Its not going to help his betOnly half time.
Its not going to help his betOnly half time.
Young doesn’t go down. He dives like an Olympic atlethe from 10m in the Sydney pool.
That tug of the shirt doesn’t warrant that dive.
Good to see they overturn blatant diving.
Get it out of the sport.
Sorry but that's completely irrelevant. This is exactly where these discussions go off the rails. A tug of the shirt is a foul and because it happened inside the area a penalty should have been awarded. The whole idea of "not enough for a foul" is total nonsense.
I was talking about the Palace game.NOTHING HAPPENING
Has the Smith fight started?Switched over to the boxing, football's boring.
No not yet.Has the Smith fight started?
CheersNo not yet.
The ref really tried to help Arsenal here.Fuck off ref.
Completely agree but the new ruling that the holding has to be 'sustained' needlessly muddies the waters in both the decision making and the discussions.
For me it's a foul all day, but PGMOL love to overcomplicate things
Chelsea to hit some form and beat Arsenal whilst we win the Rumbelows trophy.Do we want a Villa or Chelsea win?
Do we want a Villa or Chelsea win?
Think they will both finish top 5.Villa. Hate for Chelsea and City to both finish top 4.
Kudus is fucking lazy, but when on the ball he's a nightmare.
Don't think anyone has been able to take the ball off him. He's bullied Arsenal today.
Him and Isak would be a good summer window.
It wouldn't be the PGMOL if there wasn't some unnecessary over complication of a simple ruleCompletely agree but the new ruling that the holding has to be 'sustained' needlessly muddies the waters in both the decision making and the discussions.
For me it's a foul all day, but PGMOL love to overcomplicate things
This is exactly it. He reminds me of shaqiri in the sense he'll either be unplayable or invisibleIsak yes for sure, but I wouldn't want Kudus. For all his strengths (and they're considerable at his best) we'd never know what to expect from him.
I just wonder what he would look like in a better team when he's not expected to defend for 80% of the game.Isak yes for sure, but I wouldn't want Kudus. For all his strengths (and they're considerable at his best) we'd never know what to expect from him.