Spurs are great when they're in all out attack mode. Very similar in many ways to Utd but they don't have Utd's composure in defence or the ability to 'manage' games when they can't get their attacks going quite as well. I put this down to the very obvious disparity in quality when it comes to the teams respective managers ability to handle bribes and bungs.
I would give it to Hoddle, never sacked for footy reasons and his team in 98 and 99 played superbly
who is that in your avatar? 😱
I think he has been out of reality for too long*.Surely Glenn Hoddle has been out of football for too long
So giving it to the best manager weve had in two decades is a bad idea but giving it to a man whos won one fa cup in a 30 year career is the way forward.Hoddle hasnt managed since 2006 and his two seasons with Wolves resulted in nearly 50 % draws in the Championship (74 games).
Thats not good at all. And giving him the job after a successfull spell 13-14 years ago is not the way forward.
It should be Harry. He's the best man for the job and the best English coach available. Regardless of how their season is turning out now, he's done very well with Spurs and is the media darling.
If they give it to Hodgson or Pearce, the football will be so poor to watch that people will poke their eyes out during the Euros.
And they'll last a very short time.