Why is everyone singling out Brendan Rodgers when there is a transfer committee?
In the absence of a director of football, Dave Fallows (head of recruitment), Barry Hunter (chief scout) and Michael Edwards (head of analysis) are also key figures when it comes to assessing targets for owners Fenway Sports Group.
But Rodgers says the work of that trio makes his life easier and the manager retains full control over any potential signings as he looks to strengthen his squad.
“There is absolutely no way a player will come in here if I don’t want him,” Rodgers said.
“I will always be the first person it comes to. That’s not being arrogant, that’s how we operate here and how it works in this country.
“Abroad it works differently where you have a coach and the club will bring in the players. The coach then works with the players he’s given.
“A lot has been made of it but the fact is the process that happens here is no different to what happens at other English clubs.
“We have a number of people, scouting staff and analysts, who will look for targets who fit the profile of the players that we want.
“Then I will sit down with those guys, look at those targets and make a shortlist from that.
“All that work that goes on is of great help to me. We identify players, gather all the information we possibly can and then if they’re right for what we need it comes down to whether they are affordable and available.
“I know the club will go and do the best it can to get the players we want. But it’s very clear that anyone we sign will be because I want him here.”
If we had great players clamouring to sign for us there'd be more question marks. But we clearly don't. So the market is a minefield for us anyway.
And loaning Cissokho when we have Robinson and Wisdom.
I'm not arsed who it's down to, we're just not very good at it. For a club with limited funds we aren't very savvy when it comes to transfers. We bought Borini for £10m, loan him out then buy the inferior Aspas for £7m. We sell Shelvey for £6m then buy a player of similar calibre, Alberto, for £8m. We buy Ilori for £7m when we've got a shed load of centre halves and then loan him out.
We take on Moses' wages when Sterling, Ibe or even Assaidi could do just as good a job. And don't get me started on the useless plank who played left back today. He should be paying us for getting a game.
Now we're doing it again. We don't need Salah, we need a top notch central midfielder and have done for fucking ages.
And I don't get the 'we send these kids on loan because they wouldn't get a chance here' argument. Yes they will get a chance, just like the shite like Moses, Aspas and Cissokho have.
When Mr Rodgers took over we were shit, losing loads of games and fighting to be top 8.
After all of his transfer dealings over the last 18months we are 50m net down (although arguably 20 to 30m would have been saved in wages on Aquilani, Carroll, Maxi, Aurelio, Downing, Adam etc) and we are fighting for top 4 again and 3 weeks ago people were still talking title.
Whats the fucking problem?
If he signs players I think are questionable and we keep winning and competing then fuck it.
I get the concern of course, but weve practically halfed the squad age and cleared a fuckload of deadwood and cut the wage bill. All these things needed doing. And if Borini, Alberto, Aspas, Illori, Sakho etc come good then we have done a bang up job.
I wouldnt write anyone off yet. Its too early.
And he signed Sturridge for 8m quid so for all his failures or percieved failures to date including sell on value hes well in the fucking green given Coutinho and Sturridge would go for about 60m the pair.
Im happy so far. My biggest gripe is seeing Borini and Assaidi go out on loan and Aspas and Moses come in. Its nonsensical.
But only viewing retrospectively.
Mr Rodgers is a o fucking k with me.
The crazy top 4 challenging bastard.
And Mr Rodgers stopped him leaving.
SKADOOOOOOSHHH!
Surely it obvious that loaning Robinson & Wisdom out was in order for them to get guaranteed playing time - which they weren't going to get at Liverpool.
Assaidi & Borrini also stood more chance of getting games while on loan.
I think, if he could, Ibe & Alberto would be off out on loan too.
I actually think Robinson would have gotten more games seeing that Enrique would be our only fit leftback. Robinson cant be any worse than Cissokho. Wisdom could provide cover at rightback while Johnson switched to leftback.
And Mr Rodgers stopped him leaving.
SKADOOOOOOSHHH!
Don't like a mere semantic like that change things though. A month ago we were top of the league after having aspirations of climbing up the league a few places to signify progress. Now it's all doom and fucking gloom again and people are posting the same old shite. "Rodgers hasn't done much after all..." oh, really. Remind me where we finished with Suarez last time? Oh. So adding Sturridge and Coutinho and co has helped us push above and beyond, but we can safely say that it's more or less solely down to Suarez still.
It's great being the level headed cynic'n'all, but you know..
Aspas served his purpose for the 6 games we didn't have Suarez. He had to try and spend a decent amount on someone because a youth player just wouldn't have cut it. No harm was done and it was probably always the intention to sell him again afterwards.
So you're not actually wasting 7m on him. The truth is 7m was probably all he had available in the budget, so he spent all of it to get the best replacement he could afford, and in the knowledge he'd recoup the 7m later.
I am not sure if I agree with the argument that signings can be rated OK if their original or significant portion of their transfer price is recoupable. Of course it is better than the Aquilani or Caroll case where we lost a significant chunk but still it does not make the case where we can get back the original transfer fee an OK scenario. Every crap signing we make, we are missing the opportunity to improve the squad and the first team. Also the wages of players have become so significant that every wrong transfer, even a wrong loan signing can affect us financially. Aquilani will be an absolute shit signing even if some Seria A club paid us 20 million to take him back. Same with Aspas. If he continues to play the same way, he will be a shit signing irrespective of whether a La liga club pays us 2,3,5,7 million. What they cost us is far more valuable than the difference between purchase and sale price.
Not a criticism of Rodgers or Rafa, btw . This is a critique of the entire LFC scouting operation. I don’t think “gets rid of shit signings really fast” or “shit signings don’t cost that much” is a virtue. I know it is unrealistic to expect every signing to contribute significantly but we need to improve our scouting to the level where a majority of them contribute immediately or within a period of one or two years.
Some sort if loan signing would have been better than shelling out £7m on a player not up to it.
Or maybe just using Borini instead - a player he already had.
Oh I agree with you there. I was just saying Aspas was an exceptional case. We lost Suarez for 6 games. We're hardly going to replace him with a new long-term player over a poxy 6 game ban. But Rodgers still had a problem with what to do in those 6 games. He must have had 7 million spare change that he could afford to commit for a year, and spent that on getting Aspas.
Granted he is not a good player, but also 7m is about a fair price for him given his form at the time. We were better off doing the deal, rather than having 7 million sat doing nothing on our balance sheet and partnering Sturridge with Adam fucking Morgan for 6 games.
Once we sell him for 6 million or whatever in the summer, we can then use that to help get a player we genuinely want to have in the team.