that he didn't quote the whole thing, which was quite reasonable, in an "allow me to expound upon your failings" sort of way.
 
[quote author=SaintGeorge67 link=topic=41359.msg1157053#msg1157053 date=1282208443]
You wouldn't mind him Mark if you agreed with everything he said/thought.
[/quote]

Ha! Really? His attitude completely fucked me off. It reminded me of koptalk towards the end when Dunk went mental on everyone.
 
[quote author=grjt link=topic=41359.msg1157046#msg1157046 date=1282207785]
[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=41359.msg1157019#msg1157019 date=1282205928]
What's with Asim getting all cuntish about us giving them shit?

They deserve it, I joined their forum to find out for myself what it was like and discuss football with other fans on another forum for something different. There was no discussion on there, it was their way or the highway. My initial posts were balanced, backed up and meant to raise debate, instead I got a tirade of abuse and questioned just short of the Spanish inquisition with requests for me to provide full written documents to back up my opinion. For a site that 'hates' the sports media, they put alot of credence in any article that has a 'quote' in it.

They're cunts, they deserved it and I hope their site crashes and burns, and I'm not being answerable to anyone for it, I tried to be reasonable and they acted like a bunch of fucked up morons.
[/quote]

I believe it because i) he's frequently a bore ii) has the habit of self-appointing himself as the bastion of what should/ should not be allowed on the site. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

I agree re RAWK - its actually unbelieveable how mental they are - no surprise that (apparently) when RedCafe or one of the other Manc sites needs a topic to inflame the populace, they go hunting on RAWK.
[/quote]


You're definitely right about the Redcafe angle..the 'RAWK meltdown' thread was from there and was basically alking about Rafa's sacking.

They were ecstatic watching the fireworks.

They were less happy with Hodgson's appointment thogh as they all liked him; not many thought he'd be any good though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

rurikbird
    • Like
  • Locked
Are we better than we thought?
2 3
Replies
84
Views
2K
Frogfish
Frogfish
rurikbird
    • Like
Different Gravy
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Replies
458
Views
12K
darkstarexodus
darkstarexodus
Squiggles
    • Like
  • Locked
05/10/2024 - Weeks Other Games Thread
2 3
Replies
60
Views
1K
rubans
rubans
Squiggles
    • Like
  • Locked
Other PL Games 24-25/08/2024
2 3 4 5 6
Replies
156
Views
3K
CueEye
C
Frogfish
    • Like
  • Locked
Trent on his new role
Replies
3
Views
464
Woland
Woland
Back
Top Bottom