We’re gonna do the quad
Thiago did his
We’re gonna do the quad
I love that all these 'sell him', 'move him on' 'he's shit' (yes there are some) posters are utterly utterly silent.
*listens, hears a pin drop*
If Klopp has a fault, it's that he taxes the hell out of his players' bodies and doesn't always know/care if they have the durability for it or not. He may not of thought of it as one, but it always was one to me.He’s not a luxury signing though. Klopp doesnt make those.
He’s not a luxury signing though. Klopp doesnt make those.
Lol, dude... just cause you don't understand the position we had doesn't mean you should simplify it down to "he's shit".
He is a luxury player that raises the ceiling of your team not the floor. He can be exposed in the wrong setup... would he be able to dominate the PL without Virgil, Fabinho and Matip all at the peak of their powers... Not in the same way as he has deficiencies to his game. He needs to be accommodated. I still would have kept Gini over Thiago. Because Thiago gets injured and Gini doesn't. In addition, Thiago effects the whole style of play more, meaning when we miss him we have to change our style more. Similar to Trent, so the fact he gets injured so often is a problem... We look extra not creative when he isn't around as we get dependent on him.
Thiago is a boss player... but he wasn't right for us and even though he will make us a much better side when he is part of it and we have a good base outside of him... I would choose for Liverpool, who don't spend as much as its competitors, to have a player who always plays almost every game and shows up in the biggest of games, rather than an absolute rockstar, who dominates a lot of games he plays but can never be relied on fully...
I was quiet about Thiago cause I don't like bashing Liverpool players. I try never to unless they are just painfully below standard... Thiago was and never was going to be that... But he is a puzzle piece with a weird shape... But the current best 11 of Liverpool could fit almost any puzzle piece in it. When we were first having this discussion... he didn't fit into that Liverpool's best side due to an injury crisis to the base he needs to perform on.
A lot of this is true, I have to say.Lol, dude... just cause you don't understand the position we had doesn't mean you should simplify it down to "he's shit".
He is a luxury player that raises the ceiling of your team not the floor. He can be exposed in the wrong setup... would he be able to dominate the PL without Virgil, Fabinho and Matip all at the peak of their powers... Not in the same way as he has deficiencies to his game. He needs to be accommodated. I still would have kept Gini over Thiago. Because Thiago gets injured and Gini doesn't. In addition, Thiago effects the whole style of play more, meaning when we miss him we have to change our style more. Similar to Trent, so the fact he gets injured so often is a problem... We look extra not creative when he isn't around as we get dependent on him.
Thiago is a boss player... but he wasn't right for us and even though he will make us a much better side when he is part of it and we have a good base outside of him... I would choose for Liverpool, who don't spend as much as its competitors, to have a player who always plays almost every game and shows up in the biggest of games, rather than an absolute rockstar, who dominates a lot of games he plays but can never be relied on fully...
I was quiet about Thiago cause I don't like bashing Liverpool players. I try never to unless they are just painfully below standard... Thiago was and never was going to be that... But he is a puzzle piece with a weird shape... But the current best 11 of Liverpool could fit almost any puzzle piece in it. When we were first having this discussion... he didn't fit into that Liverpool's best side due to an injury crisis to the base he needs to perform on.
The answer to all that is ridiculously simple : Klopp. I think he knows a helluva lot more about tactics and how a player would or wouldn't fit in to our team.Lol, dude... just cause you don't understand the position we had doesn't mean you should simplify it down to "he's shit".
He is a luxury player that raises the ceiling of your team not the floor. He can be exposed in the wrong setup... would he be able to dominate the PL without Virgil, Fabinho and Matip all at the peak of their powers... Not in the same way as he has deficiencies to his game. He needs to be accommodated. I still would have kept Gini over Thiago. Because Thiago gets injured and Gini doesn't. In addition, Thiago effects the whole style of play more, meaning when we miss him we have to change our style more. Similar to Trent, so the fact he gets injured so often is a problem... We look extra not creative when he isn't around as we get dependent on him.
Thiago is a boss player... but he wasn't right for us and even though he will make us a much better side when he is part of it and we have a good base outside of him... I would choose for Liverpool, who don't spend as much as its competitors, to have a player who always plays almost every game and shows up in the biggest of games, rather than an absolute rockstar, who dominates a lot of games he plays but can never be relied on fully...
I was quiet about Thiago cause I don't like bashing Liverpool players. I try never to unless they are just painfully below standard... Thiago was and never was going to be that... But he is a puzzle piece with a weird shape... But the current best 11 of Liverpool could fit almost any puzzle piece in it. When we were first having this discussion... he didn't fit into that Liverpool's best side due to an injury crisis to the base he needs to perform on.
LOLZLolz
The answer to all that is ridiculously simple : Klopp. I think he knows a helluva lot more about tactics and how a player would or wouldn't fit in to our team.
Adapting physically to the PL and staying fit are other questions but your tactical assessment is a road crash.
The fact you'd prefer a water carrier well past his best, and that Klopp was happy with letting go, just because he is rarely injured, over one of the world's best midfielders says a lot.
I wonder how we would be doing this season with a misfortune of Fans, Hendo and Gini. I'd speculate nowhere near as well.
To be fair, he's had more successes than not. Keita should have worked (and still may); ox was a weird one that paid dividends once or twice.I love the "the manager clearly knows better so shut up"
The manager also spunked the guts of 100m on Ox and Keita.
I could have been convinced on a Gini replacement easily. Or any boss or close to midfielder with a great injury record considering how little we spent that summer. Thiago was cheap, known to do the business but also known to be very familiar with the treatment table for both consistent and serious events.The answer to all that is ridiculously simple : Klopp. I think he knows a helluva lot more about tactics and how a player would or wouldn't fit in to our team.
Adapting physically to the PL and staying fit are other questions but your tactical assessment is a road crash.
The fact you'd prefer a water carrier well past his best, and that Klopp was happy with letting go, just because he is rarely injured, over one of the world's best midfielders says a lot.
I wonder how we would be doing this season with a misfortune of Fans, Hendo and Gini. I'd speculate nowhere near as well.
I love the "the manager clearly knows better so shut up"
The manager also spunked the guts of 100m on Ox and Keita.
18 wins out of 19 when paired with Fabs begs to differ. In fact you only have to go to the rags and TV commentators to hear them raving about his performances for endorsement.Re:thiago however, I don't think thiago has been instrumental to our success this season at all, so thats just hyping him up for little reason
You've actually just stated the point I was going to make ... no top player is easily replaceable and almost always teams need to adapt as best they can to that loss. Does that mean you don't buy/play them ? Of course not. When Messi, Ronaldo, Mo, Lewandowski etc. (you get the point) are out then there is never a ready made replacement and tactics change. I was going to say Mo, TAA, Firmino, Fabs for us. We change formations and tactics. However I'd rather have a top quality player that takes us to the next level for half the season and have to adapt when he's absent, than settle for mediocrity because it's expedient. That next level may be just what's needed to get us over the line in the PL or CL.And I was going to make this point a couple weeks ago when he was bossing it and I was just starting to get back into football... as we were having to be careful with his minutes and we don't look right when he is out, like our style isn't fully ours as much; Trent, VVD, Salah style.
But I just haven't posted in a very long time. I had stopped following everything for a little while...
It's been looking boss of late : Fabs, Hendo, Thiago, Elliott, Keita, Jones, Milner Ox. etc. a lot of options to cover 4 competitions."our midfield is in dire straits" .... ok
So why aren't we saying fabs is intrumental to our success? Why is it only thiago getting this praise?18 wins out of 19 when paired with Fabs begs to differ. In fact you only have to go to the rags and TV commentators to hear them raving about his performances for endorsement.
So why aren't we saying fabs is intrumental to our success? Why is it only thiago getting this praise?
This is why i don't think he's instrumental to how we play. He offers a very nice and very important change in midfield tempo which we need; but it's not like we struggled without him for years.Because everyone knows Fabinho is brilliant.
Only the same few gobshites need to overegg Thiago not being completely shit.
Seriously ! Have you not watched any of our games this season? Our midfield is fucking ace. Yes we've had the odd injury but bloody nora do I actually have to list our achievements so far for people to stop with this ridiculousness ? 7/7 in the CL, LC winners, FAC ongoing, PL challenging City for the title. The facts speak for themselves - we are not in a dire state anywhere on the pitch. Will we need to invest in the Summer? Yes because I believe Ox will go but with Millie saying (or maybe it was Klopp) that he'll be given another 1 year contract that leaves one slot open.I could have been convinced on a Gini replacement easily. Or any boss or close to midfielder with a great injury record considering how little we spent that summer. Thiago was cheap, known to do the business but also known to be very familiar with the treatment table for both consistent and serious events.
It was meant to be Keita by that point who replaced Gini, he does a lot of what Gini did for us minus the physicality plus a few other things. But by then we had already realized he was injury prone. After buying Chamberlain. So yeah, we have put our midfield in a dire state of having all injury prone, older or very young players minus Fabinho?? We will probably win our way out of it because of how great Klopp is as a manager and the phenomenal business we've done everywhere else on the pitch. But we've built a very injury prone or inexperienced midfield... and ability is probably the 4-5th most important ability.