I rate him very highly. If we play him through the middle, and I think we would, he is tricky and a goal-scorer.
i'm the same docI rate him very highly. If we play him through the middle, and I think we would, he is tricky and a goal-scorer.
good player, but not what we need. we need a clinical poacher or technical targetman. a van nisterlory or zlatan. someone who will score. sturridge will be clever score a brace in some games, but not consistently.
Like Torrres?I wish we'd go for a ruthless goalscorer. We seem to have spent the last ten years buying players who can do a bit up front and a bit on the wing.
Except that 3 game run where he scored. Not to mention a winner at the Bridge.In my head he never played for us.
Linked with him today in the Mirror. Rodgers want a loan + option to buy.
But apparently sturridge himself turned this option down in the summer so not sure why its bein touted again. If we want someone who can do a job on the wing as well i think walcott would be a better option. He's a terrific finisher in my opinion.
Yeah but i think playing on the wing as part of our front three might appeal more than on the wing as part of a four man midfield at arsenal. Maybe the promise of being rotated around that front three might be enough for him. Still think walcott is a better finisher.I'd say his lack of playing may have softened his opinion. As for Walcott and 'a job on the wing', the reason he's considering leaving Arsenal is because he wants to be played centrally, and would want those assurances. I think Sturridge has the potential to be a better CF than Walcott, and we can try before we buy.
I think it's pertinent to also point out that Sturridge doesn't have Walcott's injury history. That's a very significant factor for me.
WHERE IS BINNY???(Sorry Ross - but Binny ain't here, and I miss him)
Source: Mirror
Where is Doni ?