Just posting this link because I like this account
This guy is
INEXPENSIVE and
DUTCH so it already fulfils two of the three key criteria we use for evaluating players.
The only problem is that he's a pure Defensive Mid, which might tempt Klopp to instantly eliminate him. As a relative unknown, his signing would probably infuriate the fans, though which is definitely a factor that swings heavily in favour of us signing him.
Anyway, interesting article here that mentions him as a potential LOW COST replacement for Fabinho. He's golden really. Feyenoord signed him for €600,000 so if Schamdtke comes knocking they'll likely make a 10000% profit.Very well played.
[article]
While the suggestion of replacing Fabinho may raise a few eyebrows, it is important that the Brazilian turns 30 this year, and has produced a few poor performances this season. It is also important to remember that Liverpool may not have to dip into the market at all for this one with Bajčetić playing so well this campaign. Nevertheless, having a list of players ready to explore is a good idea. In line with Fabinho’s role, this segment of analysis will focus on defensive data, along with a brief analysis of on-the-ball efficiency.
We begin by getting some first impressions of the candidates to replace Fabinho. It goes without saying, whoever it eventually is has big boots to fill — and must excel defensively. The metric above, successful defensive actions, is what it says on the tin. It includes all defensive metrics, from defensive duels to interceptions and so on. As the chart tells us, Fabinho contributes
9.21 successful defensive actions per 90 minutes, which suggests that he keeps himself busy defensively despite Liverpool often dominating games.
A clutch of players boast a higher average than Fabinho, but the standout is Mats Wieffer of Feyenoord, who averages a whopping
14.09 successful defensive actions per game. Not only does this show defensive desire, but also consistency in success, a real solid individual in midfield. Not too far behind Wieffer is 20-year-old Johann Lepenant (Lyon), who successfully executes
12.29 defensive actions per 90.
Digging deeper into the defensive ability of the candidates, we will now provide analysis of their ability when it comes to defensive duels. While this metric would have been a factor in their successful defensive actions, looking at it this way also allows us to paint a picture of their tackling ability. Fabinho ranks at the lower end when it comes to the number of defensive duels he engages in (again, this is down to Liverpool’s game dominance), and ranks fairly average in the number of duels he wins, which currently stands at
59.65% for this season.
Wieffer and Lepenant stand out again, this time for the number of duels they attempt, but of the two, Lepenant’s success rate of
63.68% is superior. Looking elsewhere, we see strong contenders in Florentino Luís of Benfica and Azor Matusiwa (Reims), but the strongest of the lot is FC Twente’s Ramiz Zerrouki, who may rank below the group average for the number of attempts, but leads the way with his success rate of
67.25.
Breaking up the opposition play with an interception is an important ability for any outfield player, but an interception in midfield areas can really protect the defending unit. It is important to remember that the interception metric in the chart above is possession adjusted, to even the playing field in terms of the average amount of possession of each candidate’s team. With that in mind, Fabinho comes in with
6.7 (PAdj) interceptions per 90.
Mats Wieffer is really making a good impression of himself, isn’t he? To say he stands out here is an understatement, with the Feyenoord man averaging
11.28 (PAdj) interceptions per game — a significant increase on the record of any other play in the data set. Florentino Luís and Matusiwa show numbers than better Fabinho again, so we can’t ignore their contributions. The same can be said for Zerrouki.
[/article]