Skrtel is 30. This is long term. Great signing
Agree SO
Whirly - Skrtel isn't there to score goals, it's a plus, not a necessity.
Well, what's the point if we could play Sakho instead?
Sakho is better on the ball, better at reading the game, and the same physicality. Viewed as a long term option, so minutes would be important, has big money invested in him, and not a liability defending set pieces.
Sakho didnt inspire confidence in me at all.
I think I would go with Skrtel and Lovren.
I would have Agger as LB cover and Sakho and Toure at CB cover.
But the you just go with form right?
Yeah I know. Look, I'm not convinced by Skrtel, he's had mixed seasons, I think he's been given some unwarranted stick and unwarranted praise at times but I do think he's progressively become more dominant at the back, to the point where he can essentially step up to being the marshall and leader *if* he comes of age, we settle the backline AND he cuts out the fucking around.
But like I said, the system itself is as much of the flaw as the personnel. Lovren does have that calmness about him, he reads the game well and leads in a similar way to Hyppia, I'm just not convinced as to whether Sakho is an able partner. He could be, don't get me wrong, we just seem to have as many questions as we've always had. Lovren and Agger are too similar, Skrtel and Sakho are too similar, we have a fullback on his last legs who can't defend, an indecisive keeper and a midfield that gives as much protection as a chocolate fireguard.
Enrique is shit and always injured, Manquillo will struggle out there as he plays for a different team in a different country and Flannagan is hopeless.Do we really need Agger as 4th choice LB cover?
I figure Enrique, Manquillo, and Flanagan would be ahead of him. And he's not very good out there anyways.
Enrique is shit and always injured, Manquillo will struggle out there as he plays for a different team in a different country and Flannagan is hopeless.
So yeah, Agger who can play CB, LB or at a pinch DM should be kept unless good money is on offer.
8m plusWhat's good money to you?
8m plus
I'm not convinced Sakho and Skrtel are all that similar personally. They're both physical players, but Sakho is much better on the ball. When we have him in that LCB role, it feels like we play from defense to midfield much more quickly, as he picks a pass to move us forward. I don't think Skrtel brings that that to the table, and playing 2 CBs who have that capability would be huge. Sakho's also a bit pacier, which I like in our CBs.
It's also worth noting that as far as CBs 25 and under go, Sakho is as good as they come. Marquinhos, Varane, Nastasic, Mangala, Toprak, and Lovren are the other notable ones for me. You don't find good first team CBs under the age of 25 that often, so I think it would behoove us to prioritize the Lovren-Sakho partnership. Not too many clubs around the world have the luxury of having two quality, young CBs who they can coach to fit the system.
Enrique is shit and always injured, Manquillo will struggle out there as he plays for a different team in a different country and Flannagan is hopeless.
So yeah, Agger who can play CB, LB or at a pinch DM should be kept unless good money is on offer.
Is Sakho really that much quicker? He looks pretty flat footed to me when chasing back, generally when we've been caught on the break it's usually been Skrtel as the man getting back. I think they're both mobile enough without either being particularly pacy. I also think they can look uncertain on the ball, the stats might state that Sakho plays the completed pass X amount of times, but Skrtel seems fairly adept these days at bringing the ball out from the back, playing a decent ball and looking fairly comfortable while doing it, Sakho by comparison does look awkward and capable of the odd fuck up by miscontrolling the ball.
Is Sakho really that much quicker? He looks pretty flat footed to me when chasing back, generally when we've been caught on the break it's usually been Skrtel as the man getting back. I think they're both mobile enough without either being particularly pacy. I also think they can look uncertain on the ball, the stats might state that Sakho plays the completed pass X amount of times, but Skrtel seems fairly adept these days at bringing the ball out from the back, playing a decent ball and looking fairly comfortable while doing it, Sakho by comparison does look awkward and capable of the odd fuck up by miscontrolling the ball.
I just seems to me that the right footers aren't really complimenting the left footers, other than Skrtel and Agger, and it's been a partnership that's been there for ages without really getting off the ground.
If he gives Lovren/Sakho a go then I'm all for it, but I'm not convinced that those two personnel will paper over the other gaping holes in the setup, unless we start addressing it head on and proving it on the pitch.
Last season Skrtel improved in bringing the out, something he has been pretty poor at in previous seasons.
I can never get over the fact that people think Sakho's passing off just because he looks awkward. The stats tell you how successful he is (even though he does tend to telegraph it at times) and he also seems to play a lot more forward passes than Skrtel.
A Lovren-Sakho partnership would be my first choice, the only negative for me would be that we would be losing Skrtel's dominant heading in our box.
Not by a gaping margin, but I'd definitely say he's a bit quicker. Skrtel's the man getting back in that pairing because Sakho's usually a bit more advanced, picking out passes with the midfield, and facilitating the play.
Like I said, Skrtel has created this mirage of him being a ball playing CB by just passing to the next guy. Tons of high percentage short passes that come right back to him, or the next guy makes the incisive move. Even Mignolet knows this, whenever we use this pairing, he rolls the ball out to Sakho as he knows giving it to Skrtel isn't the best option. The other thing Skrtel would do is constantly play the pass to Johnson, usually when he was in a tight spot. Now Johnson was really shit this season, but this exacerbated the issues, as Johnson did nothing with the ball on the wing, would be given no space, but both would get a ton of touches inflating their stats.
I'm lovren this, when the opposition attack our defence they will just get aggero and will fall like skrtels or a sakho spuds
Sakho didnt inspire confidence in me at all.
I think I would go with Skrtel and Lovren.
I would have Agger as LB cover and Sakho and Toure at CB cover.
But the you just go with form right?
Ask yourself, what would Mamadou?
Enrique is shit and always injured, Manquillo will struggle out there as he plays for a different team in a different country and Flannagan is hopeless.
So yeah, Agger who can play CB, LB or at a pinch DM should be kept unless good money is on offer.