Which was the underlying reason we lost the title.. His tactical nouse in setting up a team to defend, just wasn't all that..
Football was great.. Sensational at times, but you where never gong to win a league title conceding 50 goals +.. It is incredibly Nieve for anyone to think so... Our attacking threat papered over the cracks..
So when the attacking threat was all but diminished the following season.. The real problem in Rodgers reign was heavily exposed...
Like Modo's posts, that's a considerable oversimplification. We very nearly did win a league title conceding that many goals, and what's really naïve is imagining we could have got ourselves into that position by the efforts of two or three players alone. Rodgers did not get the defence right in the end, but throughout the season other teams tried all sorts to stop us and he kept finding ways to get around their various strategies. Was he the finished article tactically? No. But was he "tactically inept" all season every season? No again.