wasn't referring to the firm.
Virgiling on the vandijkulous
- Thread starter Skullflower
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
wasn't referring to the firm.
I miss the 'wheelie bins' reports.
He's also made it clear he specifically wants to join us. In your desperation to talk us down you seem to think you know what he wants better than he does himself.
But it also says "should such interest still excist". That sounds like us after this summers cock up and public apology.
I doubt he would have needed a transfer request to move to Chelsea. Soton would have sold him without one, and Chelsea would have moved sooner.
That he favours us I have no doubt, but our ability to get this deal done gives me much bigger doubt.
I doubt he would have needed a transfer request to move to Chelsea. Soton would have sold him without one, and Chelsea would have moved sooner.
That he favours us I have no doubt, but our ability to get this deal done gives me much bigger doubt.
I must have missed that part of his statement
Insolvent.
The bookies have been paying attention even if you haven't - we're 4/5 on favourites to sign van Dijk with Ladbrokes at lunchtime today.
What are the odds for coutinho staying?
Regrettably similar - most have him 4/6 on to leave.
And to stay at liverpool?
Evens, so despite what they're offering on a move they're not saying he's nailed on to go.
Still somewhere on the south coast of England.
Wankers....i was hoping it was better odds than that so i could have put on a bet.
Ragnick made a huge bet that he will stay it seem....
Wonder if their FA allows that over there.
It's not their FA, but the old Bayern hierarchy that decides whats allowed and not over there!!
So they'd rather see an asset depreciate by 60 million quid than sell him to Liverpool Football Club who have done nothing different than any other team, and who have bankrolled them for the last 3-4 years? Leave it out.
I can see them rejecting our offer if Chelsea offer the same. We are very much responsible for his current state of mind.
If we've offered the same then they have to offer both options to the player rather than accept just one.
For all the scoffing over the 'slavery' comments, there are regulations in place to stop clubs having complete control over a players future & that is one of them.
If they did accept Chelsea's offer & not ours & they were found to be the same the could be charged.
That said, we'd probably offer to pay it over fifteen years in the form of bags full of cans to be recycled or something, making the argument null & void.
As if a club like Soton would leave a 60 mill player sit in the stands for a season.
I dont get the hatred in regards to selling to us either, we've paid them some hefty fees these last few years. 20 mill for Lovren being the top of the cherry.
For 60 mill £ they could strengthen 3 positions, not look weak and secure a top 8-10 league spot.
Their fans are up there with the Blueshite now in terms of bitternes.
I dont get the hatred in regards to selling to us either, we've paid them some hefty fees these last few years. 20 mill for Lovren being the top of the cherry.
For 60 mill £ they could strengthen 3 positions, not look weak and secure a top 8-10 league spot.
Their fans are up there with the Blueshite now in terms of bitternes.
That is absolutely the sort of comment someone with no budgetary or financial responsibilities at that shit hole would say (I.e someone's who opinion means jack shit)
I'm not sure the regulations cover that situation.
The fear is that they make some compromise with the player close to deadline day. You can leave but only to this and this club, but not Liverpool. It wouldnt surprise me if they despise us that much by now.
All comes down to VVD I guess, and how much more we offer then the other clubs.
The cock up from earlier this summer might cost us an extra 10 mill £ to get this done.
That kind of stuff is laughable. And so is all the 'Southampton will sell him to another club to spite LFC' guff. Maybe we should have sold Sterling to Norwich for a couple of million, just to spite City, or Suarez for £10m to Tenerife, just to show Barca. Clubs can't force players to sign with other clubs if they don't want to play for those clubs. If VVD wants to sign for us he'll sign for us and not some other team. He's not a slave. He'll go where he wants to go, and the club will have to concentrate on getting as much money as possible.
Similar threads
-
- Locked
