• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Is nobody going to say it?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I can't for the life of me understand how Ferguson can think that Suarez is a disgrace to LFC when people like Cantona and Keane were a part of the Scum's recent history.
 
He doesn't. What he really thinks - knows, in fact - is that his team can't handle Suarez when he's on song, so he's going about it a different way.
 
[quote author=Judge Jules link=topic=48657.msg1482782#msg1482782 date=1329256871]
He doesn't. What he really thinks - knows, in fact - is that his team can't handle Suarez when he's on song, so he's going about it a different way.
[/quote]

Yeah the worst finisher in the Premiership is frightening everyone
 
Which will tire first, your fingers from being stuck in your ears or your voice from going "Lalalalalalalalalalalalalala" all the time?
 
[quote author=monsieurdantes link=topic=48657.msg1482778#msg1482778 date=1329256404]
You're getting much better at understanding my posts.
[/quote]

Yes, I was always in danger of succumbing to your ability to sound nearly sane in your posts.
 
[quote author=i_rushie link=topic=48657.msg1482789#msg1482789 date=1329257757]
[quote author=monsieurdantes link=topic=48657.msg1482778#msg1482778 date=1329256404]
You're getting much better at understanding my posts.
[/quote]

Yes, I was always in danger of succumbing to your ability to sound nearly sane in your posts.
[/quote]

Yes, imagine if you or someone else did. Perhaps you might draft a legal disclaimer for me to append to the bottom of my posts?
 
[quote author=Rosco link=topic=48657.msg1482783#msg1482783 date=1329256918]
Yeah the worst finisher in the Premiership is frightening everyone
[/quote]

Give over Ross, it has to be clear by now that unsettling Suarez must have been at the forefront of ol' whiskeynose's mind. Just read the litany of criticism aimed at Suarez before the match, clearly aimed at dealing with Suarez when he is on song because his team can't deal with Suarez. For example:

http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/s...tions-liverpool-over-luis-suarez-case?cc=3436

Manchester United manager Sir Alex Ferguson has questioned Liverpool's handling of the Luis Suarez racism case as the two rival clubs prepare to meet at Old Trafford.

Suarez and Patrice Evra are set to meet again on Saturday after the pair were involved in a well-documented fracas at Anfield in October. The Uruguayan received an eight-match ban for his part in the incident, which remains an inflammatory subject between the old foes.

Liverpool boss Kenny Dalglish claimed Suarez should never have been suspended in the first place as Suarez made his comeback from suspension against Tottenham on Monday night.

However, Ferguson says he cannot understand why Liverpool did not continue their attempts to clear Suarez's name if Dalglish believes the ban was unjust.

"Well, why didn't they appeal?" said Ferguson. "They've said plenty, haven't they?

"We've kept our dignity throughout. We've kept our counsel. That is the right thing to do in these situations. We'll keep it that way too, and just concentrate on the game."

Ferguson has no concerns about Evra's ability to keep his cool after the United captain was subjected to constant barracking from the Liverpool supporters in United's FA Cup defeat at Anfield recently.

"Patrice has handled it well," said Ferguson. "I don't think he enjoyed the abuse he got at Anfield but it happens.

"Gary Neville had it for 15 years. Wayne Rooney gets it when he plays against them. We expected that and so did Patrice."

Pick out the incessant mention of Suarez - Suarez this Suarez that. Yes, you can see that unsettling our best player to blunt his edge before the match was right at the forefront of ol whiskeynose's mind.
 
[quote author=Rosco link=topic=48657.msg1482783#msg1482783 date=1329256918]
[quote author=Judge Jules link=topic=48657.msg1482782#msg1482782 date=1329256871]
He doesn't. What he really thinks - knows, in fact - is that his team can't handle Suarez when he's on song, so he's going about it a different way.
[/quote]

Yeah the worst finisher in the Premiership is frightening everyone
[/quote]

Indeed he is so shit clubs are queuing up like vulures to take him off our hands
 
[quote author=Vlads Quiff link=topic=48657.msg1482841#msg1482841 date=1329264382]
[quote author=Rosco link=topic=48657.msg1482783#msg1482783 date=1329256918]
[quote author=Judge Jules link=topic=48657.msg1482782#msg1482782 date=1329256871]
He doesn't. What he really thinks - knows, in fact - is that his team can't handle Suarez when he's on song, so he's going about it a different way.
[/quote]

Yeah the worst finisher in the Premiership is frightening everyone
[/quote]

Indeed he is so shit clubs are queuing up like vulures to take him off our hands
[/quote]
George, he's on the wind up. Again!
 
[quote author=i_rushie link=topic=48657.msg1482798#msg1482798 date=1329258732]
[quote author=Rosco link=topic=48657.msg1482783#msg1482783 date=1329256918]
Yeah the worst finisher in the Premiership is frightening everyone
[/quote]

Give over Ross, it has to be clear by now that unsettling Suarez must have been at the forefront of ol' whiskeynose's mind. Just read the litany of criticism aimed at Suarez before the match, clearly aimed at dealing with Suarez when he is on song because his team can't deal with Suarez. For example:

http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/s...tions-liverpool-over-luis-suarez-case?cc=3436

Manchester United manager Sir Alex Ferguson has questioned Liverpool's handling of the Luis Suarez racism case as the two rival clubs prepare to meet at Old Trafford.

Suarez and Patrice Evra are set to meet again on Saturday after the pair were involved in a well-documented fracas at Anfield in October. The Uruguayan received an eight-match ban for his part in the incident, which remains an inflammatory subject between the old foes.

Liverpool boss Kenny Dalglish claimed Suarez should never have been suspended in the first place as Suarez made his comeback from suspension against Tottenham on Monday night.

However, Ferguson says he cannot understand why Liverpool did not continue their attempts to clear Suarez's name if Dalglish believes the ban was unjust.

"Well, why didn't they appeal?" said Ferguson. "They've said plenty, haven't they?

"We've kept our dignity throughout. We've kept our counsel. That is the right thing to do in these situations. We'll keep it that way too, and just concentrate on the game."

Ferguson has no concerns about Evra's ability to keep his cool after the United captain was subjected to constant barracking from the Liverpool supporters in United's FA Cup defeat at Anfield recently.

"Patrice has handled it well," said Ferguson. "I don't think he enjoyed the abuse he got at Anfield but it happens.

"Gary Neville had it for 15 years. Wayne Rooney gets it when he plays against them. We expected that and so did Patrice."

Pick out the incessant mention of Suarez - Suarez this Suarez that. Yes, you can see that unsettling our best player to blunt his edge before the match was right at the forefront of ol whiskeynose's mind.
[/quote]

You're right, of course. Nothing will have been further from Ferguson's mind since Suarez tore them a new one first time out. The various public references since then to Suarez being a diver and a cheat, Ferguson's very personal involvement in the whole Evra business, his comments afterwards (which even his toadies in the press have been unable to defend) - all good fun and jolly good companee.
 
Well Judge ... You have to admit, like i_rushie, that our managers (Kenny / Rafa / Roy) all used the media to advertise what a diver and cheat Ronaldo was, not to mention Nani ... We did start that nasty trend ... we can't really complain.
 
[quote author=i_rushie link=topic=48657.msg1482789#msg1482789 date=1329257757]
[quote author=monsieurdantes link=topic=48657.msg1482778#msg1482778 date=1329256404]
You're getting much better at understanding my posts.
[/quote]

Yes, I was always in danger of succumbing to your ability to sound nearly sane in your posts.
[/quote]

His nuttiness is seemingly infectious
 
[quote author=LeTallecWiz link=topic=48657.msg1482938#msg1482938 date=1329301945]
Well Judge ... You have to admit, like i_rushie, that our managers (Kenny / Rafa / Roy) all used the media to advertise what a diver and cheat Ronaldo was, not to mention Nani ... We did start that nasty trend ... we can't really complain.
[/quote]

Roy? Who was agreeing with Fergie that Torres was a diver? Get a grip man.

Rafas attack was the one man who stood up against what we still see today. the media turned against hiom straight away. Besides that he was not on about divers.

I can't rememeber anyone giving Nani or Ronaldo any word of anything...
 
Neither can I, especially not Kenny. Even if there *are* any quotes I've missed, they most definitely didn't "start that nasty trend". I don't know for sure that Ferguson did, but that's where the smart money would be.
 
Of course we should complain. If Suarez weren't a diver and a cheat. But he really comes across as one, so it's you could construe those comments as mere observation or a carefully orchestrated vendetta.

Then beyond his involvement as a witness and then in bringing it to the attention of the referee, what was the true extent of his "personal involvement in the whole Evra business"? By the same token, did Kenny's "personal involvement" in talking to the ref indicate some conspiracy to besmirch Evra's reputation? What about Kuyt's or Commolli's?

Above all, if he was really so worried about Suarez's ability to tear his defence a new one, why wait till post-game to brand him a disgrace? I can't for the life of me think why he wouldn't have taken the initiative to psyche Suarez out before the game, and throw him off, as opposed to post-game? What was the point? Make sure Suarez is a quivering bundle of nerves for the next Liverpool-Scum encounter next season?

Oh, he tries to come across as a wily ol fox alright, but I've never thought he had the subtlety or patience for mind games or for such a protracted return on an insult. He's simply had the good fortune of coming up against the likes of Keegan and Wenger, who aren't great at keeping their emotions under wraps.
 
The cause for complaint isn't accuracy or otherwise, it's the act of commenting individually on a player in another team. Despite Wizzy's assertion to the contrary I genuinely don't recall managers from other clubs making nearly as many such remarks as Ferguson down through the years.

Kuyt and Comolli were questioned. I'm not sure whether Kenny approached the ref or was questioned himself, but either way Ferguson got his oar in first and we'll never know what would (or, more to the point, wouldn't) have happened in the absence of that. The main answer to your question though is that Evra's initial version of events, to French TV at pitchside, brushed the incident off, whereas half an hour or so later it had grown into this cause celebre and in every report that I saw at the time it was Ferguson, not Evra himself, who took the lead in making that report.

Why wait till after the game before taking a pop at Suarez? Er, he didn't. He's been on Suarez' case ever since Suarez embarrassed him and his team on that first occasion.
 
Look everyone! Another conspiracy! Marca is now trying to win Suarez's favour in order to lure him to Madrid by reporting favourably! Why is the world against us?!

(I've unashamedly plagiarized the translation below from a post by Neil G on TLW)

http://www.marca.com/2012/02/14/futbol/futbol_internacional/resto_de_america/1329222305.html

According to a witness, Evra tried to assault Suárez at half-time

- "It was good he was stopped by several people, otherwise he would have eaten him", a source said.

- 'Lucho' was going to shake his hand, but he noticed the Frenchman withdrew his arm when he saw him

Polemic between Luis Suárez and Patrice Evra - the Uruguayan didn't shake hands with him during the initial ceremony at the United-Liverpool match - has a new ramification. Sources in the inner circle of the player were surprised by Lucho not shaking hands, since he had committed with his relatives to do it with the Frenchman "in order to avoid more criticism".

Then, what happened in the end? Why didn't the handshaking take place? Suarez was very upset with the Frenchman. He believes that he coldly broke a player's code - what happens in the pitch, stays there - by accusing the charrua of being racist, and without any actual proof supporting it. But, Suárez was going to shake hands with him anyway.

Evra was offering his hand to the red players. When Suárez was coming before him, he put his hand down and barely offered it, to which Luis, in a mistake he himself recognized afterwards, denied him his own hand. "I swear for my daughter - the most sacred person to Luis - that I was going to shake my hand with him", Suárez confessed to his intimates.

What happened in the tunnel?

Ever since the first incident between the two players in October, British press is demonizing Suárez, accusing him of racism all over. There is a detail that MARCA reveals today that might change the general aspect of the story.

According to a witness questioned by this periodical, as the first half ended, and in the tunnel, Evra ran towards Suárez and tried to assault him from the back. "It was a good thing that Skertl, Agger and Kuyt stopped him; otherwise he would have eaten Suárez", the aforementioned source told MARCA.com. A detail the press has failed to report in England, a place where Evra is treated as if he were a saint, despite of the fact that at the end of the match, and having already won it, tried to provoke the Uruguayan jumping into his face. Suárez did not react to the provocation. But, as MARCA.com reveals today, Evra is no saint.
 
[quote author=Rosco link=topic=48657.msg1482783#msg1482783 date=1329256918]
[quote author=Judge Jules link=topic=48657.msg1482782#msg1482782 date=1329256871]
He doesn't. What he really thinks - knows, in fact - is that his team can't handle Suarez when he's on song, so he's going about it a different way.
[/quote]

Yeah the worst finisher in the Premiership is frightening everyone
[/quote]

You're missing the point with your headstrong, one tracked, black and white (pardon the pun) analysis once again. I guess the fact he tore them a new one last season and created three of our goals escaped your attention. Or does a player just have to score goals to be a threat? And if that's the case, wouldn't that piss all over your anti-Robbie Keane agenda?

As you were...
 
[quote author=i_rushie link=topic=48657.msg1482947#msg1482947 date=1329302917]
Of course we should complain. If Suarez weren't a diver and a cheat. But he really comes across as one, so it's you could construe those comments as mere observation or a carefully orchestrated vendetta.

Then beyond his involvement as a witness and then in bringing it to the attention of the referee, what was the true extent of his "personal involvement in the whole Evra business"? By the same token, did Kenny's "personal involvement" in talking to the ref indicate some conspiracy to besmirch Evra's reputation? What about Kuyt's or Commolli's?

Above all, if he was really so worried about Suarez's ability to tear his defence a new one, why wait till post-game to brand him a disgrace? I can't for the life of me think why he wouldn't have taken the initiative to psyche Suarez out before the game, and throw him off, as opposed to post-game? What was the point? Make sure Suarez is a quivering bundle of nerves for the next Liverpool-Scum encounter next season?

Oh, he tries to come across as a wily ol fox alright, but I've never thought he had the subtlety or patience for mind games or for such a protracted return on an insult. He's simply had the good fortune of coming up against the likes of Keegan and Wenger, who aren't great at keeping their emotions under wraps.
[/quote]

if you remmeber back to the November game, Fergie was at him already then. Branding him "diving all over the place". How does he get waway with that from the FA and the PFA I dont know, but if you see that game the only guy diving was Downing. I cant see one particular event in the whole game saying Luis dived. Still fergie had a go at him, and noone else?

And another point is that whenever Rooney elbows someone or Rafael throws himself tot eh ground or whoever of his vegetables does something he shouldnt, we don't see a clan of oppsoit managers having a go do we? They mostly stick to their own business and let the autorities handle it as they should, which in most cases is to let the villain go.
 
[quote author=Judge Jules link=topic=48657.msg1482951#msg1482951 date=1329303507]
Why wait till after the game before taking a pop at Suarez? Er, he didn't. He's been on Suarez' case ever since Suarez embarrassed him and his team on that first occasion.
[/quote]

Well that was a convenient way of avoiding the elephant in the room. Anyway, it's clear as crystal we're never going to agree, so I'm going to leave it at that. Besides, I'm sick and tired of feeling sorry for Liverpool FC, feeling suspicious about media antipathy (or sometimes even acclaim), having the Hicks and Gilette ownership debacle dominate headlines, listening to the FSG takeover play out in the courts and the media, watching Fernando Torres "leave to join a bigger club", then watch the racism sage unfold with the dawning realization that our lawyers have messed up (yet again), and now getting embroiled in a petty meaningless ruckus about a handshake! It's bloody wonder we got to watch any football at all in the past few years!
 
[quote author=Insignificance link=topic=48657.msg1482957#msg1482957 date=1329304371]
[quote author=i_rushie link=topic=48657.msg1482947#msg1482947 date=1329302917]
Of course we should complain. If Suarez weren't a diver and a cheat. But he really comes across as one, so it's you could construe those comments as mere observation or a carefully orchestrated vendetta.

Then beyond his involvement as a witness and then in bringing it to the attention of the referee, what was the true extent of his "personal involvement in the whole Evra business"? By the same token, did Kenny's "personal involvement" in talking to the ref indicate some conspiracy to besmirch Evra's reputation? What about Kuyt's or Commolli's?

Above all, if he was really so worried about Suarez's ability to tear his defence a new one, why wait till post-game to brand him a disgrace? I can't for the life of me think why he wouldn't have taken the initiative to psyche Suarez out before the game, and throw him off, as opposed to post-game? What was the point? Make sure Suarez is a quivering bundle of nerves for the next Liverpool-Scum encounter next season?

Oh, he tries to come across as a wily ol fox alright, but I've never thought he had the subtlety or patience for mind games or for such a protracted return on an insult. He's simply had the good fortune of coming up against the likes of Keegan and Wenger, who aren't great at keeping their emotions under wraps.
[/quote]

if you remmeber back to the November game, Fergie was at him already then. Branding him "diving all over the place". How does he get waway with that from the FA and the PFA I dont know, but if you see that game the only guy diving was Downing. I cant see one particular event in the whole game saying Luis dived. Still fergie had a go at him, and noone else?

And another point is that whenever Rooney elbows someone or Rafael throws himself tot eh ground or whoever of his vegetables does something he shouldnt, we don't see a clan of oppsoit managers having a go do we? They mostly stick to their own business and let the autorities handle it as they should, which in most cases is to let the villain go.
[/quote]

The point is, Suarez had earned his reputation for diving long before the first league match -v- the scum. It was all commentators pointed out in the first couple of months of the season. It was all "What a brilliant player, that Suarez, BUT..." Even this forum debated his tendency to go to ground. You can choose to regard it as a carefully orchestrated vendetta by ol whiskeynose, or you could construe it as a commonly shared observation. If you think it's the former, then perhaps you'd be so kind as to answer the next question I bolded for you?
 
I thought it was obvious I was taking the piss ...

None of the our managers have made comments about Ronaldo/Nani like Ferguson did about Suarez ...
 
[quote author=i_rushie link=topic=48657.msg1482970#msg1482970 date=1329305797]
[quote author=Insignificance link=topic=48657.msg1482957#msg1482957 date=1329304371]
[quote author=i_rushie link=topic=48657.msg1482947#msg1482947 date=1329302917]
Of course we should complain. If Suarez weren't a diver and a cheat. But he really comes across as one, so it's you could construe those comments as mere observation or a carefully orchestrated vendetta.

Then beyond his involvement as a witness and then in bringing it to the attention of the referee, what was the true extent of his "personal involvement in the whole Evra business"? By the same token, did Kenny's "personal involvement" in talking to the ref indicate some conspiracy to besmirch Evra's reputation? What about Kuyt's or Commolli's?

Above all, if he was really so worried about Suarez's ability to tear his defence a new one, why wait till post-game to brand him a disgrace? I can't for the life of me think why he wouldn't have taken the initiative to psyche Suarez out before the game, and throw him off, as opposed to post-game? What was the point? Make sure Suarez is a quivering bundle of nerves for the next Liverpool-Scum encounter next season?

Oh, he tries to come across as a wily ol fox alright, but I've never thought he had the subtlety or patience for mind games or for such a protracted return on an insult. He's simply had the good fortune of coming up against the likes of Keegan and Wenger, who aren't great at keeping their emotions under wraps.
[/quote]

if you remmeber back to the November game, Fergie was at him already then. Branding him "diving all over the place". How does he get waway with that from the FA and the PFA I dont know, but if you see that game the only guy diving was Downing. I cant see one particular event in the whole game saying Luis dived. Still fergie had a go at him, and noone else?

And another point is that whenever Rooney elbows someone or Rafael throws himself tot eh ground or whoever of his vegetables does something he shouldnt, we don't see a clan of oppsoit managers having a go do we? They mostly stick to their own business and let the autorities handle it as they should, which in most cases is to let the villain go.
[/quote]

The point is, Suarez had earned his reputation for diving long before the first league match -v- the scum. It was all commentators pointed out in the first couple of months of the season. It was all "What a brilliant player, that Suarez, BUT..." Even this forum debated his tendency to go to ground. You can choose to regard it as a carefully orchestrated vendetta by ol whiskeynose, or you could construe it as a commonly shared observation. If you think it's the former, then perhaps you'd be so kind as to answer the next question I bolded for you?
[/quote]

You can also choose to see it as it was, namely a media bandwagon which Ferguson's comments set rolling in the first place. Nobody that I know, including yours truly, has alleged any pre-planned conspiracy to do it. None would have been necessary. And given that his actions had been instrumental in getting Suarez banned for 8 games until just before the latest game against ManUre, I rather suspect he was satisfied he'd done enough winding-up to be going on with.
 
[quote author=LeTallecWiz link=topic=48657.msg1482975#msg1482975 date=1329305987]
I thought it was obvious I was taking the piss ...

None of the our managers have made comments about Ronaldo/Nani like Ferguson did about Suarez ...
[/quote]

Well I took the piss too 😉

Sorry, should have seen the obvious 🙂
 
Suarez's actions were instrumental in getting himself banned. And until you acknowledge that you're going to continue with the hair brained conspiracy theories that are frankly well below you. Or used to be anyway.
 
[quote author=i_rushie link=topic=48657.msg1482961#msg1482961 date=1329304900]
Well that was a convenient way of avoiding the elephant in the room. Anyway, it's clear as crystal we're never going to agree, so I'm going to leave it at that. Besides, I'm sick and tired of feeling sorry for Liverpool FC, feeling suspicious about media antipathy (or sometimes even acclaim), having the Hicks and Gilette ownership debacle dominate headlines, listening to the FSG takeover play out in the courts and the media, watching Fernando Torres "leave to join a bigger club", then watch the racism sage unfold with the dawning realization that our lawyers have messed up (yet again), and now getting embroiled in a petty meaningless ruckus about a handshake! It's bloody wonder we got to watch any football at all in the past few years!

[/quote]

Like this post, it's pretty sad really. So much drama over past few years
 
Without Ferguson taking the matter up, it would have been left at Evra's pitchside dismissal of it, which is where it belonged because there was no racist intent in what Suarez said and Evra as a Spanish speaker knew it. Everything else, including Suarez' own ill-advised honesty afterwards, takes second place to that. And until *you* face up to *that*, instead of doing your determined "See No Evil" bit, you're going to continue looking faintly pitiful.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom