You make it sound like he's had one good game there. This is all getting a bit agenda-ish really, someone posted positive stuff about Henderson in the thread with the same name, and your first response is stats about Allen. We get it, you like Lucas and Allen. They've all contributed, some more than others, there's also been times when regardless of who's played, we've missed that something extra, so there's room for improvement from all of them and there's no names set in stone about who's the better option, it's horses for courses. It's great that we have so many options, but there's no point in this constant "yeah but when Lucas/Allen plays they run a mile more than everyone else". Really, what's the point? We've done well with different combinations, the only important stat really is where we are as a result, whatever the lineup, it's clear that they're ALL doing more right than wrong.