• You may have to login or register before you can post and view our exclusive members only forums.
    To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Trent, Salah and VVD

Then take a closer look at my post that I linked to !
Like I said you are comparing a player whos played almost only a third of that l, in such cases just looking at stats is not enough. Clearly Bradley is better defensively but Klopp didn’t ask his RB to just defend, it’s secondary. When you are playing 60 games a season, if you are only available for 20 then it’s not a viable option.
 
Like I said you are comparing a player whos played almost only a third of that l, in such cases just looking at stats is not enough. Clearly Bradley is better defensively but Klopp didn’t ask his RB to just defend, it’s secondary. When you are playing 60 games a season, if you are only available for 20 then it’s not a viable option.
Thanks. You've just made the exact points I was making. Bradders is better defensively and this is a Slot team NOT a Klopp team. I don't know if Bradders is the man to take over RB under Slot - but I know Trent isn't.
 
Thanks. You've just made the exact points I was making. Bradders is better defensively and this is a Slot team NOT a Klopp team. I don't know if Bradders is the man to take over RB under Slot - but I know Trent isn't.
Well not all same points.
Anyway, current Slot RB is Trent. Slot isn’t that much different than Klopp. It’s not exactly Conte is it… Since we don’t spend money speculatively, unless he choses to go in Jan himself, it will stay that way I reckon.
 
But equally, why play the full 108 minutes?
I guess first 55 mins was related first half and second half due to the fact we wanted a goal. The fact he took Bradley off meant if he was worried about fitness, he would have taken him off. He is our best forward and literally have no alternative on right if required with Chiesa looking to leave
 
Back
Top Bottom