Nonsense. And you disagreeing is proof that I'm right.
Pre Match Thread - Chelsea (a) - Sun 13th 16:30
- Thread starter Brizzle
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
Nonsense. And you disagreeing is proof that I'm right.
I thought that too!
I thought Harvey was superb when he came on and won more duals that most and was very direct and positive.
Doak was a waste of a sub.
Nunez was ok.
Robbo much improved after Curtis came on.
Konate easily motd.
Allison second.
Alexis third in a fill in position.
The signs are there for a great team.
Doak was a waste of a sub.
Nunez was ok.
Robbo much improved after Curtis came on.
Konate easily motd.
Allison second.
Alexis third in a fill in position.
The signs are there for a great team.
And the ref, var and commentary are proof your opinion is off the mark but would rather insult than concede that that’s why it was called that way.
His elbows were tucked in a natural position.
Would have been super harsh.
He was fucking awful on the ball today.
The commentary that expected it to be given, you mean..? The ref who was brutal all day long? And VAR..?!?!? Yea, right, horse.
I thought it was because it was close to his body, not a natural position per se.
As soon as is saw the replay a second time I was pretty sure it wouldn't be given. It was the right call imo.
He didn’t have much choice, Jones has a niggle so Gakpo started in midfield and was fairly anonymous and Andy struggled behind him also. We done well to get a point, our main problem was not being able to hold on to the ball.
Yeah but if you mean he therefore can't play MF then I'd strongly disagree.
That he should have played earlier.
Go back and watch him on the ball compared to the two new signings and he was so far off it.
Sob reminds me of a leaner more mobile Emre Can.
Could've played Elliott??
Until they saw the replay and said they didn’t think it would be. Those commentators? It’s pathetic how people are so one eyed with var. Ruled out a goal each and got that decision right too.
If the attacking player re-enters from the goal line and becomes involved in play before:
- the next stoppage in play or
- the defending team has played the ball towards the halfway line and it is outside its penalty area
Proximity definitely played a part but if his arm was out it’s given.
No I think he could but if get a DM it would be on a rotation as we have two perfect CM’s now and no CL to rotate our best players to keep them fresh. Everyone will be well rested.
Shame that Prime Fabinho died a year ago
Um... if his arm was out, it wouldn't be close...
Fair enough then. Shame. Would have been a sensational smash and grab.
Lots of our fans moan about him starting and go back to our 11 game run at the end of last season when he got dropped.
Yeah I know that.
I'm saying we shouldn't have bought Szoboszlai and instead just moved Trent.
It's too fucking late now though. We're stuck with this hopeless bullshit that Trent can play 2 positions at once. It'll completely fuck us over imo.
Chelsea players were so good under pressure. We really struggled to win the ball back today.
Enzo was sublime at skipping out of a tackle.
Enzo was sublime at skipping out of a tackle.
Did I criticize either goal being ruled out, Pat? Or did I just talk about the one decision that I feel they got wrong..? But carry on, mate. As you were...
- Status
