We should do away with VAR and implement a system like the player challenge system in tennis.
Let the managers make the decision to ask the ref to review incidents on screen and the managers can only do this three times per match
I said in another thread. There needs to be a team of 3 on subjective decisions. Current referees alone have each others backs too much.
For all matter of fact decisions. Keep with the current pool of referees.
For subjective decisions, the team of 3 made up from
- a current referee
- a former referee
- a former professional player
Have a timer of 45 seconds from first available replay to the team.
If 1 out of 3 say warrants the referee to overturn. Then stick with the onfield decision.
If 2 out of 3 say warrants the referee to overturn, then the referee is called to a pitch side monitor to have a second look. The referee should be entitled to decline the advice though if he feels he had a better angle than the replay available.
If 3 out of 3 say warrants the referee to overturn, then this is clearly an obvious error. It shouldn't be referred to a pitch side monitor, it should be directly communicated to the referee and the stadium of the decision.
This would bring some sort of consistency to VAR.