Seems to me, after some coffer filling deals in the past few years, Brighton have decided they are all in. Buy 5, 6, 7 or 8 players at very decent lowish prices and hopefully sell on 2-3 of them at prices which will cover the lot or more.
Liverpool related transfer speculation
- Thread starter dee
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
-
- Tags
- liverpool
vs. Ali? 😂😂😂
They aren't really low though, range from 20-40m and spent effectively their profit over the last few years in one summer. Bit of a gamble but then Bloom is a high stakes poker player.
Succsessor!
Well until that's proven then the market has dictated the price
Ramsdale went for 18 mill (could be 25). Johnstone went for 10 mill.
25 mill is about right.
We'd probably accept 18-20 mill plus add ons.
With Ramsdale it's about reputation and it's still intact. Hence the fee.
Reputation of being relegated twice I agree
Unproven at this time in the eyes of legality. At the moment it's legally the case Newcastle wanted to buy forests shit 4th choice 30+year old keeper for 20m
If Onana went to the Mancs for Euro 51m then Kelleher's worth that at least.
You can't use the Mancs as a barometer for prices. They paid €90m for Antony, £55m for Mount and €75m for Hojland. Considering the only offer we've had was from Forest which was £7m plus a stale piece of bread, I doubt anyone else is as stupid as the Reds(Man U).
There is no going anywhere now and in the Winter he can ask for a loan deal if no offer comes
Yes Newcastle spent 20m on Vlachodimos
& yes Utd spent 47m on Onana
But also;
Wolves spent 10m on Johnstone
Ipswich spent 8m on Muric
Spurs spent 17m on Vicario
Brighton spent 16m on Vergbruggen
Brentford spent 11m on Flekken
Bournemouth got in Neto on a free to be their #1 for 2 seasons.
Keepers around Europe are going for similiar.
So where do you draw the line? The fee is going to vary by club isn't it........we can't expect a Brentford, Palace or Bournemouth for example to pay what Newcastle/Chelsea/Utd are for their keepers.
& yes Utd spent 47m on Onana
But also;
Wolves spent 10m on Johnstone
Ipswich spent 8m on Muric
Spurs spent 17m on Vicario
Brighton spent 16m on Vergbruggen
Brentford spent 11m on Flekken
Bournemouth got in Neto on a free to be their #1 for 2 seasons.
Keepers around Europe are going for similiar.
So where do you draw the line? The fee is going to vary by club isn't it........we can't expect a Brentford, Palace or Bournemouth for example to pay what Newcastle/Chelsea/Utd are for their keepers.
He was great on my FIFA save last year, that's the only value I can add
Yeah, the more I hear of things like this I really do wonder...Everyone knows the coach sees DM as priority, but when the key position cannot be filled with our number one target ... we do copium by buying an attacker.
So I wonder if this is actual sexism. If it was the Dad, would they care? Just brush it off?
I don’t think so. Had it been the Da the same thing would’ve happened.
Cancel the signing? ya think. Hmmm
Absolutely. Thats one of the things a team should be looking at. The entourage around a player can really fuck things up.
Tis true. But is the Mum an entourage? Or just an advocating agent?
Even if it’s one person, would you employ a person who would bring someone along to try and dictate your job to you? Plus all the other shit they’d bring?
Absolutely not. I’d only expect it at contract negotiations time. But trying to tell you how to run your team? I’d chase them out the building.
Probably lost it when she said he needs a titty suck break every 15-20 minutes
Similar threads
- Locked
-
- Locked
-
- Locked
