For Mignolet a better goalkeeping coach could/should make a difference, thats something we should really be looking at when you factor in Reina and his form for us for his last 2 seasons.
Achterberg isn't it? get rid.
We play a risky style of football that's side effect is putting defenders into these sort of positions where cockups can happen. I think we'd have to change our style a bit and compromise our attacking play to have a solid defence that doesn't leak goals. I'd rather we leak the odd goal but win most games 3-1 or 4-1. But winning the big games by that margin is the challenge. We'll see how we get on against the arse.
I don't think a defensive coach would do that much. Competition or a replacement for Lucas might help, as would better full backs.
Yes, as they always have a specialist coach it makes sense, and the current one seems an amiable bloke who is out of his depth.
They need to be better coached. It wouldn't affect the rest of our play if defenders took up better positions at corners, stopped inviting refs to award penalties for blatant shirt tugging and stopped that aimless faffing about in front of their own area.
For Mignolet a better goalkeeping coach could/should make a difference, thats something we should really be looking at when you factor in Reina and his form for us for his last 2 seasons.
Achterberg isn't it? get rid.
Skrtel the tit is a penalty waiting to happen doing that, I'm not sure what possesses him to do it.
We play with attacking fullbacks & rarely play with two sitting in front of the CB's, that combined with a lack of a cb partnership is the big issue at hand.
The full backs may well be changed & the CB's may well be consistent, but not til next season, & we'll still be wanting our full backs to push up.
The main issue is positional & most specifically positions on set pieces.
I'd like to think that we can sort that in house, but it hasn't happened yet despite most fans seeing the glaring errors, so perhaps a defensive coach is the answer to that issue?
Skrtel the tit is a penalty waiting to happen doing that, I'm not sure what possesses him to do it.
Reina ha been reunited with that great coach since, and hasn't been any better.
It's being singled out by the cameras every game we play. Refs therefore know a sacrificial lamb has been chosen, and if he chooses to penalise Skrtel he knows all the pundits will applaud him for doing what they said needed to be done 'to discourage the others'.
It's being singled out by the cameras every game we play. Refs therefore know a sacrificial lamb has been chosen, and if he chooses to penalise Skrtel he knows all the pundits will applaud him for doing what they said needed to be done 'to discourage the others'.
Would Clarke be interested in his position, even if just for a short spell?
I trust his ability to sort a defence out.
Is Clarke's defensive coaching prowess overrated though?
We conceded 40 goals in a full season with Kenny/Clarke, and that was pretty much the same backline as the one under Rodgers' first season which conceded 43. A couple of changes later in this season, we're on track to concede 45 goals at the current rate of concession. Hardly a huge difference, especially when you consider we're missing Enrique for a huge chunk this season.
West Brom let in 57 goals last season. Well, we know they have less quality in their players, but 57 goals is still a lot of goals - enough to put them in the bottom 9 in goals conceded. They actually conceded fewer goals (52) in the season before Clarke.
I don't know - it could all just condense to the quality of the guys we have, and their availability plus familiarity with each other. I don't know what the answer is, but I'm not convinced that Clarke is the answer. He might be, but the (limited) stats don't support that right now.
It runs through the club, I'm afraid. The reserves and younger teams are all over the place defending corners.