You mean 10 points?
No. City are 9 points behind Utd. They have taken 2 points from their games against us. If we hadn't gifted them those points, which was LTW's comment, City would have 2 points fewer, meaning they'd be 11 points behind.
You mean 10 points?
No. City are 9 points behind Utd. They have taken 2 points from their games against us. If we hadn't gifted them those points, which was LTW's comment, City would have 2 points fewer, meaning they'd be 11 points behind.
I see. I assumed you were talking about today's result.
Mind you if we had got the result we deserved against Utd at Anfield they would have 3 points less.
In fact I would go so far as to say that if your auntie had balls she'd be your uncle.
You need to direct your age-old put-down to TLW who brought up the points issue in the first place but got it wrong, which, frankly, is bit shoddy from a such a devoted fan of a game based on points.
Someone correc Tal's spelling of my name ... This is a bit shoddy for such an intelligent lad.
Soz, LTW, I'll do it, at the same time as adding a 't' to the end of 'correc'. Right. Let's move on.
We're getting better and better but keep getting let down by individual errors by the same culprits. The sooner we sit down in the Summer and sort it out, the better.
We say this often ... almost every season ... I can honestly hope that we've done our scouting well for the summer - and the 40 mill + Carroll will be spent on a top goalkeeper in the Courtois bracket, a dominating CB and another midfield general (preferably more defenisve minded).
I wouldn't be arsed if we cash in on our defensive diamond in the Summer. We need new blood.
It's for Rodgers to sort out, but I feel we're on the right path.
The City fans booing Sturridge at the end of the game shows what a shower of wankers they have become.
Yaya made some great comments about us earlier in the season, and I'd wager after that game that he hasn't changed his mind. Sure, Rodgers has been hit and miss, but in a season of transition, if we're looking for signs of it coming together, then the last week has taught us alot. The potential is there, but the flaws that need addressing are glaringly obvious.
Not least given the fact that he had the class not to celebrate his goal.
You really think he was that injured so he couldnt completely 4 mins more? And what was then the point of not throwing on the other streiker, or Sterling or even Shelvey. We basicly killer our momenter by throwing on Allen. They were shaky and the game were there to be won. And we throw on an average Joe who can't attack nor defend and is in poo form on top of it? Those silly desicions makes me wonder... The last thing we needed in the final runin was Joe Allen.Yeah, always a stupid idea to sub injured players
Lol.I'm not convinced they'd start in the first place - the odd one or two might, but mostly I suspect they couldn't be @rsed.
Lol.I thought hey booed him predominantly because he scored when the ball wasn't kicked out for dzekos pussyness.
You really think he was that injured so he couldnt completely 4 mins more? And what was then the point of not throwing on the other streiker, or Sterling or even Shelvey. We basicly killer our momenter by throwing on Allen. They were shaky and the game were there to be won. And we throw on an average Joe who can't attack nor defend and is in poo form on top of it? Those silly desicions makes me wonder... The last thing we needed in the final runin was Joe Allen.
When we win the league (in the next 20 years), do you promise to tell me the greatest secret still puzzling me about life ... Why Tal?