• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Gerrard

Status
Not open for further replies.
Whilst I agree with the basic point that Gerrard could play in any system, it's quite clear that he's finding the current one a little problematic. The emphasis for so many years has been Stevie to do something special - indeed, our over-dependence on him was cited as one of our biggest problems by many. The "one-man team" accusations were frequent, and for long periods, perfectly justified. With the emphasis now firmly on the team rather than any individual, I think he's struggling a bit with the adjustment.

Under Rodgers, we are expected to build the attacks gradually, and patiently - something which is an almost alien concept to Stevie. Stevie has always been about urgency - he likes to find the quickest route to goal, whether it be with a bursting run from midfield, or a defence-splitting pass from range. What's more, he's not used to playing the ball simply - he likes to find a bit of space and pick out an eye-catching pass ahead of him. Again, this doesn't fit a system designed to move the ball quickly, and progress the team fluidly as a unit. Particularly when he doesn't have a Torres forever making runs in behind the opposition's defence.

Lastly, I think there is an element of ego involved. Not only does Stevie have to adapt to a new way of playing, but he has to accept that his role has diminished somewhat these days. He's been accepting the plaudits for his majestic displays for most of his career, and he probably misses the adulation that went with that, and perhaps wants to recapture it again. I certainly get that impression at times watching him play. There's certainly an element of him trying too hard, and I don't think he displays the same patience as some of his team mates.

On the face of it, it appears that the new system does not play to to his strengths. However, as dmishra says, Stevie is one of finest footballers of his generation. His strengths are many, and there will always be room to accommodate someone with his skill set, whatever the sytem. There's no reason why he can't play his trademark probing passes under Rodger's - I think he just has to learn when to do it, and perhaps place a greater emphasis on short passes. He's getting a schooling from Joe Allen in that respect, so perhaps it will start to rub off on him.

Fuck me, exactly my thoughts.

Glad this thread had promoted some boss posts
 
Was he really as bad as this thread makes out? No offence to Allan, who seems to be a very good player, but someone has to make an attacking pass at some point in the game and Allan wasn't contributing to the attack at all. Everyone seems to be obsessed with Barcas short passing and long build up play, but they are equally capable of playing an early through ball (Xavi in particular) and there is nothing in the rule book to say Gerrard has to play a short pass sideways every time he gets the ball. It has also been discussed many times on this site in regards to Lucas and Alonso, that you are going to have higher passing success rate if you play the safe pass every time.

I also think Gerrard played a big part in Sterlings performance. Sterling was quiet in the first half and I think Gerrard took it upon himself to bring him into the game by playing attacking passes he could run on to, which coincided with him starting to beat his marker.

The biggest problem is that he is playing too deep, and he doesn't have a lot to work with up front. Rosco was actually quite right when he mentioned that (some*) managers tend to stick to one strategy / formation / system that worked for them in the past rather than building the formation around the players. At the moment, Rodgers is trying to copy Swansea and that means Gerrard is being played out of position. Obviously Lucas being injured is not helping, and why Kenny and Rodgers both chose not to buy a backup is a mystery to me, but in my opinion Gerrard should be closer to the net and the leg work should be done by other players. We have one player in the team who has a proven track record of scoring goals in the prem and he is playing as a deep midfielder.

*Rosco omitted that word, but it would have made his point appear quite rational if he had included it.
 
The idea that Steven Gerrard doesn’t fit a ‘system’ is fucking ridiculous. In fact, this idea of Rodgers of introducing a revolutionary new ‘system’ is even more ridiculous. I am no Rodgers doubter, but the way people talk about him establishing this hitherto unseen high-pressing possession based philosophy is cringeworthy. It isn’t particularly new to the PL or even to Liverpool for that matter. We practiced a half-decent version of it under Benitez, and we shouldn’t assume that our players are so alien or ill-fitted to practice it, least of all one of the finest players of the PL era. This is Steven fucking Gerrard we’re talking about. His powers might be on the wane, but he’s always been good enough to play any ‘system.’

The problem, along with his waning powers, isn’t the system but the position he’s asked to play. He’s never been effective in a deeper position he’s been asked to play so far, and this is a problem Rodgers needs to identify and rectify immediately. I made a post last week where I said the first thing Rodgers needs to fix is the rigidity of the 4-3-3 he’s played so far (i.e. converting it into the more familiar 4-2-3-1 while going forward. Rodgers might have this notion of front six of 3-3 – two banks of three players which equal ability and on the same wavelength to attack as a unit and win back possession from the front – presumably what Barca do, maybe someone can confirm – but the fact of the matter is we don’t have the personnel for that currently, so he needs to improvise and stick to what the squad is far more familiar with). And to Rodgers’ credit, he did exactly that this weekend, except he got the personnel wrong. Gerrard should have been playing the AM role with Shelvey deeper rather than the other way around.

The reason really is very simple. Gerrard is a pretty ordinary central midfielder, and always has been. Central midfield is about sitting in the middle of the park, and rotating and recycling possession efficiently and endlessly. It’s about creating a fulcrum in the centre of the park, and making the sure the front 4, and the two-full backs can push forward together, maintaining shape. It’s not about moving the ball forward, it’s about moving your teammates forward. Xabi Alonso was a master at it, and Joe Allen is proving himself impeccable at it. Gerrard is largely rubbish at it. His instinct is moving the ball forward, not the team. That’s a quality you need in the final third, NOT in the centre of the park. Just watch a highlight reel of Gerrard’s performance against Sunderland – look at the number of times he receives the ball in the centre of the park, dawdles on it, waits for movement from the final, and attempts to play an incisive pass. That isn’t how you fucking play in central midfield. You never dawdle on the ball in the middle of the park – you lay it off, you find space nearby, you recycle possession quickly, and you make sure your front 4, and full-backs are ready to move forward. Gerrard playing central midfield is like a point guard who knows to run the fast-break but is completely clueless in a half-court set-up.

But that’s not his fault – he’s never been a CM. That’s not his skillset, he’s never developed it, Unfortunately, whenever he’s played at CM, he’s been lauded by the media or completely moronic pundits about how fantastic his passing ability is, or how he grabs the game by the scruff of the neck while playing central midfield. It started off as a desire to paint him as Liverpool’s response to Keane/Vieira, and then later as England’s midfield general. Fact of the matter is, he turned out to be a completely different player from both Keane and Vieira, and both Houllier and Benitez always preferred two of Didi, McAllister, Spud, Alonso as their midfield two, and Gerrard as their third. And rightfully so. He was the best damn third midfield of this generation. Better than Lampard, and better than Ballack, who were his contenders for the title then.

And IMO, he can still play that role, and play it well. It isn’t a role that requires legs, or running power, or aggression etc. Those qualities made Gerrard stand out in that role. But it isn’t what made him successful in the first place. In the midst of all those fantastic qualities, people forget how technically gifted Gerrard is. He isn’t just a wonderful athlete, but a wonderfully skilled footballer as well. 150 goals – that’s what he’s scored for us, and there’s this video on Youtube which shows all the goals he’s scored in his career. Here it is, in fact:



There’s stuff in there that the likes of Ronaldinho would’ve been proud of. I did a post a long time back about identifying the best attacking players of this generation using stats – goals and assists. 100 goals, 50 assists, and at least one 20 goal, 15 assist season. Gerrard was one of the few in that list alongside Henry, Ronaldhinho, Messi, Ronaldo. That’s a bloody rare distinction, and you don’t rank there by being an athlete alone. You get there having attacking ability in spades.

And that’s the ability he’s not lost, or is unlikely to lose ever. And it’s why he should always play in the final third. He’s an attacking midfielder, one of the best of this generation. And yeah, he’s no longer the athlete he once was, but he’s still the best attacking midfielder at the club, and that’s where he should play unless we're replacing him with someone considerably better.


Mate, you could've written all that in one sentence - Gerrard needs to play the attacking mid! ;-)
But no matter, some good points there. You've got it slightly wrong about how BR sets up the midfield though. He explained in it some details when he had that conference with the supports groups:
Essentially, in ideal conditions, i.e. with players who understand and can play the system, he has one central midfielder who sits in front of the back four. He sits and dictates the game. The other two midfielders, flanking the CM, are more mobile and move up and down the park, attacking and tracking back as necessary.
For Liverpool, Lucas is obviously meant to be the sitting midfielder. Because he's injured, as you've all guessed, Allen is now the sitting mid.
Against Arsenal, Rodgers played this "one-two" formation, with Gerrard and Sahin the more forward midfielders. We all saw what happened there. Big gaps between the forward midfielders and Allen which Arsenal exploited. Rodgers said Sahin wasn't quite up to it yet.
So, realising he doesn't currently have the players to play one-two, he switched it to two-one, in that there are two sitting midfielders and one more attacking. This is where you were spot on; Allen and Gerrard became the deep lying mids, with Shelvey more forward.
Should Stevie have played more forward? Probably. The problem is Shelvey is an attacking midfielder, not a holding one either, and also as you pointed out, common thinking is that Gerrard can play the more disciplined deeper role.
Personally I think Gerrard and Shelvey play the same position, and it should be one or the other.
Question is, who do you bring in for the other deeper spot while lucas in injured and sahin not up to speed? Hendo?????
 
Surely this has got to be a wind up?


It's a bit tongue-in-cheek, but I do think his best is behind him and that we could build a better midfield unit without him. However, I don't want him to go yet, right now he is one of only 2 players who can turn a game completely on it's head in seconds.
 
Although it's been quite some time since he last turned a game completely on its head in seconds, which is your point.
 
If he's struggling like this come christmas then I would be worried. Right now, I am inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt, somewhat, that injuries and now a new system have hampered his form. We'll never see the Gerrard of old, but he still looks like one of very few who can do something attack-wise.

I'd be a damn sight happier though if he stops giving it away so cheaply, not every ball can be a glorious through ball/30 yard pass to feet.
 
Gerrard should be played up front/AM. He's pants in midfield and, seeing as he's 1 of the very few players we've got who can hit a barn door, he should be playing nearer the oppo's box.
That formation we play, the front 3 have got to be lethal and ours are a million miles away. I mean, our midfield offers nothing in terms of goal threat; Lucas (when he played) is Lucas, Allen is neat and tidy but its hardly stuff that hurts the opposition though is it, Gerrard is well off his game, Sahin being played in, Shelvey middle of the pitch. So, apart from Johnson getting forward (and then leaving gaping holes at the back), we are totally reliant on Borini, Suarez, Sterling and Downing off the bench. Obviously, Sterling has been superb but Borini doesn't look to be all that, he certainly isn't going to weigh in with a hatful anyway, and, as we know, Suarez tucks away 1 chance in 7 apart from a couple of mad days a season when everything he touches turns to gold.
So, yeah, the 'Stevie further forward' argument works for me as well.
 
Is Gerrard really struggling as much as people are suggesting.

I'm heavily in favour of a number of points dmishra has made and refugee's post was spot on. Years ago we had Garcia whom I described as a luxury player - someone who could make something happen but when we couldn't hold the ball well and didn't have many chances he could also be incredibly frustrating. Right now Gerrard is the one endeavouring to make something happen and - along with Suarez - looks the only player to be thinking we need to get the ball in the net. Sure, he makes mistakes (just like Suarez) because he's trying to create something but not as often as Garcia did.

I personally don't think he's been playing anywhere near as badly as many have suggested and he's a long way from being the worst performed player on the pitch. Dmish stole these words before I could write them days ago but Gerrard has played in numerous systems for Liverpool and England over the years and been excellent in all of them. He's got no problems working out how to play in this one. That said, we take that long to move the ball at times it's beyond tedious; we look far better when we move it more quickly.

More of the same needed from Stevie but this time on the inside of the post.
 
stevie is still our best player IMO, its up to Rodgers to fit him in.

I was very interested in the MOTD piece on comparing Allen's passing with Stevie's more direct FORWARD ones.
Stevie is not our best player.
 
I don't know if he's playing that badly but in comparative terms I think he's starting to look underwhelming compared to those playing number 10 type positions with our rivals. Players like Modric, Kagawa, Cazorla, Toure all seem to have composure or energy that Gerrard appears to be short on at the moment. Also when he has been asked to play in a deeper role I don't think that has suited him since he was a much younger man in a much different system, I sorta agree with Rafa that he is best not played as a deeper central midfielder because he's better utilised further forward and perhaps can't be trusted with the defensive responsibilities. He's also a victim of his own high standards.

I'm not sure if it's a fitness, age, loss of form or he's struggling with the new style of play and team mates but he's not making an impact and is guilty of losing possession a fair bit. I'm starting to think Gerrard could be tried as one of the front 3 where gambling to make a breakthrough is more acceptable or alternatively one of Lucas / Henderson need to play with Allen behind him. Things will start to improve though anyway once the team gets used to each other and the way we're playing.
 
I really don't think we can blame the system, but I do think we can blame where he is being played in that system. SG was kryptonite in the midfield last season too. We struggled in loads of games when he went in there. Our midfield was at its best last season at the beginning when he was injured and we had Lucas/ Adam/ Hendo/ Spearing occupying the midfield positions. As soon as SG was introduced, we struggled. We need to play him further forward.
 
I'm sure I read a stat that Gerrard has given the ball away more than any other player in the league. When the managers philosophy is based on possession, that's not gonna help.

Any other player and they'd have been dropped or subbed
 
I think Gerrard will be dropped after Man U if he doesnt show he can play in the system.

If Rodgers drops him on Sunday there will be bloodshed.
 
I'll be glad when he retires.

Cheers for being a legend Stevie, but you're done.

second thoughts?????

Stevie was excellent yesterday, his passing superb and what a great finish on the left foot.

Glad to have him back, I really like him allen and JonJo together
 
Pleased he did well

FFF has said it at length (and I concur), he can't play every game as he doesn't have the legs
 
second thoughts?????

Stevie was excellent yesterday, his passing superb and what a great finish on the left foot.

Glad to have him back, I really like him allen and JonJo together


Err, read the subsequent posts maybe? And maybe my MOTM post?

Of course I'm happy to see that kind of performance, I'd already said as much.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom