I like Nunez, but I still think we should have spent that money better. I would have spread that money across two signings.
But one thing you cannot accuse the lad of is lack of unpredictability. When he is on the pitch, something always happens. He has this overwhelming desire to put a ball into the net and take the shortest route to achieve it as possible, which is a bit endearing. And he plays the game at 100 mph.
He does look like a square peg in a round hole in our attack. But I think this is a deliberate move by Klopp and the management team to take our attack in a different direction. Mane, Salah, and Firmino are very unique three. The chances of us finding another unselfish, hard-working, attacker with flair like Mane and especially Firmino is low. Nunez for all his flaws brings a physicality upfront that the others didn't have.
I agree with everything here bar the first sentence.
Firstly Nunez's transfer cost around £65m, if we eventually have to pay the full whack (£85m?) then he'll have proved his worth. So compare that to what we could have got for 2 x 32m in this market. Here's a list of players fees (21/22 and 22/23) that gives an idea of what decent players cost (listed in € on Transfermarkt and above 30m) :
White €59m, Willock €30m, Buendia €39m, Baily €32m, Lukaku €113m, Abraham €40m, Digne €30m, James €29m, Daka €30m, Konate €40m, Diaz €47m, Grealish €118m, Torres €55m, Guimares €42m, Wood €30m, Ings €30m, Zouma €35m, Vlasic €30m, Jesus €52m, Viera €35m, Zinchenko €35m, Carlos €32m, Cucurella €65m, Fofana €80m, Onana €35m, Richarlison €58m, Aaronson €33m, Raphina €58m, Philips €49m, Sterling €56m, Antony €95m, Casemiro €71m , Martinez €58m , Isak €70m, Botman €37m, Romero €50m, Bergwijn €31m, Paqueta €43m, Scamacca €36m, Aguerd €35m, Nunes €45m and Guedes €33m.
I've left Haaland off the list simply because his transfer fee was actually just one small part of a huge total cost.
When bearing in mind that top strikers cost more, sometimes a lot more, than any other position where is the value listed above? You could gamble on virtual unknowns (which is what mid-table clubs do, sometimes it pays off most often it doesn't), pay stratospheric fees & wages for established top strikers (Haaland, Kane, Lewandowski etc.) or go for high scoring young players with potential (Nunez). We can't afford to take a wild gamble, wait for top young strikers to establish themselves or to pay for an established top striker. Even the likes of Bowen would be well north of £50m (on Teamtalk they claim West Ham want over £75m).
What is most clear though is that there is no way we could have brought in two £32m players without taking a huge gamble, on both. There is no certainty of any kind in that price bracket. I'm very happy with the purchase of Nunez, I don't feel his fee is extravagant for what we have and he certainly has a very high ceiling that hopefully we can help him reach.