• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

LFC v WBA match thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
We lost solely because of johnsons mistake

Would we have won without it? Prob not. But we lost because of it
 
Our mind boggling inability to score is a far bigger issue than the occasional slip ups in defence. I know you know this. We concede ONE goal. At Anfield. Against West Brom. In the 75th minute. And you want to blame Johnson for the result?
 
Our mind boggling inability to score is a far bigger issue than the occasional slip ups in defence.

It might be, but consistent fuck ups by the same players is enough to raise alarm. And people saying it's ok because they offered something that essentially isn't their first and foremost priority is missing the point.

And as said a million times, if he's that fantastic an attacker, play him in an attacking position.
 
Whatever. I don't like sport any more. I'd say let's talk about art but everyone likes that stupid fucking giant show that's been on in town.

What did you all have for dinner?
 
Our mind boggling inability to score is a far bigger issue than the occasional slip ups in defence. I know you know this. We concede ONE goal. At Anfield. Against West Brom. In the 75th minute. And you want to blame Johnson for the result?

I'm blaming johnson for us conceding. The sole reason we lost.

We didn't win because of the front line. But we lost because of johnson
 
It might be, but consistent fuck ups by the same players is enough to raise alarm. And people saying it's ok because they offered something that essentially isn't their first and foremost priority is missing the point.

And as said a million times, if he's that fantastic an attacker, play him in an attacking position.

the attackers are given countless chances to stick the ball in the ball of the net but the defense are expected to be flawless in order to keep a clean sheet. how many should we have scored today? 3? 4? the WBA goal should have been a consolation not the winner.
 
Whatever. I don't like sport any more. I'd say let's talk about art but everyone likes that stupid fucking giant show that's been on in town.

What did you all have for dinner?

A sausage roll and a Hollands steak pie. Times are hard. Oh and 10 pints of Carling
 
the attackers are given countless chances to stick the ball in the ball of the net but the defense are expected to be flawless in order to keep a clean sheet. how many should we have scored today? 3? 4? the WBA goal should have been a consolation not the winner.

Correct

But we didn't score, did we? We lost a game because of a defensive error. We didn't win because of the attack
 
I'm blaming johnson for us conceding. The sole reason we lost.

We didn't win because of the front line. But we lost because of johnson
Call me crazy but I'll go out on a limb and suggest there is a link between scoring and not losing. I like you Fabio, but your line of reasoning makes no sense. Johnson is the sole reason we lost? You are unable to think of any other factors that may have contributed to our loss?
 
Can we lose if the defender doesn't do their job? Yes.
Can we lose if the strikers don't do their job? Not directly. If the defenders did their job then we should get a draw.
Johnson gave them a goal. Us scoring is irrelevant to us conceding.
 
the attackers are given countless chances to stick the ball in the ball of the net but the defense are expected to be flawless in order to keep a clean sheet. how many should we have scored today? 3? 4? the WBA goal should have been a consolation not the winner.

It wasn't a lapse in concentration that gave someone that split second to get in ahead of the marker from an attack though, it was 'another' moment of stupidity from someone who's supposed to be an International class defender.

I'll take that he's a good player, but he's a shockingly indifferent defender and the fact that we keep having this conversation, and the fact that this issue keeps raising debate at club and international level should be enough to set the alarm bells ringing.

And let's forget the 'well in a side that keeps the ball better he'd be a perfect acquisition' notion. Football isn't played on paper, it's played on a pitch in shitty conditions where large portions of the game are spent trying to win the ball back to rebuild an attack. When we haven't got the ball and he's asked to hold his position and adopt a defensive mentality and sensibility, he's consistently a weak link.
 
OK, I've had enough.....

Yo! Hold up! Time out! TIME OUT! Y'all take a chill! Ya need to cool that shit out! We're going around in circles. Same shit every time we lose. And that's the double truth, Ruth!


do-the-right-thing-20th-anniversary-20090623052837207-000.jpg
 
As 3 is 3 times as big a number as 1 I believe my argument holds. The front 6 deserves exactly 3 times more grief than Johnson.
 
You're right, our entire front line who didn't score are at fault. Not through a lack of trying however. All 5 (including hendo) are entirely at fault for us conceding a goal and losing.


Glen Johnson is a complete fucknut who continually costs us points though and earns us little.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom