The Egyptian King
- Thread starter Dreambeliever
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
Real would have spent 70m on the 18 year old new Mo three seasons ago, though.
United would probably pay us 80m this summer - even though he's out of contract - before signing him to that 4 year deal.
The last time Salah played less than 80 mins in any game he started for us was in Oct vs. Leipzig (63 mins).
View: https://x.com/premierleague/status/1898483036984889849
View: https://x.com/premierleague/status/1898483036984889849
He’s been out of this World this season:
View: https://x.com/anfieldedition/status/1900570263357472825?s=46
View: https://x.com/anfieldedition/status/1900570263357472825?s=46
Does anyone really want to keep Jota?
Depends on if we can get a fee for him. And if we'll try to replace him in the transfer market.
Otherwise we're placing a lot of faith in Danns. Who Slot will almost certainly never play.
I think we will get two forwards in this summer. Jota and Nunez aren’t definitely going
Hope you aren’t suggesting we have other forwards who could be chipping in? I thought it’s all about the main man only 😉
Yeah, I’m coming round to the idea that both him and Darwin need to go.
Dunno who I’d like as replacements though.
Know any other options we have that is second to Mbappe in the world but ahead of Raphina?
Reckon Arse would neck and neck if we didn’t have Salah.
My point is these stats are a bit pointless.
With context they mean something, them alone then probably not. I assume all best clubs use the stats heavily for transfers and renewals at very least.
Are they pointless, it's essentially a list of the best attackers in the world.
I mean they're pointless in that it shouldn't be much of a surprise to anyone who's in that list.
I mean they're pointless in that it shouldn't be much of a surprise to anyone who's in that list.
Doesn't move me much closer. He enters the area, a lot.
I guess not, but you can add it to all the others that suggest he is. It's quite a big pile.
Or you could say he makes a team's attack top of the pile. We also have other strikers but I don't see them in there thought so maybe there's a reason why Mo is?
Jeez, you don't have to always look for a narrative. It's not by chance we are top and I can give you a few stats reasons why we are top of the pile and Salah is one of them.
& Garnacho is there too.
Look, either way sooner or later we're going to have to find a new formula that works for us......and make no mistake about it, there will be a time when this club come again......how long that takes is yet to be determined. There's no point looking for an alternative for Mo is there isn't one on the market, this is where we have to put on our thinking caps and plan ahead. The team can still be as strong in Mo's absense and for sure can be as successful, that may need to come in conjuction with City's demise or at the least not being at their most dominant.
It's a small sample size but nonetheless still worthy of acknowledgement - last season during a significant period in the season, Mo missed 14 games due to AFCON and his subsequent injury. We won 11, drew 1 and lost 2 (winning a cup final in the process) - we scored 33 and conceded 11. Some would even say our attack gelled better and looked more fluid (games against Chelsea & Bournemouth).
It's a small sample size but nonetheless still worthy of acknowledgement - last season during a significant period in the season, Mo missed 14 games due to AFCON and his subsequent injury. We won 11, drew 1 and lost 2 (winning a cup final in the process) - we scored 33 and conceded 11. Some would even say our attack gelled better and looked more fluid (games against Chelsea & Bournemouth).
