[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=47619.msg1430969#msg1430969 date=1322049934]
[quote author=Fabio link=topic=47619.msg1430948#msg1430948 date=1322048488]
So you admit he's a better passer than masch, and i think he's as good defensively, yet you'd rather change the way he plays so he goes forward more, leaving spaces behind him for the opposition to exploit?
I appreciate you wish we played a 2-1-7 but...christ....You can't justify DM who attacks partnering a CM who attacks, who in turn are joined by attacking fullbacks, as well as the wingers and strikers
Besides, have you seen the chelsea highlights (don't bother, i know you have) and lucas had the ball in the opposition half a lot.
Besides, he still puts forward some good fucking passes, even from his deep role!
[/quote]
I never said lucas was as good defensively than mash, I said he is the best holding midfielder we have.
if you attack more you are going to leave spaces that is the nature of the beast, no guts no glory. have many times have we drawn this season? 4? you could argue we gambled more lost two game and other the other two and we would have been better off (or we could have lost all four :laugh: )
[/quote]
.... but neil, we've paid a combined fee of over 100m for the supposed attacking members of the squad... Why should a 6m midfielder who does his job more than admirably be required to go gung ho too?
Carroll, suarez, henderson, downing, johnson, kuyt, adam, johnson, bellamy, maxi, spearing.....are all more than capable. Combine any 5 of them for the attack and we SHOULD be scoring more. Why risk our defensive stability when the form of others is whats costing us?