Our midfield has functioned well without Gerrard, maybe because despite their limitations they add up to a better unit.
Now let's deal in reality - our midfield without Gerrard did a fine job of taking on Man City & Chelsea away - yet we get brutalised by Stoke away.
Now.... I'm happy enough to give Gerrard a crack at that role - but it's not his natural game.
We will have problems.
The question I have, Is this Rodgers making a tactical decision to play Gerrard deeper or is this Gerrard "wanting" a deeper role?
I think this is missing far too many factors, one of them being that it was our defense that was brutalised more than the midfield, I think we gave a reasonably good account of ourselves, we got stuck in and didn't allow them to bully us, as we often do, Gerrard in particular was putting himself about and getting stuck in particularly in the first half. I think we had issues keeping the ball, which has been an issue in ALOT of away games this season, but once again our Achilles heal was our inability to defend balls into the box when we're defending deep.
Yeah, Gerrard over did the Hollywood balls (a few did pay off though), as said, that's something he needs to limit, and yeah I agree that Hendo/Allen/Lucas looked the sum of their parts more. Let's not forget though, this was Gerrard's first full Premiership game back, if he wained a bit in the second half after a pulsating 60 minutes, then that's hardly surprising. I thought he and Lucas handled the midfield pretty well. People look at a couple of mistakes of a lack of communication for two of the goals, fair enough, it was sloppy play, but our defense can't be permently reliant on over protection from the midfield, they have to earn their crust too and far often than is justifiable, players like Johnson and Skrtel are caught ball watching and continuously fail to read the danger. It's a two way thing, the midfield is there to work as a unit and recognise danger and cut it out, when that doesn't happen we have players who aren't good enough when exposed. Is that the fault of the midfield aswell? Clearly we lack a couple of players, particularly two full backs, a dominant centre half (Sakho?) and an equally commanding midfielder, but yesterday when the midfield needed those behind them to hold their shape and work as a unit and to COMMUNICATE, it didn't happen, once again.