The problem with us is, you never know where the goals are coming from. When we are bang on form, great, but when we are not, as it is now, we look as blunt as Sunderland minus Defoe.
Look at the past winning sides, you always know where the goals are coming from.
Blackburn - S & S
Manc before - Always the great crosses with Beckham Neville Giggs et el and the set pieces
Arsenal before - Henry + supporting casts like Overmars etc.
Last season Leicester - Vardy, Mahrez
This season Chelsea - Costa, Hazard
Besides consistent main scorers, the teams all have better defences than us.
To bring my point across, we almost won the league when the 3S were plummeting goals.
Unfortunately before we find some consistent and reliable scorers, or alternatively a better defence + some Leicester luck, we are never going to win the league.
I don't think anybody would deny that until we get a top quality defensive unit that is reliable and miserly, we won't win titles
The issue with 'reliable' goalscorers is less clear, although it is a point that has been discussed at length. While there is no certainty that a player who can deliver 20 goals or so - maybe even two! - there is unarguable evidence to suggest that you are far, *far* more likely to win the league if you have one than not.
Of course it's easy enough to point out teams that had (or have) one and still didn't win the title (not least Liverpool on several occasions), but that's a fallacious argument. If you have one, you're statistically more likely to win the title
But I think I'd possibly want to fix the shocking defence first