Are you therefore saying 'anybody but Rodgers?'Yes but only if we have a replacement lined up already.
No, the right replacement. How about that?Are you therefore saying 'anybody but Rodgers?'
Fair enough. Sorry I wasn't trying to be a clever arse I was just trying to understand where you are on this compared to me. I wouldn't be sorry to see him go but the reason I'm not calling for it is because I don't see any realistic successors out there in whom I'd have any more confidence than I have in Rodgers.No, the right replacement. How about that?
Gonna be fun on here when we appoint Eddie Howe.
I'm pretty much the same. The job is beyond Rodgers. He's had a good go and nearly did it by coming second (I don't believe it was all Suarez since Rodgers clearly managed to get the best out of Henderson, Sterling, Sturridge, Skrtel etc) but his third season was where he should have pushed on and failed pretty badly.Fair enough. Sorry I wasn't trying to be a clever arse I was just trying to understand where you are on this compared to me. I wouldn't be sorry to see him go but the reason I'm not calling for it is because I don't see any realistic successors out there in whom I'd have any more confidence than I have in Rodgers.
If the decent alternatives are interested then yes, but it all hinges on that.