Would you swap..
- Thread starter Oncy
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Status
No chance, certainly not in the case of Hendo and Coutinho anyway, I think they're both much more consistent and effective players for us, than Ozil and Ramsay are for them. Kane looks the real deal, but Sturridge has done it over a longer period, tough one really, but I'd stick with Studge because with the right partner he's a much more classy player.
Sterling and Sanchez is a tough one, but Sterling could be as good as if not, better than Sanchez.
Sterling and Sanchez is a tough one, but Sterling could be as good as if not, better than Sanchez.
Its not that much longer though.. In this hypothetical land, i think i'd take Kane and i don't think Studge works as a lone striker as effectively as he does with a high energy strike partner.
I'd probably take Sanchez for Sterling too.
Sanchez over Sterling for sure
Some more then...
Balotelli or Welbeck?
Lallana or Cazorla?
Mignolet or any Arsenal keeper?
Some more then...
Balotelli or Welbeck?
Lallana or Cazorla?
Mignolet or any Arsenal keeper?
Only one would be sanchez for sterling. The rest hell the fuck no. Kane would slow down our play and doesn't have the trickery of sturridge. Sanchez has hard work and end product so he would be a worthwhile swap.
Coq .. he looks a very good player in the making and he's young.
Hendo / Ramsey. Ramsey is a class player, however he's made of glass. At his best I'd say he's closer to Coutinho than Hendo in his style of play. Close but I'd stick with Hendo.
Sterling - Sanchez. Here you would be gambling potential over the here and now, because as it stands Sanchez is the better player.
Coutinho - Ozil. No, Couts for me. He's already better with a much higher ceiling.
Sturridge - Kane. Another tough one. Of course Kane is on form but when both are at their best Sturridge is better. Studge.
Sterling - Sanchez. Here you would be gambling potential over the here and now, because as it stands Sanchez is the better player.
Coutinho - Ozil. No, Couts for me. He's already better with a much higher ceiling.
Sturridge - Kane. Another tough one. Of course Kane is on form but when both are at their best Sturridge is better. Studge.
You mention Ramsay is made of glass. Can you not say the same about Sturridge? That should come into the equation shouldnt it? Or is it one rule for one... 🙂
Jeez Pete. Answer is obvious. Liverpool players use Pilkington Glass not that brittle Southern shite.
Balotelli for Huntelaar
I wouldn't make any of those four swaps. Try it with City players:
Sterling for Aguero
Coutinho for Silva
Henderson for Fernandinho
Markovic for Navas
Can for Toure
Sterling for Aguero
Coutinho for Silva
Henderson for Fernandinho
Markovic for Navas
Can for Toure
I'd take Aguero out of those
Thanks interesting - I wonder if anyone is going to be swooping in for him. He has been the reason they've stayed competitive whilst Sanchez's form has dropped. Really classy player.
Considering a lot of people were reasonably happy with the idea of replacing Suarez with Sanchez, the idea of doing so with Sterling at this point is potentially a no brainer. It is still a gamble on talent and consistency.
No. I hope this helps.
You're missing out the small matter of £40m and the total lack of decent alternatives, though...
Sturridge for Kane a tough one?
Lets not be silly now...
Lets not be silly now...
- Status
