Moyes is on a 6yr contract aswell, so it'll cost him a fortune to fuck him off.
Bit funny that it's six years, talk about "well it took Fergie six years to get it right, so...."
Moyes is on a 6yr contract aswell, so it'll cost him a fortune to fuck him off.
Quite. I can't see Moyes staying around long enough for it to become truly catastrophic for them, but the rot is setting in and if that only hampers them for a couple of seasons, it's better than nothing and it would seem to be, perfect timing for us. We need a club or two to fall away, every little helps.
The issue at the minute is two-fold. Players who play for the club, clearly don't want to play for him and it's difficult to see how he can attract top players with his profile and a lack of European Football to offer. They're always going to have money, as Keni said, so they will always have the potential there to be a force, and that's the danger for the rest of us. The biggest plus, regardless of whether Moyes stays or goes, is that the monopoly and fear factor has been broken, that's going to take longer to repair regardless of who ends up in charge.
I wouldn't be surprised if they try to go for Maureen in the Summer.
nah fuck that, he might play shit football at times but he wins everywhere he goes
Coming from Charlton, who is a United director and ambassador and was a kingmaker in Ferguson's appointment during 1986, his take on Mourinho is intriguing in a week that began with Ferguson backing the Real Madrid manager's ability to take charge of United, telling ITV4: "He can manage anywhere, absolutely." For Charlton, who embodies the values of the club better than anyone, Mourinho's antics last season do not befit a United manager.
One of the most uncomfortable entries on an ever-lengthening charge sheet was Mourinho's gouging of the eye of Tito Vilanova, then Barcelona's assistant coach, in the 2011 Spanish Super Cup. "A United manager wouldn't do that," Charlton says. "Mourinho is a really good coach but that's as far as I would go really. He's the manager of Real Madrid and we expect to play them in the Champions League by the end of the season."
When it is put to him that it is difficult to imagine a United manager being allowed to get away with some of Mourinho's behaviour, Charlton says: "You are right. He pontificates too much for my liking. He's a good manager, though."
But Ferguson admires Mourinho. "He doesn't like him too much, though," Charlton shoots back.
After the game the Special One was the picture of humility as he admitted that United had outplayed his Madrid side and even claimed "the best side lost". The remark, possibly designed to butter up the United faithful, was picked up on by controversial ITV pundit Roy Keane, who commented "I think he's trying to be humble and it really doesn't suit him."
As much as Moyes has made his own mistakes and has to take responsibility for them, IMO the main element in their meltdown this season has been not who their manager is but who he isn't. Ferguson's a despicable human being but his managerial record - at least partly *because* he's such a total cnut - is extraordinary, so following him was always going to be nigh on impossible and whoever got the job first was almost bound to fail. I think they knew that in the Old Toilet boardroom (not least after their experience when Busby stood down) and appointed someone who they thought would at least be tough enough to take the enormous pressure involved. I doubt they budgeted for such a rapid rate of decline though (or indeed such a visible decline in the manager himself - looking at Moyes these days makes me think of the phrase "dead man walking" in a very literal sense).
Fair comment, but would you be able to put the brakes on if you were out there mugging the Mancs off on their own onion patch? I defo wouldn't.
Enter Mourinho - he could easily do an Inter with them. The only positive is he'd not stick around too long.
I reckon that would just about make them an even more hateful club than ever before.
Sent from my HTC One XL
I heard the manc directors made a very conscious decision to choose a successor in terms of fitting their profile, which stressed the importance of 'competence + character', instead of just going for anyone so long as he was a proven winner. That was partly motivated by an extreme aversion some directors had to Mourinho (unlike Ginsoak himself, who was surprised to find there was so much resistance to the man). So after that decision was made, Bobby Charlton was given the task of making some public comments that basically sent out the message that Mourhino didn't fit the profile. Here's one:
Strangely for such a 'clever' man, it seems that Mourinho didn't 'get' any of this and still went on that charm offensive about the club, thinking they'd hand the job to him.
Ginsoak, meanwhile, was left still looking like the job was his gift to give, whilst secretly feeling like he'd had his real preference blocked.
So that let in Moyes as the safe man who wouldn't upset the directors or the sponsors but would be a safe pair of hands.
Now that hasn't worked, they face trying the same trick again, now knowing that they might end up with another man out of his depth, or tearing up the plan and gambling on getting someone with a monstrous ego who'll bully, cheat and bark his team back to the top.
Someone like Ginsoak, in other words.
To be fair to the Man U board, having endured an odious bullying cunt for the previous twenty six years you can understand why they would be reluctant to hire another oneI heard the manc directors made a very conscious decision to choose a successor in terms of fitting their profile, which stressed the importance of 'competence + character', instead of just going for anyone so long as he was a proven winner. That was partly motivated by an extreme aversion some directors had to Mourinho (unlike Ginsoak himself, who was surprised to find there was so much resistance to the man). So after that decision was made, Bobby Charlton was given the task of making some public comments that basically sent out the message that Mourhino didn't fit the profile. Here's one:
Strangely for such a 'clever' man, it seems that Mourinho didn't 'get' any of this and still went on that charm offensive about the club, thinking they'd hand the job to him.
Ginsoak, meanwhile, was left still looking like the job was his gift to give, whilst secretly feeling like he'd had his real preference blocked.
So that let in Moyes as the safe man who wouldn't upset the directors or the sponsors but would be a safe pair of hands.
Now that hasn't worked, they face trying the same trick again, now knowing that they might end up with another man out of his depth, or tearing up the plan and gambling on getting someone with a monstrous ego who'll bully, cheat and bark his team back to the top.
Someone like Ginsoak, in other words.