I know - on social media channels they were saying that he said that Q had lost too many duels when in fact he said "We were losing too many duels". The some started saying it was Q who was losing the duels as the reason for the substitution. Fucking joke.If people actually bothered to watch and listen in to what he had to say after Ipswich then there wouldn't have been any confusion over the transcript, was very clear the first time, fucking mongs that can't do a basic job.
Moron vs Slot & Co. (training, Seville, Ipswich).First of all I saw most of that game, I thought the best midfielder was Lavia despite being on the losing side.
Now regarding your point of Grav, - I think one good game against newly promoted Ipswich is not good enough to trust him for the whole season in that position. it is not going to work and it won't.
It was against Ipswich, try and get that into your head, and in any case if he is the only suitable player in that position right now, its no good coz at some point he is gonna need resting or get injured.Moron vs Slot & Co. (training, Seville, Ipswich).
Poor Endo.It was against Ipswich, try and get that into your head, and in any case if he is the only suitable player in that position right now, its no good coz at some point he is gonna need resting or get injured.
Is he saying the only reason Gravy was good because others were good?
Yea but you can have a load of shit out there and pick out the one player who actually tried and did things. I thought that was the case with Gravy in the first half last week.
Sorry but I don’t understand this 'being treated shoddily' or 'didn't deserve this'. What does that actually mean? That he should be played ahead of Gravenberch?I thought there were a few occasions where he dithered on the ball, and almost tried to be too safe rather than trust himself to make the incisive pass. I think Endo is being treated a little shoddily in all this- he really deserves more minutes, and I think he's still the player I would like anchoring the midfield against more dangerous opponents. Still, I'm really pleased to see Gravy making some strides.
Then it should be Elliott for Macca not Endo.If truth be told, I'd probably rest Macca, or keep him on the bench as a weapon for a few games, and play Endo and Gravy. Macca looks like a guy who has played 24 months solid. He hasn't been himself at all.
I'm sorry Froggy that somebody has the temerity to disagree with you, but when it comes to the tough games this season, Endo is a more natural 6, and I happen to think he has a few years left at the top level. With Utd coming next week I'd like Endo to have been given more minutes.Sorry but I don’t understand this 'being treated shoddily' or 'didn't deserve this'. What does that actually mean? That he should be played ahead of Gravenberch?
It's Slot's job to develop this team to it's maximum and we all know that isn't Endo. So whilst it's great to keep him on the books as back up or to come on to save 1st teamers energy, he's not being treated badly, and I'd rather Gravenberch get all the available 1st team minutes to develop, failing us buying an established and better #6.
Then it should be Elliott for Macca not Endo.
I feel like you posted this knowing you would get a like...I gave it anyway.Endo was brilliant in the big games last season, I'd like to see him and Grav in a pivot against Utd while Mac gets the rest he desperately looks like he could do with.