Were gonna be here all night thinking:' fuck! Were signing Sinclair'

[Sunny]

Re: fuck! Were signing Sinclair

I like to see our Brazilian players passports

 

[IGotALuvlyBunchOfCoconuts]

Re: fuck! Were signing Sinclair

I'd rather Dyer then Sinclair. But I've seen very little of either.

 

[Modo]

Re: fuck! Were signing Sinclair

[quote author=IGotALuvlyBunchOfCoconuts link=topic=48183.msg1458889#msg1458889 date=1325940191]
I'd rather Dyer then Sinclair. But I've seen very little of either.
[/quote]

Isn't he a bit old and broken.

 

[HC]

Re: fuck! Were signing Sinclair

[quote author=Modo link=topic=48183.msg1458892#msg1458892 date=1325940412]
[quote author=IGotALuvlyBunchOfCoconuts link=topic=48183.msg1458889#msg1458889 date=1325940191]
I'd rather Dyer then Sinclair. But I've seen very little of either.
[/quote]

Isn't he a bit old and broken.
[/quote]

Nathan not Kieron

 

[Oncy]

Re: fuck! Were signing Sinclair

Im going to call him 'token'
Hope thats ok.

 

[Modo]

Re: fuck! Were signing Sinclair

[quote author=Hardcastle link=topic=48183.msg1458897#msg1458897 date=1325940697]
[quote author=Modo link=topic=48183.msg1458892#msg1458892 date=1325940412]
[quote author=IGotALuvlyBunchOfCoconuts link=topic=48183.msg1458889#msg1458889 date=1325940191]
I'd rather Dyer then Sinclair. But I've seen very little of either.
[/quote]

Isn't he a bit old and broken.
[/quote]

Nathan not Kieron
[/quote]

Well you should be specific.

 

[spider-Neil]

Re: fuck! Were signing Sinclair

am I the only one who saw the headline and thought of the sinclair who did that brilliant overhead kick?

guess I am... :-\

 

[Modo]

Re: fuck! Were signing Sinclair

[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=48183.msg1458905#msg1458905 date=1325942357]
am I the only one who saw the headline and thought of the sinclair who did that brilliant overhead kick?

guess I am... :-\
[/quote]

Trevor?

Hasn't he retired?

 

[spider-Neil]

Re: fuck! Were signing Sinclair

[quote author=Modo link=topic=48183.msg1458908#msg1458908 date=1325942750]
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=48183.msg1458905#msg1458905 date=1325942357]
am I the only one who saw the headline and thought of the sinclair who did that brilliant overhead kick?

guess I am... :-\
[/quote]

Trevor?

Hasn't he retired?
[/quote]

ah trevor! that's his name.

 

[ElMalarkey]

Re: fuck! Were signing Sinclair

He's been decent the few times I've seen him, but I think most times as a sub for Dyer? Not sure the club needs to sign an OK winger in the inflated January window. Swansea will demand 8-10M for a 4M player.

 

[themn]

Re: fuck! Were signing Sinclair

[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=48183.msg1458909#msg1458909 date=1325943017]
[quote author=Modo link=topic=48183.msg1458908#msg1458908 date=1325942750]
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=48183.msg1458905#msg1458905 date=1325942357]
am I the only one who saw the headline and thought of the sinclair who did that brilliant overhead kick?

guess I am... :-\
[/quote]

Trevor?

Hasn't he retired?
[/quote]

ah trevor! that's his name.
[/quote]

 

[Buddha]

Re: fuck! Were signing Sinclair

 

[HC]

Re: fuck! Were signing Sinclair

[quote author=Modo link=topic=48183.msg1458901#msg1458901 date=1325941464]
[quote author=Hardcastle link=topic=48183.msg1458897#msg1458897 date=1325940697]
[quote author=Modo link=topic=48183.msg1458892#msg1458892 date=1325940412]
[quote author=IGotALuvlyBunchOfCoconuts link=topic=48183.msg1458889#msg1458889 date=1325940191]
I'd rather Dyer then Sinclair. But I've seen very little of either.
[/quote]

Isn't he a bit old and broken.
[/quote]

Nathan not Kieron
[/quote]

Well you should be specific.
[/quote]

well you shouldn't be dim.

 

[spider-Neil]

Re: fuck! Were signing Sinclair

well 6CM seems to be on edge today...

 

[Modo]

Re: fuck! Were signing Sinclair

[quote author=Hardcastle link=topic=48183.msg1458914#msg1458914 date=1325944230]
[quote author=Modo link=topic=48183.msg1458901#msg1458901 date=1325941464]
[quote author=Hardcastle link=topic=48183.msg1458897#msg1458897 date=1325940697]
[quote author=Modo link=topic=48183.msg1458892#msg1458892 date=1325940412]
[quote author=IGotALuvlyBunchOfCoconuts link=topic=48183.msg1458889#msg1458889 date=1325940191]
I'd rather Dyer then Sinclair. But I've seen very little of either.
[/quote]

Isn't he a bit old and broken.
[/quote]

Nathan not Kieron
[/quote]

Well you should be specific.
[/quote]

well you shouldn't be dim.
[/quote]
Hey, Kieron is more famous than Nathan. I'm sorry for not presuming it was Nathan you were talking about.

btw I knew all along, just "yanking your chain" as the Americans say.

 

[gene hughes]

Re: fuck! Were signing Sinclair

Yea right.

 

[spider-Neil]

Re: fuck! Were signing Sinclair

anyway...

sinclair , is he any good?

 

[Modo]

Re: fuck! Were signing Sinclair

[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=48183.msg1458929#msg1458929 date=1325944978]
anyway...

sinclair , is he any good?
[/quote]

He's OK, but I was expecting better. This is another Downing type signing IMO.

 

[Gerry_A_Trick]

Re: fuck! Were signing Sinclair

It's not a Downing type signing, he's 5 years younger and scores way more goals, and will hopefully be a lot cheaper. I'm not saying he's the answer, but its way more attractive a signing than Downing was.

 

[Oncy]

Re: fuck! Were signing Sinclair

[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=48183.msg1458929#msg1458929 date=1325944978]
anyway...

sinclair , is he any good?
[/quote]He currently cant get a game at Swansea.
Hes not very fast.
Cant beat a man.
Not a great crosser.
Known for being good at set pieces.
He'll fit right in.

 

[Fabio]

Re: fuck! Were signing Sinclair

Thought he was quite quick and a decent finisher?

 

[themn]

Re: fuck! Were signing Sinclair

[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=48183.msg1458917#msg1458917 date=1325944326]
well 6CM seems to be on edge today...
[/quote]

It's a race war tinder box just waiting to ignite.

 

[Gerry_A_Trick]

Re: fuck! Were signing Sinclair

He's started every game for Swansea in the league bar two, and completed 90 minutes in every game bar three(including the two he didn't start)

 

[Halmeister]

Re: fuck! Were signing Sinclair

In fairness he's really quick. Hasn't got much else going for him mind.

 

[Oncy]

Re: fuck! Were signing Sinclair

[quote author=Fascistio link=topic=48183.msg1458941#msg1458941 date=1325946170]
Thought he was quite quick and a decent finisher?
[/quote]Hes fucking muck.
We're filling our team with uninspiring dross.

WHERES MY SOLDADO/HIGAUIN/DIROSSI/DIARRA SIGNINGS!!!

Fucking Sinclair!!

 

[Fabio]

Re: Re: fuck! Were signing Sinclair

[quote author=Herr Onceared link=topic=48183.msg1#msg1 date=1325946386]
[quote author=Fascistio link=topic=48183.msg1458941#msg1458941 date=1325946170]
Thought he was quite quick and a decent finisher?
[/quote]Hes fucking muck.
We're filling our team with uninspiring dross.

WHERES MY SOLDADO/HIGAUIN/DIROSSI/DIARRA SIGNINGS!!!

Fucking Sinclair!!
[/quote] lol

 

[Athens]

Re: fuck! Were signing Sinclair

[quote author=themn link=topic=48183.msg1458942#msg1458942 date=1325946184]
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=48183.msg1458917#msg1458917 date=1325944326]
well 6CM seems to be on edge today...
[/quote]

It's a race war tinder box just waiting to ignite.
[/quote]
In Bruges, racist midget

 

[Hansern]

Re: fuck! Were signing Sinclair

Hoilett has 6 months left on his contract and Blackburn has said he's available for 7-8 mill.

Why on earth does even Sinclair get a mention when Hoilett is up for grabs.
If we sign Sinclair Comolli can get to fuck.

 

[themn]

Re: fuck! Were signing Sinclair

[quote author=athensruairi link=topic=48183.msg1458947#msg1458947 date=1325946580]
[quote author=themn link=topic=48183.msg1458942#msg1458942 date=1325946184]
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=48183.msg1458917#msg1458917 date=1325944326]
well 6CM seems to be on edge today...
[/quote]

It's a race war tinder box just waiting to ignite.
[/quote]
In Bruges, racist midget
[/quote]

Hahaha, I'd forgotten how good that film is.

Must watch it again.

 

[dmishra]

Re: fuck! Were signing Sinclair

[quote author=Herr Onceared link=topic=48183.msg1458940#msg1458940 date=1325946100]
[quote author=spider-neil link=topic=48183.msg1458929#msg1458929 date=1325944978]
anyway...

sinclair , is he any good?
[/quote]He currently cant get a game at Swansea.
Hes not very fast.
Cant beat a man.
Not a great crosser.
Known for being good at set pieces.
He'll fit right in.
[/quote]

Ok, is this the same Scott Sinclair we're talking about? The one who's started 18 of Swansea's 20 PL games this season, and scored 5 goals? Granted I've not seen him play more than 2-3 times (when he's looked very pacy and dangerous), but I'm not sure of any of the above is accurate. I might be missing something as I've admittedly not seen him play week in and week out.

But he was Swansea's player of the season, and scored 27 goals for them last year (know it's the championship, but that's bloody impressive for a winger).

As for not being quick, or being able to beat a man, I really don't know. He's looked pretty quick and dangerous the few times I've seen him play. Youtube reveals this:

Scott Sinclair wonder goal for Plymouth vs Barnet

Scott Sinclair against Crystal Palace

Scott Sinclair Goal v Nottingham Forest

Swansea City FC - Scott Sinclair Goals (2010/2011 Season)

Maybe someone who's seen him play more often can give us the lowdown.