• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Patience Pact

Status
Not open for further replies.
Anyone expecting more than 6 points from our first 5 games is asking for a hell of alot from the new system.

Personally even if we lose all 5 I won't be panicing. It's a nightmare start for us.
 
So argue the post or dont post anything at all.

If you REALLY think it is trolling, ignore it.

Why throw abuse at the poster?

Is that really too difficult........

You're not really reading anything Mark says ... there's a difference between trolling and negative posts (like many people last year when they realized Daglish was gone, or realized he wasn't going to cut it etc).

Here's an example with me; Trolling (acting like a "oh shit, LFC has ended b/c Daglish has been fired" over the course of some thread where I was just acting a cock) vs negative posts (in a similar thread, I explained what worried me etc). Another example with Gkmacca - he's made harsh comments about Rodgers wrt Carroll. Now he's explain his position well enough numerous times, so no one thinks he's 'trolling.' It's a valid opinion and probably in the minority (currently - that may shift).

Last year, you were trolling most of the time ... I don't believe you'll do it this year because a) Daglish is gone and b) you seem to have an inkling (?) of faith in Rodgers doing something over the next 3 years. Oh well, just try ... I believe you can do it.
 
I just think you make a big issue about posters comments if they're in any way negative and it's a bit uncalled for imo.

Apart from that, i enjoy reading your posts(i'm sure that'll mean alot to you).

Why do people struggle to differentiate between trolling and negative posts? No one bothers Dreamy and he's more negative (most of the time) than Ryan and co combined? Maybe it's cuz it's Pat and we love him, but I believe we love Mr. Moo, Ryan, Modo & Hmmmmmm too.
 
If we were playing great football and were a successful team and I was posting what I sometimes do, then rightly that could be seen as trolling.

However we have playing shite and wasting money on awful players.

Anyway Ryan pretty much nailed this thread on general.

I suggested a truce where posters are not abused and only the posts are replied to.

Is that unreasonable?

He is unwillingly to do this, if you agree with this lock this thread and move on, as we are going round in circles.

P.s A poster was banned for abusing a mod? Mods never do the same when posters are swearing at each other.

Double standards?



You're not really reading anything Mark says ... there's a difference between trolling and negative posts (like many people last year when they realized Daglish was gone, or realized he wasn't going to cut it etc).

Here's an example with me; Trolling (acting like a "oh shit, LFC has ended b/c Daglish has been fired" over the course of some thread where I was just acting a cock) vs negative posts (in a similar thread, I explained what worried me etc). Another example with Gkmacca - he's made harsh comments about Rodgers wrt Carroll. Now he's explain his position well enough numerous times, so no one thinks he's 'trolling.' It's a valid opinion and probably in the minority (currently - that may shift).

Last year, you were trolling most of the time ... I don't believe you'll do it this year because a) Daglish is gone and b) you seem to have an inkling (?) of faith in Rodgers doing something over the next 3 years. Oh well, just try ... I believe you can do it.
 
This is it though, the season hasn't started, the transfer window hasn't closed yet we've seen it kick off already.

"However we have been playing shite and wasting money on awful players", are you still laying into us now over last years failings, or are you gonna give us an ounce of faith and support?

And just for the record, if you read past Ryan's first post in the thread, he didn't nail it at all. He posted from your viewpoint that people should be able to post as much negative guff as they like. Sharing your view doesn't automatically mean he's right, he missed the point completely. As have you, again.
 
The highlighted point explained why negative posts were made in the past.

Even you posted last week how much we needed new signings.

If me or modo had posted the same we would have been called out for that, as gary25 has pointed out to you.

Hence my post earlier about replying to the post and not posters, which you (or the mods?) are unable to agree to do.

That for me is the crux of the issue.


This is it though, the season hasn't started, the transfer window hasn't closed yet we've seen it kick off already.

"However we have been playing shite and wasting money on awful players", are you still laying into us now over last years failings, or are you gonna give us an ounce of faith and support?

And just for the record, if you read past Ryan's first post in the thread, he didn't nail it at all. He posted from your viewpoint that people should be able to post as much negative guff as they like. Sharing your view doesn't automatically mean he's right, he missed the point completely. As have you, again.
 
I give up, it's pretty clear you don't grasp any of this. I'll explain my post last week one more time, given my explanation then was seemingly overlooked. I was getting impatient, by my standards in the first week in August, that's slightly different to kicking off everyday about a lack of activity and whatever other aspect I find negative, even more importantly, it's not like I was doing it in June like a few idiots were. There lies the difference. I post one negative point and you lot can't wait to jump in, proving nothing other than the fact that you just don't 'get' it. Negative, explained posts are fine, being a miserable doom monger posting the same point time and time again is fucking annoying, I can't put it any more black & white for you (would you like me to draw a picture?).

Good luck with keeping a lid on your vents over the next few weeks, like I said, you're clearly struggling to grasp the point that practically everyone bar yourself can see, so there's no point continuing to bang my head against a brick wall. It's fairly obvious you're intent on being a moaning twat, so that's pretty much point proven.

Go ahead and enjoy, knock yourself out, as you clearly fucking revel in it.
 
If we were playing great football and were a successful team and I was posting what I sometimes do, then rightly that could be seen as trolling.

However we have playing shite and wasting money on awful players.

Anyway Ryan pretty much nailed this thread on general.

I suggested a truce where posters are not abused and only the posts are replied to.

Is that unreasonable?

He is unwillingly to do this, if you agree with this lock this thread and move on, as we are going round in circles.

P.s A poster was banned for abusing a mod? Mods never do the same when posters are swearing at each other.

Double standards?

Wrt your last paragraph - if you're unhappy, leave. That's not why Skully was banned - It's rather obvious if you read the thread in the GC that Ryan chatted.

As with Mark however, you're ignoring what I'm writing too in an attempt to frame yourself as a poster who posted articulate arguments as to why Kenny was wrong for the job. You weren't. Truce? I think most posters here get given the benefit of the doubt more often than not, but as I said to you last time (which you probably ignored top), you got yourself a 'rep' based on last season ... Reps can change though, and you seem to be eager to be more patient and respectful. Good luck.
 
Eager to be more patient and respectful? Are you have a laugh LTW, have you read his recent posts?
 
Attack the post not the poster.

Is that unreasonable?

Wrt your last paragraph - if you're unhappy, leave. That's not why Skully was banned - It's rather obvious if you read the thread in the GC that Ryan chatted.

As with Mark however, you're ignoring what I'm writing too in an attempt to frame yourself as a poster who posted articulate arguments as to why Kenny was wrong for the job. You weren't. Truce? I think most posters here get given the benefit of the doubt more often than not, but as I said to you last time (which you probably ignored top), you got yourself a 'rep' based on last season ... Reps can change though, and you seem to be eager to be more patient and respectful. Good luck.
 
Like I said, I give up. Is it unreasonable for you to take a step back and consider what alot of people have been saying? You've made no attempt to do that but instead have continued to try to justify the way you post, is THAT unreasonable? Is it unreasonable to expect you to stop littering threads with the same one sentence jibe? Clearly it's too much to ask.

So don't expect the flack to stop, because it won't. If you're going to act like a cunt, you're going to get treated like one. Tough shit.
 
You're content to tell everyone to attack the post not the poster, while you continue to act the WUM and expect to get away with it.
 
You're pushing it mate ...

We used to have a poster who always put the quotes beneath his response ... Anyone remember his/her name?

Again, you duck the question.

Mark has at least answered.

A simply ** yes** or **no** would suffice.

I can assure I am not a reincarnation of anybody else preciously on this site.
 
Mods these three have hijacked my attempt at "serenity now" - please sanction accordingly
 
Again, you duck the question.

Mark has at least answered.

A simply ** yes** or **no** would suffice.

I can assure I am not a reincarnation of anybody else preciously on this site.

Mate, you're being a classic WUM. I didn't attack you in my post, which you quoted, I just explained my position. You ignored it. I get it, you were just negative yaddi yadda yadda. Have a great day & week.

Oh well, someone else used to do that all the time - I guess coincidence.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom