Pay. Him. What. He. Wants.
I'm so close to taking him out my fantasy team
Mo would have been better taking the money else where like Mane did, quieter life and rather turning into Auba with moaning fans baying for their pound.
You think he's played well enough since AFCON?
Or you think it's Klopp / injuries / formation etc who are to blame for his isolation and inability to control/score near the clip that got him the contract?
If you want to call us moaning fans for wanting our best players to be our best players, ok - so be it.
But I'm just hoping he comes back to form because this team won't finish top 4 without him ... and then maybe, he can get what you wish for him - a nicer, quiet life with non-moaning fans at Madrid, or Paris.
I said before he's been not same since AFCON.
Don't take it personally now about the moaning fans comment...
This thing about fans turning on him is entirely predictable as could see it coming soon as the contract extension talk came.
I don't wish for him to leave but it would have been easier, he would have got the same money or more in middle east, or couple of other clubs.
I just don't see the constant focus on Salah, call it what you want. Best for club, best for players but if you want to focus on Salah's extra 120k a week increment being the focus on here's what bothers me more if that's the case:
My point is there's awful lot of players at LFC who aren't fit but take a wage whom have never contributed as much Salah over 5yrs so I'm likely to focus on them before turning on Mo.
- Milner singing a new contract - gets over 100k 37yr old and now he has started every major game this season because we have become reliant on him
- Gomez with a new contract - too relaxed and is always liable to switch off - he gets over 100k
- Ox - why??? He gets over 100k too
- Naby - why?? He gets over 100k too
I would prefer Mo to get a couple of games through the center but then soon as Mo went off today, we looked worse on the right.
Let's not be foolishly naive, he only wants to stay because the team will win trophies and he has no latin blood. Were that not the case, he'd be talking no differently to the others who came before him. Also let's not pretend these are not injection marks all over him, you can barely count them you don't even see this on UFC fighters, he just doesn't give a fuck. If memory serves he wasn't playing all that well a few months back, he's obviously juiced himself up, is now playing like fucking god, so he's not stupid, these performances and interviews will get him that contract, then he will stop injecting himself, and we'll be arguing about his form again like clowns.
Why have we "turned" on Mo?
Hes one of our 3 most important players, if not most important, and hes been off for months.
Its very worrying because without him, I dont think we rediscover our form from last few years, and that's why he gets the heat/concern
You tell me? Easy target???
His form is off but so is about 7 other players.
He was on silly money on before and was playing well, don’t get the logic on money being the single biggest driver.
Those that say we should kept Mane, well hello? Mane told us a year ago we he wanted to bugger off a full year and a bit ago.
If Mo was the only problem then would be an easier fix and we would be where we were still winnging games post Christmas this year but it’s obvious he’s not.
He's one of our best players mate - and he's our only goalscorer (Diaz looks like he's becoming one).
We need him to have a chance to finish top 4 ...
So it's fair that he's a target - and I don't care about the money at all. He's earned it. I care about what I see on the pitch - and I just think he looks isolated and struggling for confidence.
I am tougher on VvD than Gomez, Matip and Konate. Why? Because he's key to our defense.
He's been very average - and we need more from him too. What we need though is proper leadership - I want him at his teammates when they are fucking jogging back etc.
We oculd have kept Mane - money would have done it imo and that would have been my choice, but it's irrelevant. Klopp needs to earn his money - and find a way to ensure Salah is more involved in the box, or next year, we won't have to worry about spending to keep up with the big teams.
Currently there’s so many players off form, not trying it seems hard enough, I don’t know where to begin.
Just how much better controlled if we had 3 midfielders sitting and doing the screening? Fab looks overrun every time on a simple ball counter.
We may have to accept this season needs to just happen for FSG and management to buy the 3-4 key replacements next year.
I turned on Mo back in feb when he came out as a greedy cunt asking for £350k a week. The. His agent acting a cunt. Now he’s doing fuck all to deserve that money.
Hendo shouldn’t have got a new contract. Ox and Keita (and Firmino) needed to have been bounced out of the club a year or two ago. That’s about 400k a week for a group that shouldn’t be in the starting XI 70% of the time.
Agreed, however I would add a few points.This makes me think… For all he’s done in football, Klopp never really had the experience of dealing with star players getting past their prime - at Dortmund the culling happened the “natural way” by all his best players beingeaten by wolvesbought off by Bayern. What he is finding out, perhaps, is that it’s extremely difficult to keep playing heavy metal football once the average squad age gets on the older side and the best players earn their biggest contract and don’t have all that much left to prove or left in the tank. It’s hardly a coincidence that our best players this season are Diaz, Elliott and Carvalho.
This makes me think… For all he’s done in football, Klopp never really had the experience of dealing with star players getting past their prime - at Dortmund the culling happened the “natural way” by all his best players beingeaten by wolvesbought off by Bayern. What he is finding out, perhaps, is that it’s extremely difficult to keep playing heavy metal football once the average squad age gets on the older side and the best players earn their biggest contract and don’t have all that much left to prove or left in the tank. It’s hardly a coincidence that our best players this season are Diaz, Elliott and Carvalho.
To be fair, kicking out players at the first sign of decline goes against Klopp's ethos and message of unity and working together. I have heard that Bill Shankly was a bit of a softy who liked to hold on to players because of his loyal nature. It was Uncle Bob, who was more of a ruthless operator who had a good sense of when to let players go. Klopp has to be the good cop. What we really need is a bad cop number 2, who identifies players on decline and works with the transfer committee to replace them instead of writing stupid books like intensity.
Whilst I agree with the points in your post this isn't a thing as any long-serving manager over the decades just emphasises, including Shanks (15 yrs) & Paisley (9 yrs).Agreed, however I would add a few points.
The first being that the sound of a managers voice becomes less effective as time goes on. It's partly why clubs chop and change so readily, so that's another likely challenge Klopp is likely currently facing, even with all his man-management skills.
Yeah sorry, big no. It's all well and good the statisticians and coaching staff in Liverpool having an influence on the playing squad but the last thing we need is interference from corporate lizards in the USA.Exactly. I wouldn’t want Klopp to change - you need genuine loyalty and compassion to be a great teacher and he’s one of the best football teachers on the planet. But someone else needs to be the ruthless bad guy to offset those qualities - instead FSG seem to take advantage of Klopp’s optimism and love for his players in order to justify investing less and avoiding tough decisions - “well, Mr. Klopp says he can still probably unearth some hidden unfulfilled potential in Oxlade and Keita, so who are we to argue?” It’s your fucking job to argue and question and be the ruthless Yankee bosses you’re supposed to be!