We dont have a single player we could sell for over 20 mill.
We dont have a single player we could sell for over 20 mill.
What do you think would happen if they just told the whole team to get their agents on the ball finding them a new club this summer. If you don't find one you won't even make the bench next season. Just a total redo.Answer!! Sell the lot for £20mill
This..Performances like today and Watford saw Rogers and Dalglish crucified on here. It was abject, gutless rubbish.
At least we know now that the chancers who pulled their fingers our temporarily have been sussed out. We need to spend big and cut our losses on a few players, most at this rate.
Performances like today and Watford saw Rogers and Dalglish crucified on here. It was abject, gutless rubbish.
At least we know now that the chancers who pulled their fingers out temporarily have been sussed out. We need to spend big and cut our losses on a few players, most at this rate.
This..
No one should pass judgment on Klopp till at lead he has the chance to bring in his own players.
Id keep..
Sakho, Clyne, Can, Henderson, Ings, Coutinho and some youngsters and that's about it..
I didn't mention Studge, as we would be lumbered with him regardless
Its not even the worst, it's just poorly assembled in terms of cohesion. I get that Klopp has his favoured style, like anyone, but a manager has to adjust to what he's given. Rodgers got stick for trying to shoehorn Mario into a fluid attack. Now Klopp is doing the same to Benteke, but the player is getting the stick.
If the manager is going to stick with a favoured setup, then use the squad, use the right cogs instead of hoping a group of pricey players become the sum of their parts. If Benteke doesn't fit and you're not going to be flexible over a philosophy, then ditch the player and move on, there's no point wasting talented players to keep others temporarily happy. It serves no purpose, other than delaying progress.
No i have to disagree.
Klopp by any objective measure is ten times the manager Rodgers is.
If he's not able to get any more out of the same players then either Klopp has to be criticised or those who think managers have magical powers have to cop the fuck on
Well hang on a minute, Origi, Sturridge, and Ings are all out injured. He's got nobody else to start. Previous to this he has been playing Origi who he sees as a better fit for his style of play.
Its not even the worst, it's just poorly assembled in terms of cohesion. I get that Klopp has his favoured style, like anyone, but a manager has to adjust to what he's given. Rodgers got stick for trying to shoehorn Mario into a fluid attack. Now Klopp is doing the same to Benteke, but the player is getting the stick.
If the manager is going to stick with a favoured setup, then use the squad, use the right cogs instead of hoping a group of pricey players become the sum of their parts. If Benteke doesn't fit and you're not going to be flexible over a philosophy, then ditch the player and move on, there's no point wasting talented players to keep others temporarily happy. It serves no purpose, other than delaying progress.
I'm not convinced with Klopp. Not from day one.
All that pomp and pizazz at the pressers ain't gonna fool me. He only knows how to play one way of football throughout his entire career and he's proving it again here that he's quite out of his depth. You can blame the squad but come on its not that bad as some of you make it.
I think the soft German has lots to answer for.
Hang on, Mark. Rodgers is the one who bought all these players who are a mismatch and the reason he got sacked was even he couldn't get a tune out of them. As far as I can see from Klopp, Benteke is 4th choice striker, transfer fee be damned, and we're down to our 4th choice. You select him and hope for a the flukey goal such as against Leicester and Sunderland. What you can't control for, and for which the player is getting some stick, is the sheer inability to convert one-on-one situations.Its not even the worst, it's just poorly assembled in terms of cohesion. I get that Klopp has his favoured style, like anyone, but a manager has to adjust to what he's given. Rodgers got stick for trying to shoehorn Mario into a fluid attack. Now Klopp is doing the same to Benteke, but the player is getting the stick.
If the manager is going to stick with a favoured setup, then use the squad, use the right cogs instead of hoping a group of pricey players become the sum of their parts. If Benteke doesn't fit and you're not going to be flexible over a philosophy, then ditch the player and move on, there's no point wasting talented players to keep others temporarily happy. It serves no purpose, other than delaying progress.
I reckon Spurs would tomorrow.I reckon someone would still pay 20M+ for Benteke.
The rest... hard to say.
Hang on, Mark. Rodgers is the one who bought all these players who are a mismatch and the reason he got sacked was even he couldn't get a tune out of them. As far as I can see from Klopp, Benteke is 4th choice striker, transfer fee be damned, and we're down to our 4th choice. You select him and hope for a the flukey goal such as against Leicester and Sunderland. What you can't control for, and for which the player is getting some stick, is the sheer inability to convert one-on-one situations.
So why was it necessary to even play him then, if this the case? Everyone keeps banging on about how Klopp has played Firmino in the false 9 ahead of him, the option was there to do that again today. Not that I'm particularly rating Firmino any more highly, but at least he fits the system better.
I'm not convinced with Klopp. Not from day one.
All that pomp and pizazz at the pressers ain't gonna fool me. He only knows how to play one way of football throughout his entire career and he's proving it again here that he's quite out of his depth. You can blame the squad but come on its not that bad as some of you make it.
I think the soft German has lots to answer for.