I think Cook's captaincy is OK. The theory that it isn't seems mainly to have originated with Shane Warne and other Australians who are just making mischief.
But I don't think the criticism is limited to a few culprits
Cast your mind back to August 2013 and the only person criticising Cook was Warne who was pursuing his own agenda.
So what? He wasn't actually the only one, but there wasn't much point in strong criticism when the team was winning, even though he was doing nothing to win any praise. Plenty of people have criticised him now and quite justifiably. Do you GENUINELY think he's a bright, tactically astute and positive captain? We'll just have to disagree, then, it's no good claiming it's all Warne's fault.
I don't think you can lay into Cook's captaincy unless you can point to bad decisions he has made. I don't think he makes bad decisions. He doesn't tend to make inspired decisions either, which is why he will probably never go down as one of the great captains.He's just OK in my book.
You would need 15 men on the field to comply with the wishes of all those ex-England captains on the Sky Sports commentary team.
You would need 15 men on the field to comply with the wishes of all those ex-England captains on the Sky Sports commentary team.
Happily I listen to TMS but I get your point. Apart from Hussain they all seem quite smug and Strauss sounds way too reedy to be on TV. Give me Blowers, Aggers and Boycott any day.
I agree that Nasser Hussain is the best of the massed ranks of England captains in the Sky Sports box. He is that bit more perceptive than the others. Shane Warne's anti-Cook agenda is so blatant that I am not sure that he should be there at all, whatever you think of Cook!
On a more positive note, Jos Buttler has been keeping very well in the course of India's first innings, contrary to expert predictions! 🙂
I don't think you can lay into Cook's captaincy unless you can point to bad decisions he has made. I don't think he makes bad decisions. He doesn't tend to make inspired decisions either, which is why he will probably never go down as one of the great captains.He's just OK in my book.
If England don't win this test now they never will, its about time some of them know what its like to win a test match.
Tbh you're right, expecting England to win a game of cricket nowadays even from a position of strength isn't very wise.
He doesn't tend to actually do anything, that's the point, he doesn't have the ability to read the game in play and spot the most basic of things, he lets things go whether its his bowlers bowling wrong lines and lengths, defensive field placings when he should be looking at taking wickets, why do we so often spread the field to tailenders? at Lords on that green top the first ball that was actually hitting the stumps was bowled in the 11th over, that's mad, a competent captain would be on it with things like this and having a word with his bowlers after a few overs telling them to get it straighter/pitch it up and make the batsman play more, Cook just stands there oblivious way way more often than not.
The bowling short plan to Haddin in Oz was one of the most retarded things ever, they were still doing it come the 5th test! when it was blatantly clear very early on in the series that Haddin was more than happy and comfortable with the short stuff, it really was mind blowing how they just carried on doing it, why did Cook just continue to stand there letting it happen? any captain with anything about them would have put a stop to that.
The thing with England is they arn't encouraged or seemingly allowed to think for themselves, it isn't all Cooks fault that he isn't any good, a fair bit of it is management and all these pre-conceived plans for everything, everything has been micro analysed, mapped out and planned before hand, its almost designed so that no-one has to think, this is what is so fucked up with England, when these plans end up not working they look lost as to what to do next, free thinking and imagination has been bled out of them so the likes of Cook struggle when he has to think on his feet and do what seems like the obvious thing in game, other players are not encouraged to speak up and think either, its not the England way, it the 1 dimensional, robotic, yes man England way or the highway.
It is a worry for the new young players that they will get their heads and techniques ruined by this robot mentality enviroment in our cricket nowadays, look how it has ground down our senior players in the last couple of years, Stokes looks like hes the first newbie to crack already and its nothing to with him not being good enough, its more a question of can he beat the system? it really can't be best enviroment to get the best out of any player young and old, just look how young players fared under Flower and look at the state of our older players now after a few years under that regime.
This is why it needs a completely fresh approach, a clean slate for everyone.
Speaking of Flower, him in charge of the Lions is a twisted joke, his track record with young players is dreadful, he shouldn't be allowed anywhere near them, i really wish he would fuck off out of the whole set up.
Interesting post and if there is a criticism of Cook he does perservere with the plans for a little too long sometimes. However this is the way test cricket is played now by ALL the teams. Look how Australia analysed our batting shortcomings and executed their plans to perfection, you surely aren't suggesting Clarke just came up with them on the day! That is the way of the modern game - all test teams analyse the opposition to pinpoint weaknesses to get an advantage, the days of the captain doing this on the pitch have passed with the advent of slow motion replays on laptops I'm afraid. Clarke was forever looking up to his dressing room balcony for advice during both Ashes. Your comments on Stokes are pretty ludicrous, it wasn't the management who told him to punch a wall and break his hand was it. I thought he bowled pretty well in the last game.