Assuming we're not on drugs, yeahAnd still should, they ARE cheating cunts and we’re beating them through sheer hard work and graft.
Assuming we're not on drugs, yeahAnd still should, they ARE cheating cunts and we’re beating them through sheer hard work and graft.
We used to discuss FFP quite a lot
More fume
alexmcity
I'd like to explain to the Liverpool fans on here why we are reluctant to give their team credit.
First, the playing field hasn't been level wrt refereeing decisions. City haven't had any favourable decisions prior to the last 1-2 games, Liverpool have had several such decisions influencing the final results of some games. Had the playing field been level you would have been 8-9 pts clear and not 14 with a game in hand. In other words, knowing what happened last season, and that Laporte and Sane will be back soon, we would have stood a chance to win the league again.
Second, the playing field hasn't been level wrt the fixtures schedule. The Christmas schedule was blatantly weighted in Liverpool's favour.
Third, the media is full with Liverpool supporters who have been reluctant to give creidt to City. Some journos have gone to great lengths to criticise the club, its owners, etc.
Fourth, it's a myth that Liverpool fans were giving credit to City during the last two seasons. They were/are constantly talking about us being financially doped by human rights abusers etc.
Fifth, the attack on the coach was infuriating and your club and the local authorities did feck all to identify and punish the attackers.
Last edited: Today at 7:57 PM
Today at 7:27 PM
Fourth, it's a myth that Liverpool fans were giving credit to City during the last two seasons. They were/are constantly talking about us being financially doped by human rights abusers etc.
To be honest, should thank city for creating the current Liverpool. Never would have as a fan thought at any point we would have got 97 points and CL in the bag without even mentioning this season. Their constant whining fans, FFP breaking and money laundry spending help mound this current lot.
They should take a bow because without them 90pts would be more than enough in most seasons but they forced us to a whole new level.
They left last season thinking this lot pushed every last inch they got and gave everything but still finished sort by a point. They ain’t gonna come back from that with loser Klopp.
Yet went to Madrid, won the biggest cup in football and started the season with the risky strategy of pushing back 4 further. Shows the mentality of the lot to focus what’s needed to win the league rather than look at 97pts as the most you can do.
Like the rest of the teams like united and City, without focusing on what they can learn from us, they complained of luck, injuries VAR evening things. If they take a step back for a moment look like Chris Wilder, they may improve but instead choose to be bitter around trivial rivalry. Even better for us...
Rubbish, if it’s purely related to that thenThis is worthy of the Fume itself.
It's risible to talk about 'taking a step back' like Chris Wilder, when they've won the title four times in the past 6 seasons. They have nothing to be bitter about
To be fair, he got numbers three, four, and five spot on.
More fume
alexmcity
I'd like to explain to the Liverpool fans on here why we are reluctant to give their team credit.
First, the playing field hasn't been level wrt refereeing decisions. City haven't had any favourable decisions prior to the last 1-2 games, Liverpool have had several such decisions influencing the final results of some games. Had the playing field been level you would have been 8-9 pts clear and not 14 with a game in hand. In other words, knowing what happened last season, and that Laporte and Sane will be back soon, we would have stood a chance to win the league again.
Second, the playing field hasn't been level wrt the fixtures schedule. The Christmas schedule was blatantly weighted in Liverpool's favour.
Third, the media is full with Liverpool supporters who have been reluctant to give creidt to City. Some journos have gone to great lengths to criticise the club, its owners, etc.
Fourth, it's a myth that Liverpool fans were giving credit to City during the last two seasons. They were/are constantly talking about us being financially doped by human rights abusers etc.
Fifth, the attack on the coach was infuriating and your club and the local authorities did feck all to identify and punish the attackers.
Last edited: Today at 7:57 PM
Today at 7:27 PM
I don't agree with number 3. To a certain extent number 4 too. People did talk about FFP etc. but at least on here people recognised how good City were.
Bollocks. Carragher, Souness, Owen, Hansen, Redknapp, McAteer, Nicol all Liverpool players and pundits in the media favor Liverpool.I don't agree with number 3. To a certain extent number 4 too. People did talk about FFP etc. but at least on here people recognised how good City were.
We attacked their coach and the police did nothing.
Bollocks. Carragher, Souness, Owen, Hansen, Redknapp, McAteer, Nicol all Liverpool players and pundits in the media favor Liverpool.
We chatted shit about FFP all year they were crushing it.
We attacked their coach and the police did nothing.
As a Liverpool fan I don’t give a fuck about any of it. But to deny it is stupid.
Bollocks. Carragher, Souness, Owen, Hansen, Redknapp, McAteer, Nicol all Liverpool players and pundits in the media favor Liverpool.
We chatted shit about FFP all year they were crushing it.
We attacked their coach and the police did nothing.
As a Liverpool fan I don’t give a fuck about any of it. But to deny it is stupid.
Bollocks. Carragher, Souness, Owen, Hansen, Redknapp, McAteer, Nicol all Liverpool players and pundits in the media favor Liverpool.
We chatted shit about FFP all year they were crushing it.
We attacked their coach and the police did nothing.
As a Liverpool fan I don’t give a fuck about any of it. But to deny it is stupid.
Is it really just my bias or are we actually much easier to like?
Again, could be bias, but I always felt Arse's invincibles were media darlings not just because they were great to watch but also because their direct competition were a bunch of cunts.
A Liverpool connection (which those guys obv.have) doesn't automatically mean pro-LFC bias. For that charge to stick there would have to be an excess of pro-LFC comment in what they say which was undeserved by what they were actually commenting on. I don't see or hear that from any of them that I can think of.
Yes, I suppose there is often an extreme negativity with LFC fans as pundits, when things aren't going well.
And some are just weirdly bitter and negative when proffered any opportunity to be so, cf Ray Houghton, Ronnie Whelan and Steve Nicol
Nah I've seen a lot of Nicol this season (and last) and he is reservedly pro-Liverpool he just doesn't want to go overboard but quite clearly it's there.Yes, I suppose there is often an extreme negativity with LFC fans as pundits, when things aren't going well.
And some are just weirdly bitter and negative when proffered any opportunity to be so, cf Ray Houghton, Ronnie Whelan and Steve Nicol
Owen has been eulogising us all this season !Ian St. John was very negative about the club after Roy Evans was eventually eased out. Also little Michael Owen never shows any signs of feeling any warmth towards the club where he made his name.