• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Grantland: "Merseyside Midfielders on the Rise"

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dirkus_Circus

Well-Known
Member
Coutinho: You Should Be Very Afraid



Mike Goodman: Philippe Coutinho is downright terrifying. That’s really all there is to it. Technically he starts on the left side of Liverpool’s three-man attacking front line, but in reality that left-sided position is somewhere between a vague suggestion and a dirty, dirty lie. In reality, Coutinho is as close to a classic attacking “no. 10” playmaker as the Premier League has. When Liverpool are in possession he comes off the left side and takes up positions all over the field to receive passes and turn and create for the attackers ahead of him. There’s close to zero positional bias in where he receives the ball. He’s all over the field.

iYFyNfB4tRICy.jpg


From those positions he created six chances, more than anybody else in the Premier League this weekend except for Eden Hazard of Chelsea, who also had six. He was also the only player in the Premier League to complete more than one through ball, ripping apart Stoke’s defense both times he tried it. Part of what makes Coutinho so fun to watch is the degree of difficulty of what he’s attempting, which is why his 80 percent completion rate isn’t troublesome. Of his nine incomplete passes, seven happened where they are least dangerous to his team. It’s also why the chances he creates are so valuable. Five of the six chances he created were from open play, and four of them were passes that players received inside the penalty area, meaning that the shots they took were high-quality shots. Coutinho doesn’t just pass the rock, he finds guys who are wide open at the rim.

ip9PInfgKvirv.jpg


The worrying thing for Liverpool is that despite the dynamite performance from Coutinho, an only slightly less impressive debut from Iago Aspas, and a goal from Daniel Sturridge, the team still came within a penalty save of coming away with only a draw. The Reds have had a problem converting shots over the past two seasons, and opening the season by taking 25 shots, with 17 of them from inside the penalty area, and walking away with only one goal is a troubling continuation of a trend. It’s tempting to attribute those results to Stoke’s Asmir Begovic absolutely standing on his head to deny Liverpool. The man did make 10 saves, including a whopping eight on shots from inside his penalty area. But at some point, and probably some point soon, Liverpool need to improve their finishing to make strides forward in the league.

http://www.grantland.com/blog/the-t...s-and-move-merseyside-midfielders-on-the-rise
 
Why will you never see analysis like this in a newspaper ?

I don't know, cos if they offered consistent analysis like this for all top sides & it wasn't available on their online sites it may well persuade real fans to spend the cash on the deadtree versions of the paper.

Opinion & analysis based 'news' should be their focus as they're useless for actual news now as they're at least 12 hours behind the Internet news.
 
Yeah but this is niche interest stuff, which, as you can see from this example, the internet is perfect for as well.

The reality is that even mega geeks aren't going to pay for something when they can get it free online.
 
Yeah but you don't get that regularly for each side.

It's niche interest cos it's about coutinho, but that style of analysis should be standard for pretty much any player. Sure, pad it out with a bit of hyperbole & potential transfer fees next summer by all means, but it'd still be ten times better than the usual rehashed match report cut & paste jobs that accompany most player reports in the mainstream papers.
 
I don't think most people want to read that kind of stuff.

Maybe they could get away with it in a couple papers like The Guardian.
 
I mean in-depth tactical analysis is niche interest, full stop. I just don't believe it's of much interest to a general newspaper audience. Probably 90% of those who'd potentially want to read this stuff are already doing so online: there are plenty of sites doing it now. This is just my intuition talking so it could be bollocks, but I'd say that people with a specific, nerdy, interest in a subject are generally going to be willing to spend time seeking the information out, and also naturally tend to be more open to the internet in general.

Bascially I think it's too small a group, and too savvy, for newspapers to be able to profitably tap into.
 
Perhaps you're right, but I'd argue the likes of the times & the Guardian would benefit from it.

The red tops won't be harmed as much by digital media anyway cos they're about exclusive controversy & scandal more than news anyway, I feel it's broadsheets that have the most to lose to digital media de to the factual nature of what they report & the behaviour & social status of their readers making them more likely to use a tablet daily & access digital media by other means.
 
Tbh mate I'm just not convinced traditional newspapers can be saved. There are so many things against them already and it'll only get worse as the web gets more and more sophisticated.

IMO there is no great underlying demand for 'news' as such. It's just there seems to be because technology dictated that all kinds of different things got lumped in together and sold as one. I think what most people have is 3 or 4 areas of particular interest - sport, foreign affairs, scandal, politics, whatever. Who actually reads all of a newspaper? Now the technology exists for those things to be delivered separately it won't be long before the truth dawns that trying to be all things to all men is just completely behind the times.

IMO of course!
 
I wouldnt read it unless I was stuck somewhere with nothing else to do.
I dont read it on here, I find it really dull.
 
I actually agree with that Peter, medium to long term newspapers won't exist. At least not in any recognisable form.

Anyway, we best leave this here, before Ross sees this debate in a football thread & has a coronary.
 
Why will you never see analysis like this in a newspaper ?


Rory Fitz gives an analysis as good, if not better, than this every week on here and about 2 people thank him for it and/or like it.

Meanwhile, the random tits thread is going gangbusters.
 
Rory Fitz gives an analysis as good, if not better, than this every week on here and about 2 people thank him for it and/or like it.

Meanwhile, the random tits thread is going gangbusters.

I fucking love his analysis.

In fact it was me who asked him to post them here instead of just on his blog.

Hang on... we have a random tits thread?

*runs off to search for it*
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom