• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Benitez to be Newcastle Manager..

Status
Not open for further replies.
All this topic is doing is making me remember horribly shit players like Damien Plessis and now I'm in a bad mood. Thanks for nothing guys.
 
Yeah, and you can argue about Hula Hoops and Rafadyce all day long, they both spent loads, neither of them won the league, they can both fuck off.
 
I also remember getting knocked out of the Champions League with 7 points from a group containing Lyon,Fiorentina and Debrecen.

Lol, You mean after wining it once, making the finals and semi finals the rest of the time?
 
A fair bit of rewriting of history going on there IMHO. Didi for one reckons he met one authentic genius in his time at LFC, and it wasn't GH. There's no way GH was/is the brighter of the two - less manipulative overall maybe, but there was more than a touch of manipulation about the events leading up to Robbie's departure for example, and I suspect Jari Litmanen for one would also have something to say about his man-management. He did sign the majority of the Istanbul squad (bar a couple of Spanish guys without whom we wouldn't even have got to the Final, let alone won it) but it took Rafa to turn them into champions of Europe.
There is no re-writing history whatsoever , I don't know why you would make such an accusation , it's my opinion, and one that I stand by. You give me Litmanen a player that failed to live up to the billing spectacularly, and by all accounts was a big piss-head, not the ideal example. Rafas path is littered with people that he has fucked over , I will give you in return Xabi Alonso, GED managed to con Leeds out of 9m pounds for Robbie Fowler, a player he had dragged back from the edge of an abyss. I would say that was clever rather than manipulative, Didi is entitled to his opinion as am I, oh and you.

Regards
 
Vlad, we made the CL year after year and were a force to be reckoned with. Under Houllier, we definitely improved and went a level higher culminating in 2001. But we weren't a regular qualifier for the CL, or half as feared in Europe as we were under Rafa. We were clearly back in the European elite. I'm not sure how you can argue against this - maybe domestically, they were closer to a par? Is that what you mean?
 
Vlad, we made the CL year after year and were a force to be reckoned with. Under Houllier, we definitely improved and went a level higher culminating in 2001. But we weren't a regular qualifier for the CL, or half as feared in Europe as we were under Rafa. We were clearly back in the European elite. I'm not sure how you can argue against this - maybe domestically, they were closer to a par? Is that what you mean?

Well the things is certain people seriously dislike Rafa, even hate him, so it's not really a rational debate. I suppose what annoys me most is why that same treatment never seems to get meted out to other, inferior, ex-managers as well. I think the answer is probably that people really resent that some fans love him, and so they take it out on him.
 
Well the things is certain people seriously dislike Rafa, even hate him, so it's not really a rational debate. I suppose what annoys me most is why that same treatment never seems to get meted out to other, inferior, ex-managers as well. I think the answer is probably that people really resent that some fans love him, and so they take it out on him.

Yeah but Vlad is one of those that has a more balanced view of Rafa, usually, which is why I was trying to understand.

As for the man management games, Houllier was pretty ruthless as well. Time helps us forget those things I guess. The improvement under Rafa has that if a player was a bad purchase, he was gone quickly. Ged would try to make it work, somehow.
 
There is no re-writing history whatsoever , I don't know why you would make such an accusation , it's my opinion, and one that I stand by. You give me Litmanen a player that failed to live up to the billing spectacularly, and by all accounts was a big piss-head, not the ideal example. Rafas path is littered with people that he has fucked over , I will give you in return Xabi Alonso, GED managed to con Leeds out of 9m pounds for Robbie Fowler, a player he had dragged back from the edge of an abyss. I would say that was clever rather than manipulative, Didi is entitled to his opinion as am I, oh and you.

Regards

I didn't mean to suggest you were deliberately falsifying anything, Vlad, but I don't think your opinion has a sound basis. You declare without any evidence to back it up that GH was "clearly the brighter of the two" (and BTW "clearly" comes across as presenting hard fact, not opinion). You say Litmanen "failed to live up to the billing" but I never, ever saw any evidence for that either. What I remember is a player who improved us every single time he played, who went on to play Champions League football successfully for Ajax after leaving LFC and whose departure has never been properly explained. If GH thought Robbie had outlasted his usefulness he could simply have sold him, instead of making public statements undermining him and getting Thommo to ride him especially hard in training (e.g.that incident where Thommo did so to such an extent that Robbie fired a shot straight at him and was torn off a strip for it). I'm not saying Rafa wasn't a manipulator, because he was and is, but the idea that GH didn't do the same doesn't stand up IMHO.
 
You kids are going too deep.

They were both better than competent but not brilliant. They were both almost good enough but not quite. That's why we got divorced, twice. They sucked the shaft, sometimes they even looked us right in the eye as they licked our glans - and they let us come all over their tits. But ultimately didn't lick the balls enough or shove enough fingers up the arse. They didn't get a six inch three speed vibrating dildo and ream us to number 19.

They both failed us.
 
Yeah but Vlad is one of those that has a more balanced view of Rafa, usually, which is why I was trying to understand.

As for the man management games, Houllier was pretty ruthless as well. Time helps us forget those things I guess. The improvement under Rafa has that if a player was a bad purchase, he was gone quickly. Ged would try to make it work, somehow.

Not IMO. I think he's one of the least balanced.
 
You kids are going too deep.

They were both better than competent but not brilliant. They were both almost good enough but not quite. That's why we got divorced, twice. They sucked the shaft, sometimes they even looked us right in the eye as they licked our glans - and they let us come all over their tits. But ultimately didn't lick the balls enough or shove enough fingers up the arse. They didn't get a six inch three speed vibrating dildo and ream us to number 19.

They both failed us.
We might not have got no.19 but we got no.5. It's a pretty big deal.
 
You're letting your low view of Rafa cloud that one. Houllier got to the CL and always underperformed - creamed in the CL by the lower clubs. Remember v Leverkusen when he subbed in Smicer for Hammann and we collapsed and got knocked out. On that comparison alone, it should be clear, what the difference in level was.

Really? I seem to remember Benitez "forgetting" to put a defensive midfielder on the then best player in Europe in Istanbul, even at 3-0 down he was forced into putting Hamann on because of Finnan's injury and Gerrard dropping to right wing back. So if we're talking about naive decisions bordering on egotistical blind spots, that's one right there.

Difference in level? In the league they were more or less at the same level, in the domestic cups they were as indifferent as each other and in Europe they both won important trophies in games that could really have gone either way.

People are rewriting history all over the place in this thread.
 
Never has a football analogy involving anal fingers, blowing and shaft work hit the spot more. Thank you @Woland I will never be able to receive oral action without seeing Rafa's goatee or Ged's bulging eyes. Prolly still blow my load though.
 
Really? I seem to remember Benitez "forgetting" to put a defensive midfielder on the then best player in Europe in Istanbul, even at 3-0 down he was forced into putting Hamann on because of Finnan's injury and Gerrard dropping to right wing back. So if we're talking about naive decisions bordering on egotistical blind spots, that's one right there.

Difference in level? In the league they were more or less at the same level, in the domestic cups they were as indifferent as each other and in Europe they both won important trophies in games that could really have gone either way.

People are rewriting history all over the place in this thread.

I think that's bollocks, isn't it? Where are you getting that from?
 
Hamann was coming on anyway. Djimi was supposed to come off but Finnan did instead as he was injured. Gerrard went to right back once we were level at 3-3.
 
I think that's bollocks, isn't it? Where are you getting that from?

No one will ever know what truly happened - it's either one side (he put Hamman on to neutralize Kaka) or the other (he was forced into the move by Finnan's injury as he wanted to bring off Djimi, who made that goal line clearance)
 
No one will ever know what truly happened - it's either one side (he put Hamman on to neutralize Kaka) or the other (he was forced into the move by Finnan's injury as he wanted to bring off Djimi, who made that goal line clearance)

I don't think it's even a matter of doubt. He wanted to go to a back three including Finnan, with Hamann sitting, but instead had to keep Traore on instead of Finnan. I've never seen anyone bu you and Makr suggest otherwise.
 
What about Houllier, not being able to hold a 3-1 lead in the UEFA cup final or being outplayed in FA cup final or being extremely lucky in the league cup final, considering that Birmingham should had a penalty in extra time.
 
I don't think it's even a matter of doubt. He wanted to go to a back three including Finnan, with Hamann sitting, but instead had to keep Traore on instead of Finnan. I've never seen anyone bu you and Makr suggest otherwise.

First of all, I don't bring it up (but many people have talked about it). In fact, it's discussed in this book in the last chapter (and I've basically paraphrased it):

http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2010/aug/14/red-men-liverpool-football-club-john-williams

I thought you were far better on this subject when you assessed Rafa's fuck ups ... but it seems if ANYONE brings up anything that you feel insults your God, you get all hissy pissy.
 
No one will ever know what truly happened - it's either one side (he put Hamman on to neutralize Kaka) or the other (he was forced into the move by Finnan's injury as he wanted to bring off Djimi, who made that goal line clearance)

The logic is astounding here. How can Benitez possibly be forced to bring a DM in order to replace a RB?
Especially with Josemi on the bench?
 
What about Houllier, not being able to hold a 3-1 lead in the UEFA cup final or being outplayed in FA cup final or being extremely lucky in the league cup final, considering that Birmingham should had a penalty in extra time.

Yes yes, we get it Ross Modo
 
The logic is astounding here. How can Benitez possibly be forced to bring a DM in order to replace a RB?
Especially with Josemi on the bench?

Read the book I linked above and send him a postcard. You guys are like two teenagers arguing if Thatcher's dick is really bigger than Major's.
 
BTW it's not about people criticising Rafa for me, it's about some of you comparing Rafa's achievements with Houllier's and saying that they're equal that bothers me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom