Re: Re: two footed challenges
[quote author=Modo link=topic=48212.msg1463809#msg1463809 date=1326478665]
[quote author=Judge Jules link=topic=48212.msg1463629#msg1463629 date=1326463494]
[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=48212.msg1463503#msg1463503 date=1326451847]
[quote author=Modo link=topic=48212.msg1463500#msg1463500 date=1326451731]
[quote author=mark1975 link=topic=48212.msg1#msg1 date=1326448990]
Does it? Lescott is at an angle to Johnson and Johnson isn't even looking at him. Also, for all of Mancini's kicking off, he didn't seem to give a shit when it shows him throwing the ball back to get on with the game. None of the City players protest, the commentators didn't think much of it either, the only people who make any fuss are the City fans, which is a natural reaction anyway to every tackle against their team.
People are making far too much of this.
[/quote]
Erm...theres a city player who's in the refs face directly after the incident.
[/quote]
It's hardly leaves a unanimous impression.
[/quote]
Zackly. One chancer trying his luck, the rest not even bothering to do that much. Whoop-de-do.
[/quote]
But it kinda makes this ^ statement false.
[/quote]
Seriously, what does that even mean?
BTW John Barnes was just on the radio here and said loud and clear that he'd have had no problem with a tackle like Magic's in his playing days. The radio presenters (one of them an ex-player, Ray Parlour) had both been saying they thought both Kompany and Magic should have gone because both tackles "might" have been serious, to which Digger's answer was "Well, isn't the idea of the game that you have to try and avoid tackles anyway?". Neither of the others could answer that.