West Ham feels like the easier job when you compare the current squads. It’s tempting to get distracted by the buzz of a new stadium or new ownership, but the main focus has to be the existing team. West Ham’s squad is underperforming, whereas Everton’s is just limited and predictable.
Currently West Ham are not working hard enough across the pitch, don’t look fit enough and need some defensive structure, which aligns with what Potter gave to Brighton. Get that in place and be can trust the likes of Bowen and Kudus to deliver at the other end.
I’m not sure West Ham fans would fully take to the style of football Potter played at Brighton. While he earned a lot of acclaim, his team became overly defensive and toothless toward the end of his time there, but as said, he has existing players to mitigate that.
Potters game is less suited to fixing Everton. Their attacking game is shite and limited, and while Dyche’s style is clearly a factor, it’s hard to see Potter as the man to improve that. Besides, Everton fans tend to lose patience with managers quickly anyway.
Potter may have reflected and changed his style whilst living like a king on his Chelsea payout, but from what we know of him, I'd say West Ham his probably the better fit, even if he has to promote David Sullivans dildo empire on the side
