• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Today's match

Status
Not open for further replies.

LeTallecWiz

Doos
Moderator
I saw nada - and don't have the patience to go through the match thread ...

- Sturridge?
- Was the pitch playable?
- How did Shelvey do?
- How did Wisdom do?
- How did Robinson do?

Anything else?
 
I saw nada - and don't have the patience to go through the match thread ...

- Sturridge?
- Was the pitch playable?
- How did Shelvey do?
- How did Wisdom do?
- How did Robinson do?

Anything else?
Great
Awful
Great
Good
Good
 
Sturridge made some great runs, scored a good goal but pissed about with two other clear chances that could have cost us. First game though so it was encouraging.

Pitch was fine - we managed to pass it around well enough for the first half hour anyway.

Shelvey was good, won the ball back a few times and set up 4 or 5 clear chances which we fluffed. He missed a couple himself though too late on.

Wisdom looked really composed, took a knock though so was taken off for Flanno.

Robbo did ok, not as good as Wisdom but not bad, was guilty of giving the ball away alot though.
 
Thanks ... Scoreline misleading? I've seen the goals now -

People happy with the performance? Or we pissed around instead of getting a 7-1 scoreline?
 
Thanks ... Scoreline misleading? I've seen the goals now -

People happy with the performance? Or we pissed around instead of getting a 7-1 scoreline?

We pissed around and spurned chances again and it could have cost us again. The midfield is piss poor, Lucas and Allen, meh.
 
The linesman who gave Suarez the goal was the same who flagged for offside against Everton in injury time.....
 
Sturridge started out really well. Took his goal really well. Was too hesitant on another occasion and really should've scored. Made some great runs. One of our best players today.

Pitch was fucking dire. Our passing was awful at times, and I'm fairly sure the pitch played a huge part in it.

Shelvey was ok. Created some chances (including Sturridge's goal). But he was also guilty of missing a couple of good chances and gave the ball away on more than one occasion with misplaced passes.

Wisdom was decent. He seems to be growing with confidence. Still no GlenJo though.

Robinson tried hard but he looked completely lost a lot of the time. I would have expected more from him against a non-league side.
 
We pissed around and spurned chances again and it could have cost us again. The midfield is piss poor, Lucas and Allen, meh.
I know he's coming back from injury and all but I've not been impressed with Lucas for a while now.

I didn't watch the game today thoroughly but playing away at some farmers field against a team that'll give their first borns away to get a result is never going to be easy.

Having said that I'd not be surprised if Rodgers were to ponder on our DM options in the near future.

We so lack grit and steel in the engineroom at times, as especially the Stoke game revealed. The fact none of our midfielders ever seem to score is another issue we can't overlook. Third, and equally important, none of our midfielders possess any real height nor power in the air. Combined with the lack in the same department when it comes to our CBs we really would thrive from a strong, tall ball-playing DM.

They are not cheap if any good and a rare breed perhaps, but we should do our utmost to look into this type of player.

I've only heard great things about Wanyama from Celtic, and he's one strong lad too. Could be a taylor made solution. I'd certainly make a straight swap with Lucas given the choice.
 
I was under the impression that near enough everyone in world football thought Di canio was a cunt?
 
I was under the impression that near enough everyone in world football thought Di canio was a cunt?

You're right, most fair minded people agree that he is a twat of the highest order. However, the journos in London love him so apparently he isn't a cunt.
But we know he is. So in summary, Di Canio is cunting twat face.
 
This sounds like a reasoned reaction


Martin Lipton@MartinLipton
Obvious that Suarez goal should not have stood. But can't get too exercised about it. All players try it on. Not something he planned
 
I just read Rodgers' comments on it, and the 4th official said it wasn't intentional so that's why it stood.

If I was a betting man, I'd say it's intentional ... It wasn't close enough to his body to be 'reflex'.
 
Matt Holland:

It was clear handball. But the rules of football dictate that there is one person authorised to stop the game and award a free kick. And that person is not Luis Suarez.

I think he knew he’d done it, the way he smashed the ball into the net and then looked straight at the linesman. I also don’t think he did it on purpose, not like Maradona or Thierry Henry.

Cheating is one thing: I can’t stand diving and I’ve called on many occasions for retrospective punishments for those who try to dupe a referee. Trying to get the rub of the green is another and as a player you are always told to play to the whistle which is exactly what Suarez did.

I know that probably in every game I played I asked the referee to give a decision in my favour when consciously or unconsciously I knew I’d had the last touch before the ball rolled off the field.

You can’t blame players for that. What would I do in a situation like today’s? I don’t know, you never know until you are there but I do know that it’s irrelevant whether it’s an FA Cup third round or a World Cup final if you’re a professional player.

So do we have to allow players like Suarez to get away with it? Absolutely not, but the answer is not giving individuals morality lessons but giving officials the tools to tackle the problem.

Video technology, like that used in rugby, could have cleared up the ‘goal’ in no more than a minute.

That’s what we should be clamouring for, not some kind of modern day village stocks to vilify professionals who are put under intense pressure to deliver every Saturday.

PS Another question that needs tackling is a clarification of the handball law. The idea of intent is impossible for referees to judge. Maybe it’s time to say if the ball hits the arm or hand it’s a foul, at least you could be consistent that way.
 
Lucas was shit
Suarez handball wasn't intentional.
Robinson and Wisdom were ok. Sturridge will be a hit (as predicted before).
Coates might aswell leave.
Shelvey...a bit hit and miss (as usual).
We were shit.
 
Matt Holland:

It was clear handball. But the rules of football dictate that there is one person authorised to stop the game and award a free kick. And that person is not Luis Suarez.

I think he knew he’d done it, the way he smashed the ball into the net and then looked straight at the linesman. I also don’t think he did it on purpose, not like Maradona or Thierry Henry.

Cheating is one thing: I can’t stand diving and I’ve called on many occasions for retrospective punishments for those who try to dupe a referee. Trying to get the rub of the green is another and as a player you are always told to play to the whistle which is exactly what Suarez did.

I know that probably in every game I played I asked the referee to give a decision in my favour when consciously or unconsciously I knew I’d had the last touch before the ball rolled off the field.

You can’t blame players for that. What would I do in a situation like today’s? I don’t know, you never know until you are there but I do know that it’s irrelevant whether it’s an FA Cup third round or a World Cup final if you’re a professional player.

So do we have to allow players like Suarez to get away with it? Absolutely not, but the answer is not giving individuals morality lessons but giving officials the tools to tackle the problem.

Video technology, like that used in rugby, could have cleared up the ‘goal’ in no more than a minute.

That’s what we should be clamouring for, not some kind of modern day village stocks to vilify professionals who are put under intense pressure to deliver every Saturday.

PS Another question that needs tackling is a clarification of the handball law. The idea of intent is impossible for referees to judge. Maybe it’s time to say if the ball hits the arm or hand it’s a foul, at least you could be consistent that way.

Thats just about the most reasoned response to this episode that Ive seen, shame it will be buried under a pile of "Fergie slams cheating Suarez" headlines in the next week
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom