^^^ Would have been just easier to type "Yeah I got that one wrong" really.
Is it detailed objective analysis & data driven assessments that lead one to the term "flabby melt"?
Not really. I form opinions based on data and evidence. My view on Firmino was entirely correct; he didn't score enough goals.
However, like any rational, intelligent person, when the data-set changes, and suggests a different conclusion, it is entirely normal for that view to be revised.
Should Firmino's performances and effectiveness dip, and his crucial stats - scoring goals - change for the worse, I will again be entitled to use that in order to formulate a new conclusion.
This is quite normal for any kind of analytical process, and making glib, emotive statements about "right" or "wrong" has no value in an ongoing analysis in which observed results change.
Hopefully this should help clear up some confusion among our less bright posters who might be less used to dealing with empirical evidence when forming an opinion.
Jesus Christ.
Not really. I form opinions based on data and evidence. My view on Firmino was entirely correct; he didn't score enough goals.
However, like any rational, intelligent person, when the data-set changes, and suggests a different conclusion, it is entirely normal for that view to be revised.
Should Firmino's performances and effectiveness dip, and his crucial stats - scoring goals - change for the worse, I will again be entitled to use that in order to formulate a new conclusion.
This is quite normal for any kind of analytical process, and making glib, emotive statements about "right" or "wrong" has no value in an ongoing analysis in which observed results change.
Hopefully this should help clear up some confusion among our less bright posters who might be less used to dealing with empirical evidence when forming an opinion.
Again, it would be much easier to say " I was wrong".
Again, it would be much easier to say " I was wrong".
Heh, it's easier to post half arsed myopic nonsense than, say, actually address the points of a few lengthy, well constructed and thoroughly explained posts.
"We don't need more goals". Let's talk about this other great idea from last season, shall we?
Heh, it's easier to post half arsed myopic nonsense than, say, actually address the points of a few lengthy, well constructed and thoroughly explained posts.
"We don't need more goals". Let's talk about this other great idea from last season, shall we?
The thing is, its perfectly in its place for a half arsed mypopic nonsense respons, as thats all it deserves.
Brendan has been calling Firmino all sorts of names, claiming he's not good enough to start for us and that he shouldnt be our main "striker".
Now that everyone and his dog can see that he's one of the better forwards in the league, its suddenly only about the amount of goals he scored.
For some people it just seems like the worst possible outcome in this world if you have to admit that you were wrong.
Its dead funny.
The last part in your post is lost on me mate, sorry.
I'll simplify for you:
He scored 11 league goals last season, and 10 the season before - that's not good enough.
He's scored 1o league goals so far this season, and if he keeps up that level of finishing and ends up with 15-20 league goals - that will be good enough.
Hope this helps.
The brainfart is then that the one you allways cried out should play ahead of him scored 3 and 4 League goals the same seasons.
My main point was that we needed to buy a new striker, who could score 15-20 league goals a season.
If Firmino can do that regularly. and improve on his previous two seasons, that becomes less urgent, although given I don't rate Sturridge, Ings or Solanke, we need one anyway.
Again, it would be much easier to say " I was wrong".
Not really. I form opinions based on data and evidence. My view on Firmino was entirely correct; he didn't score enough goals.
However, like any rational, intelligent person, when the data-set changes, and suggests a different conclusion, it is entirely normal for that view to be revised.
Should Firmino's performances and effectiveness dip, and his crucial stats - scoring goals - change for the worse, I will again be entitled to use that in order to formulate a new conclusion.
This is quite normal for any kind of analytical process, and making glib, emotive statements about "right" or "wrong" has no value in an ongoing analysis in which observed results change.
Hopefully this should help clear up some confusion among our less bright posters who might be less used to dealing with empirical evidence when forming an opinion.
Nope. You said Sturridge was better, then changed your argument when others proved you wrong on that count.
A fit Sturridge is a better finisher and would play in any team.
Sadly, as I suspected, his injuries have taken a toll, so even if he is still good at finishing, he can't actually run anymore.
Studge goals over the years:
10/11 - 8 goals
11/12 - 11 goals
12/13 - 11 goals
13/14 - 21 goals
14/15 - 4 goals
15/16 - 8 goals
16/17 - 3 goals
17/18 - 2 goals
For a "prolific finisher" those stats says a lot about more than running.
Weird thread this. He's in great form and that's brilliant, we all love it. But if you think that justifies the forced, unworthy praise that somehow came his way when he didn't deserve it, you're wrong. He's been through spells where he's been shite. He's in ace form now, I doubt you'd find anyone who'd disagree. But this pathetic I told you so stuff is nauseating.
Bit like Can. Good game last weekend against City, how could we possibly let him go???? Erm, remember the completely ineffective games before last week.
Talk about kneejerk.
Firmino is in outstanding form right now. Long may it continue. Thing is, it might not. And then there'll be a thread on here about why we need an alternative to what he offers. Like there should be.
A fit Sturridge is a better finisher and would play in any team.
Sadly, as I suspected, his injuries have taken a toll, so even if he is still good at finishing, he can't actually run anymore.
Yeah, they also say "injuries"
Weird thread this. He's in great form and that's brilliant, we all love it. But if you think that justifies the forced, unworthy praise that somehow came his way when he didn't deserve it, you're wrong. He's been through spells where he's been shite. He's in ace form now, I doubt you'd find anyone who'd disagree. But this pathetic I told you so stuff is nauseating.
Bit like Can. Good game last weekend against City, how could we possibly let him go???? Erm, remember the completely ineffective games before last week.
Talk about kneejerk.
Firmino is in outstanding form right now. Long may it continue. Thing is, it might not. And then there'll be a thread on here about why we need an alternative to what he offers. Like there should be.