Mark Lawerenson
[article=http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/mark-lawrenson-im-worried-liverpool-9725565]One player I doubt we’ll see in the starting line-up at the Britannia Stadium is Divock Origi.
I don’t see him as an out-and-out striker, at least not yet. He’s still young and you can tell he is very much learning his trade.
When everybody is fit, in the first few months I’d imagine Origi will be mainly used as a substitute to stretch teams when coming on late on.
He loves the ball in front of him. He doesn’t like it being played up to him. His movement isn’t great in the box.
I’m not saying Origi is a bad buy, far from it. He’s still a kid.
And with Danny Ings and Christian Benteke also coming in, there will be no great pressure on Origi to deliver immediately.
It will take a while for him to get grips with things, but he has qualities to make an impact.[/article]
Thats the thing though, he's a kid.
1 year younger than Yesil.
Yet people still have written him off already or labelled him shite/meh.
Very strange. Just give him time. .
I would bet my house that the only games Lawerenson has ever seen Origi play are the 3-4 preseason games this year.
he needs to play a lot to progress - he can't be stuck on the bench for ages.
........... then I can't see Origi making many starts, but he needs to play a lot to progress - he can't be stuck on the bench for ages.
i doubt he is going to make many starts and that was probably not the intention.
I really don't know what the intention is/was. You don't expend as much time as the club did last January to cut short his time on loan if the plan was to leave him for the future. Even given the striker shortages of the time, that doesn't add up.
It doesn't help the kid that he arrived to such an OTT welcome from Rodgers:
“For me, he can be one of the most exciting talents in world football. I genuinely believe that. You see a lot of good players, but this kid – for 19 years of age – he burst on to the scene at the World Cup, but we’d tracked him before that, we’d seen him as a young player playing in the youth internationals. He has everything to be world class.”
I don't think he'll be sitting it out Macca, I think he'll get appearances from the bench and lesser games in cup competition, which is right really as the best form of easing him into the side.
Not good enough for him. He needs a regular run of games, which seeing as he doesn't seem good enough yet for the first team means a short loan. He's not going to either find form or recover it by getting the odd run out in the cup.
He had a regular run of games last season in France, had the media and fans on his back and has turned up here with his confidence shot to pieces.
Well on that logic, a run of games will either shoot his confidence to pieces - in which case he's already finished - or he needs a run of games in a better, more positive, context to put his confidence back together. But you don't recover your confidence by playing bits and pieces. Ask Lambert, a man who arrived here from a fecking World Cup!
You're pretty much saying "it won't work",
Saying he's shite now doesn't mean he'll he shite forever.
But based on what we've seen and his record last year for Lille, he's definitely shite now. I don't understand the argument. Nobody could say he's been good. Nobody has also written him off forever.
I'm not going bonkers at all, I've given you a solid example of why I think it won't work (throwing him in), and now I'm getting told to reel it in because I don't agree?
For the record, you opened your post asserting that easing him in is "not going to work for him", all I'm asking is based on what?
I'm not sure who this is directed at? I said he suffered last season and had everyone on his back because he wasn't ready, now Macca is saying give him a run of games. It seems counter productive if last season is any evidence.
It's healthy to have two young players doing that.