• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Big D vs Twitter

I suspect it's an easy way for him to get funding from his Russian mates. If he was into that type of thing.

Oh, it’s just another one of his grifts to try and keep paying his lawyers to keep him out of the Big House.
 
318884110_574365151122921_6853260991096765574_n.jpg


Caption competition, anyone?
 
So the elephant said to the doctor, "I dunno where it came from, it started off as a spot on my arse."
 
I can’t believe too many real people bought those. Most geriatric Trump fans have no idea what NFT is and the younger conservatives seem mostly embarrassed by this naked grift. I second @Athens hypothesis that this is just a money laundering vehicle.
 
Apparently they have increased markedly in price. Never underestimate the stupidity of Trump supporters.
 
I think many of them couldnt give a monkey's about politics. Probably crypto and NFT flippers (dont be surprised if they're your kids age too) or even bored apes who saw an opportunity to make quick gains. Something like that sort of publicity and name will surely fetch mad prices very quickly.
 
Apparently they have increased markedly in price. Never underestimate the stupidity of Trump supporters.

Could also be speculators who bought them up - much like the guys who mass-buy tickets to popular concerts and sporting events, hoping to make a profit. Will they actually make a profit this time or be left holding the bag remains to be seen.
 


No one takes him seriously, but I think this guy (Mike Lindell, the pillow salesman) has the right combination of shameless, sleaziness and pure unhinged idiocy to eventually co-opt the Trump brand or at least steal a large chunk of his fanbase. The fact that he seems completely incompetent and bad at this is NOT a weakness; the more obvious the swindle, the better.
 
This thread has a facinating arc to it.

It was started 2.5 years ago by a poster (no longer here) who was outraged by Twitter fact-checking Trump. (it was actually Twitter pointing out he had voilated the rule about glorifying violence with his 'when the looting starts, the shooting starts' tweet).

I doubt anyone could have forseen that not long after Trump would fail to get re-elected, be booted off Twitter for starting an insurection, Twitter getting bought for $44b by one of his billionaire buddies, Twitter gets driven to the point of bankruptcy, Trump is reinstated to Twitter, announces he's running for President again, just as he looks to be on the brink of being jailed.

If anyone had written that as a script it would've been rejected as beyond anything believable
 
What you should actually be talking about is how government money was used to pay Twitter to censor topics that didn't suit the democratic party.

You dopes probably still think the Hunter Biden laptop doesn't exist.
 
Can we merge this thread with Elon’s break down thread. Seems like everything is related and just as like the phrase begining is the end
There’s a pattern here somewhere about big corp leaders who rather than focus on their big corp day job, start spending too much time trying to publicise twitter rumours…
 
Can we merge this thread with Elon’s break down thread. Seems like everything is related and just as like the phrase begining is the end
There’s a pattern here somewhere about big corp leaders who rather than focus on their big corp day job, start spending too much time trying to publicise twitter rumours…

I agree. It seems like Musk has bought SCM as well, and ordered that the mods should release the kraken.
 
I think outing Tucker Carlos as a giant hypocrite doesn’t make one iota of a difference to anyone - even his fans know he’s a piece of human excrement with a bow tie who is lying to them for profit but they don’t mind as long as he keeps providing them their daily dose of anger and outrage. He is essentially their drug dealer - and junkies don’t tend to be overly picky.

The only thing that would make a difference is whether these revelations will put Fox in enough legal jeopardy that they’ll be forced to change their business model from peddling lies to doing something resembling actual news. The facts uncovered by the Dominion lawsuit are damning enough that even US’s very strong First Amendment protections might not save Rupert from going down in flames.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom